Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 64 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 08:37
374
-3
29 Sept 2026, 22:55
377
-9
15 Sept 2026, 07:38
386
-3
8 Sept 2026, 11:58
389
-17
29 Aug 2026, 10:29
406
-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:35
412
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:24
412
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,979 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
913
46.1%
👍
884
44.7%
🔥
56
2.83%
🥰
27
1.36%
🎉
26
1.31%
😁
22
1.11%
❤🔥
19
0.96%
👏
12
0.606%
💯
4
0.202%
🤗
4
0.202%
👌
3
0.152%
💘
3
0.152%
🙏
3
0.152%
⚡
2
0.101%
🤩
1
0.051%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,979 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2024 to 28 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Смотри, ты сам создаёшь свою Реальность ! Всегда ! Только ты !
Ты ответственен за это !
Только ты !
Твоя Реальность управляема твоим вниманием !‼️
Кому ты отправил своё внимание сегодня ‼️??? Энергию !!! А вчера ?
Убери весь контент -который делает тебе плохо !
Ребятки ! Мои доброжелатели , смотрите , всё, абсолютно всёё, что даётся без оплаты , в ютубе или других соц сетях - это очень прекрасно ! Правда ! Очень !!!
Но❗️❗️❗️
Знаю по опыту , это никто не делает , не практикует то, что даётся в безграничных количествах на просторах интернета !!! Да ! Так и есть ! И самое интересное , что если действительно есть запрос , он решается точечно , индивидуально !
Тогда ВАШ результа…
Каждое желание живого существа - исполнится .
ВЕДЫ.
Как и страх .
Кому ты отправил сегодня свою энергию ? Страху ? Желаниям ?
Работай над собой ❗️
Твоя интуиция , это голос Бога . Не игнорируй её.
Привет мои хорошие !
Канал почистили от ботов .
Первый мой опыт онлайн :) и это прикольно 🤪😀
Не вела канал 2 месяца , ухххххх
Это мега трансформации оффлайн . Такого в моей жизни давно не было …
Это космос 🚀 Никак иначе !
Слежу за рынком иногда , вижу , ребята хотят контент личный , человеку нужен человек . Так и есть …
Немного 🤏 посыла в этот пост , перед , классным воплощением моих идей в жизнь .
Все мои оффлайн -…
Жизнь коротка .
И проходит как песчинки сквозь пальцы - на берегу моря в жаркий летний день.
Ты действительно живешь жизнь своей мечты ?
Если да , я безумно рада за тебя , ведь мы все - одно . Источник один .
Если ты ещё не там , где хочешь быть , пиши мне
@VICTORIYA_36
Мест на волшебную работу на июнь- осталось немного.
Без совместной , красивой интригующей работы двоих над отношениями - приходит конец семье .
Всегда кто ~то в паре любит больше . И это прекрасно . Так создана природа .
Тем не менее , каждый получает то, что хотел.
По -настоящему.
А ТЫ ЗНАЕШЬ ЧЕГО ТЫ ХОЧЕШЬ ПО-НАСТОЯЩЕМУ???
О ! Как обворожителен первый танец, первый поцелуй, первые прикосновения , первые свидания ! первый год встреч ! И первые годы совместной супружеской жизни ! Какое счастье , испытывать ЭТО чувство … ЧИСТОЙ НАСТОЯЩЕЙ ВЗАИМНОЙ ЛЮБВИ !!!
А дальше что ? Дальше так ли все обворожительно ?!
МОЙ КОРОЛЬ pinned «Я Виктория Эксперт в работе с подсознанием . КВАНТОВЫЙ психолог -КОУЧ. Сертифицированный и дипломированный специалист .Работаю с разными техниками и инструментами , и такими как ( PSYCH-K).Моя сила - я вижу «стопперы» , которые тормозят тебя во всех сферах…»
НЕ СДАВАЙСЯ !!!
Never give up !
Never give up !
Never give up ! ❗️❗️❗️
👍115❤105❤🔥2💘1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @victoriya_nastavnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2024 to 28 July 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МОЙ КОРОЛЬ” (@victoriya_nastavnik), 374 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/victoriya_nastavnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.