HABLEMOS CLARO! NI DUALIDADES NI AMBIGÜEDADES. ESTAMOS ANTE DESAFÍOS CRUCIALES. Algunos estiman que los nacionalistas dominicanos, no debemos apoyar a Donald Trump y las ejecutorias de su Administración, tanto en política doméstica, como en el plano ínternacional. Porque EEUU ejerce una posición "imperialista" y defiende exclusivamente "sus intereses geopolíticos". No es nuevo en la historia la condición y exist…

Channel
Vida cotidiana RD 🇩🇴
@vidacotidianard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,443subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001530540380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vidacotidianard |
| Created | 4 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vidacotidianard |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 2,443 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 2,445 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 2,450 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 2,450 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29m 48s
- Average length
- 2m 08s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 72.4% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 27.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Trump. El malvado Trump, el ambicioso, el loco, el fanático, el perverso, el malvado Trump. El candidato y presidente más difamado, perseguido y atacado, en toda la historia de los Estados Unidos. Demostrando en cada una de sus ejecutorias, su certeza, capacidad, valor, coraje y eficiencia, para sacar el país adelante. Contra toda opinión. El que llega al gobierno de Estados Unidos sin una base partidaria, sin exp…
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Aquí la respuestas LA INGENIERÍA CLIMÁTICA Y LAS ONDAS LF clic 👇 https://t.me/vidacotidianard/3612 Resúmenes de la plandemia y sus objetivos clic 👇 https://t.me/vidacotidianard/2535 Las antenas 5G después de la vacunas clic 👇 https://t.me/vidacotidianard/3038 @vidacotidianard
👍3
¿Sabías que el presidente tiene 8 días para promulgar o devolver una ley al Congreso? La Constitución de la República Dominicana es clara. El presidente juró cumplir y hacer cumplir la Constitución al asumir el cargo (art. 127). Pero la misma Constitución establece en su artículo 22 que todo ciudadano tiene derecho a elegir y ser elegido, lo que incluye las candidaturas independientes. Además, el artículo 216 reco…
👍5
El país está gobernado por un grupo de mafiosos.🇩🇴
👍3
Oiga esto.
Le quemaron el carro
https://t.me/vidacotidianard/3038
❤1
Porque será que me limitan los comentarios en este video señor @ggomezmazara léase el artículo 06, 49 de la constitución ATT: Francisco peña Atención @TribunalConstRD
❤1
¿ Si no existiera el derecho a la familia para crear personas entre un hombre y una mujer, pudiera existir el sentimiento de la divers1dad de géner0.?
❤1
👀 👉 ¡ TODOS ESTÁN VACUNADOS 💉Y TIENEN SU CÓDIGO M.A.C. (MEDIA ACCESS CONTROL), Y NO SE ENTERAN DE NADA ! 💥 "Todos los presentes son médicos que siguen «a ciegas» las indicaciones de la OMS (Organización Mundial Satánica 👿), con un desconocimiento total, porque no investigan nada". - "Todos tienen ya su código MAC (Media Access Control) … ya han fallecido muchos … y los actuales siguen a pie juntillas los protocolos …
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vidacotidianard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 425,378 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vidacotidianard named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vida cotidiana RD 🇩🇴” (@vidacotidianard), 2,443 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vidacotidianard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.