Channel
πππππ ππππ πππππβ β₯οΈ
@video_textshine
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,368subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001657707972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @video_textshine |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/video_textshine |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 1,368 | -6 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 1,374 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 1,374 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 1,385 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 1,398 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 1,397 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 1,396 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 1,394 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 1,399 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 1,401 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,406 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,405 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hoseinmusicc Β· 73,379
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here β alongside 51 others β read 21 August 2026
@solii_edit Β· 27,465
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 58 here β alongside 57 others β read 10 September 2026
@mixm4l Β· 19,290
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here β alongside 55 others β read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ ππππ πππππβ β₯οΈβ (@video_textshine), 1,368 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/video_textshine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.