Ну а маленькие закуски, которые официанты раздают на подносах это👇🏼
- Mini snacks16%
- Canapés80%
- Reception buffet4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@victoria_english_secrets
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,061subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001278593603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @victoria_english_secrets |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/victoria_english_secrets |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 1,061 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 1,059 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 1,054 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:28 | 1,058 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 1,061 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,063 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 1,062 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 1,060 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 1,055 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1,058 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 1,058 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
229 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 34.1% | |
| custom 5458379799393216748 | 60 | 26.2% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 13.5% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 7.42% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 4.80% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.31% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.437% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну а маленькие закуски, которые официанты раздают на подносах это👇🏼
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А «фуршет» на свадьбе/церемонии награждения/выпускном
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Шведский стол» по-английски это👇🏼
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Быстрая проверка, готовы ли вы к различным summer occasions😜👇🏼
На pub quiz британские подружки на днях оценили, что с ними препод английского🤣 А все из-за собирательных существительных для животных. It’s mind-blowing, но! в английском очень много специальных слов для разных групп животных. И не все даже самые умные носители знают эти слова🤫(и я тоже не все знаю) Например, стадо волков - a pack of wolves, овец - a flock of sheep, слонов/лошадей - a heard. Но на мой взгляд самы…
🔥12❤8👍4🍓1
Недавно я сама оказалась в ситуации, когда мой английский прошёл проверку на прочность. Ночью у дочки поднялась температура, и я решила позвонить в 111. Каждый раз удивляюсь одной вещи: как сотрудники поликлиник и больниц разговаривают с людьми по телефону. Говорят быстро, со своим акцентом, а если просишь повторить - повторяют... теми же словами и в том же темпе. Как будто даже не приходит в голову, что можно сказа…
❤10💯3
Причем тут карри? Когда я первый раз ходила на футбольный матч здесь, я недоумевала, почему поют Vindaloo (название карри), думала мне показалось и может на самом деле кричат что-то другое🙈 Это сингл британской группы Fat Les, выпущенный в 1998 года специально к ЧМ по футболу. Автором текста стал комик Keith Allen. Изначально песня задумывалась как пародия на футбольные кричалки, но болельщики приняли ее как настоя…
❤9
Продолжая тему сленга… Мой муж уверен, что ругаться матом при ребенке не стоит уже с самого рождения (пока не будем ему говорить, да?😀), поэтому сегодня, приехав с работы сказал про определенных людей: Some utter see you next Tuesdays (people) - я сначала не поняла, а потом как поняла🙈 Кто понял, ставьте ❤️
❤8
Пишу в чатик с друзьями, что скоро будем у них, а мне в ответ муж подруги пишет вот это🫣 Плохие новости: снова что-то новенькое из сленга🤣 Хорошие новости: чем больше знаешь английского, тем лучше работает языковая догадка. Sick = cool/awesome/great Blud = очевидно, что от “blood” Решила, что это будет что-то типа “cool, bro😀” Когда пришла в гости потребовала объяснений на нормальном английском🙈оказалось, что это…
😁9❤4👍4
Victoria’s English Secrets🇬🇧 pinned a photo
Posted without readable text
Ну что, по мотивам вчерашнего дня😜 Bromance = bro + romance
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @victoria_english_secrets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну а маленькие закуски, которые официанты раздают на подносах это👇🏼
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А «фуршет» на свадьбе/церемонии награждения/выпускном
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Шведский стол» по-английски это👇🏼
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Victoria’s English Secrets🇬🇧” (@victoria_english_secrets), 1,061 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/victoria_english_secrets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.