7 DAYS LEFT ⏳ The clock is ticking. One week to join the AI Builder Hackathon and bring your idea to life. Don’t fade it → VictoriavrAI Builder Hackathon 2026: Build the Future of AI-Native 3D Experiences | Victoria VR
🔥7🥱6❤1
Signed Alex

Channel
@victoriavrnews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18,532subscribers
-667 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001498144737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @victoriavrnews |
| Created | 27 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/victoriavrnews |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 18,532 | -29 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 18,561 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 18,581 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 18,594 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 18,615 | -33 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 18,648 | -50 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 18,698 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 18,727 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 18,754 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:53 | 18,784 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 18,804 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 18,820 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 18,834 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 18,844 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 18,865 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 18,869 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 18,885 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 18,907 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 18,930 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 18,963 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (19 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,638 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
378 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 219 | 57.9% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 11.1% | |
| 🥱 | 18 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 4.23% | |
| 😴 | 6 | 1.59% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.529% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.529% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.265% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.265% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.265% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7 DAYS LEFT ⏳ The clock is ticking. One week to join the AI Builder Hackathon and bring your idea to life. Don’t fade it → VictoriavrAI Builder Hackathon 2026: Build the Future of AI-Native 3D Experiences | Victoria VR
🔥7🥱6❤1
Signed Alex
Week 3 of Creator Quest is here. New week. New assets. Same challenge. We’ve seen what you created in the first two weeks, and now it’s time to take it even further. This week, use the new Creator Quest assets to create something original around Victoria VR, AI Hub, AI Agents, or the wider ecosystem. Meme. Lore. Prediction. Inside joke. Your call. The rules stay simple: Make it original. Make it relevant. Make it…
🔥8🥱4
Signed Jaroslav Mejstrik
🏆 Referral Points Challenge complete. The $1,000 prize pool will be distributed automatically. Congrats to the Top 20 winners, and thanks to everyone who joined. More opportunities coming soon.
🔥7❤1
Signed Jaroslav Mejstrik
Milestone crossed: 15,000+ users on AI Hub 15,000 users. One unstoppable community. ⚡️
🔥10
Signed Alex
We've just crossed 2,000,000 matches on AI Hub 🤖 Huge shoutout to everyone creating, upgrading, and competing with their Agents. Create your Agent and join the fight 👇 https://vrai168.com/hub
👏9❤4🔥2
Signed Alex
AI Agents don't just show us how they fight. They show us how they move, position, choose routes, create combat hotspots, and shape the pace of a match. In What We Learn From AI Agents: Part 2, we explore how Agent gameplay helps us better understand maps and the systems interacting inside them. Read Part 2 👇 https://www.victoriavr.com/news/what-we-learn-from-ai-agents---part-2-cf9ec65c
🔥12
Signed Alex
We’ve been seeing all the Creator Quest posts from last week, and some of you seriously understood the assignment. New week. New Creator Quest. New assets. This week, we’re giving you a fresh set of assets to work with. Use them to create something original around Victoria VR, AI Hub, AI Agents, or the ecosystem. Meme. Lore. Prediction. Inside joke. Your call. Just remember: Make it original. Make it relevant. Make…
🔥6❤1
Signed Alex
While we keep building, AI Hub keeps growing ⚡️ 400,948 total smart contract txns 114,510 topups completed 38,658 new AI Agents More usage. More Agents. More activity across the ecosystem.
🔥10
Signed Alex
Ready to build the future and compete for a share of €20K? 🤖 The AI Builder Hackathon is on. Registration closes Sept 8: https://www.victoriavr.com/news/ai-builder-hackathon-2026-build-the-future-of-ai-native-3d-experiences-5915194b
🔥10
Signed Alex
Creator Quest is live ⚡️ Every week during Social Mining, a new Creator Quest will drop. Your mission: Download the assets from the comments and use AI to create something original around Victoria VR, AI Hub, AI Agents, or the ecosystem. It can be: • a meme • a piece of lore • a prediction • a community inside joke • or something we didn’t see coming The only rule: Make it original. Make it relevant. Make it mean …
🔥11❤1
Signed Alex
AI Agents do more than play. They reveal patterns. In What We Learn From AI Agents: Part 1, we explore how Agent gameplay helps us understand spell usage, loadout performance, combat strategies, reactions, and dominant or underused mechanics. The more Agents play, the more we can learn about how different strategies perform across different situations. 🔗 Read it here: https://www.victoriavr.com/news/what-we-learn-…
🔥8👍2
Signed Alex
Stay Eligible • Keep all competition posts publicly visible. • Stay active throughout the competition period. • Engage with @VictoriaVR posts by replying, reposting, or quote reposting. • Keep following @VictoriaVR until the winners are announced. • Follow the new AI Hub updates and features rolling out throughout the month. They’ll give you even more opportunities to create original content. • Watch for our weekly C…
Signed Alex
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @victoriavrnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@victoriavrnews named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Victoria VR - Announcements” (@victoriavrnews), 18,532 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/victoriavrnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.