реакции реакции ставим ставим

Channel
𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙆𝙧𝙪𝙢/𝘦𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳
@vickrqm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004243080449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vickrqm |
| Description | 𝒎𝒆: @efermerbot 𝒎𝒚 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆: @ivqnova 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐: @epheinf |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 6 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vickrqm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 34 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 34 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 129.4%
- avg views ÷ 34 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 44.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 21.8%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (6 June 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 132 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 23.7% | |
| 🏆 | 14 | 18.4% | |
| 🍾 | 12 | 15.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 6.58% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 3.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vickrqm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Одна только мысль о том, что Крам снова будет сражаться против Ивановой пугала слишком сильно. 🩸🩸🩸 Дни до выбора чемпионов сокращались всё быстрее, а волнение Виктора на этот счёт нарастало всё больше. Во что бы то ни стало Виктор решил встретиться с Кларой. Девушка прекрасно знала, что он так сделает, поэтому сама уже ждала его в подземелье. Виктор подошёл к ней ближе и взял её за руку. – Клара, пообещай мне, что…
❤5🍾5🏆5💔1
🅿️🔠🅾™️⚔️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 🤩🤩🤩🤩: #𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐭 #𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 🔠🅰Ⓜ️🔚➗Кубок огня. 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 ⭐⭐Острые крыши Хогвартса разрезали ⭐⭐серый туман в небе. ⭐⭐Большие ботинки Виктора Крама ⭐⭐осторожно ступили на сырую землю. ⭐⭐Оживлённый и восторженный ⭐⭐гул дурмстрангцев давал надежду, ⭐⭐что Виктор здесь не один. Парни во главе с Каркаровым ровным строем, гремя чемоданами, зашагали маршем прямо к воротам Хогвартса. До начала ра…
⚡1🍓1💋1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😵💫 🤩🤩💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋💋 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝑲𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝑰𝒗𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒂 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓴 𝓸𝓯 𝓵𝓸𝓿𝓮 –𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓻𝓾𝓼𝓱 𝓸𝓯 𝓫𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 ”𝓢𝓱𝓮 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓶𝓮“ – 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓖𝓪𝓵𝓵𝓲𝓬 𝓼𝓱𝓻𝓾𝓰. 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 #𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒕 #𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒔 #𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆
❤🔥2❤1🍓1🏆1💋1💘1
🩸🩸🩸Парни жили в соседней каюте от Каркарова. Всё таки оба были его помощниками, а Крам к тому же был возможным чемпионом, поэтому директор держал обоих под своим крылом. Дорога предстояла довольно долгая, поэтому планов у парней было тоже много. Начали они конечно же с игр в "дурака". Виктор взял с собой карты и предложил другу сыграть, на что тот с радостью и энтузиазмом согласился. Пару десяток игр, и больше побед …
❤3🍾2💋2💔1
🅿️🔠🅾™️⚔️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 🤩🤩🤩🤩: #𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐭 #𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 🔠🅰Ⓜ️🔚➗ Маленькое начало крупных неприятностей 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 ⭐⭐Радостные вопли и громкие ⭐⭐аплодисменты остались за ⭐⭐спиной. ⭐⭐Виктор выходил с поля после ⭐⭐очередной успешной игры. ⭐⭐Для него это было обычно. ⭐⭐Толпы зрителей, которые смотрели на него с восхищением, уже стали для него что-то вроде серой массы. Метла в руке в этот раз ощущалась гораздо тяжелее,…
❤2💋1💔1
💋💋🤩🤩🤩🤩 💋💋 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 – Турнир Трёх Волшебников, традицонное величайшее событие в истории магии. но... в этот раз всё пошло не так. внезапно Кубок Огня решил сыграть со всеми злую шутку, и вот уже Турнир Трёх Волшебников пригласил к участию четвёртую участницу – Клару Иванову из Колдотворца. глаза Крама блеснули азартом с примесью вселенской печали. в этот раз их любовь сыграла против них. сможет ли Крам противостоять с…
🍾4⚡3❤🔥3
Игорь Каркаров, конечно, не сжалился над спортсменами. но, Виктор втайне стал отменять некоторые тренировки из-за «плохого здоровья» или стресса перед Чемпионатом. однако, в глубине души у Виктора всё же засела обида на команду и Каркарова, но им это знать необязательно. Крам знал, что он умеет чувствовать, возможно даже лучше, чем многие другие. но знал, что в его случае, чувства – слабость, особенно для команды. е…
❤5❤🔥3🏆3💔2🍓1🍾1💋1💘1
пружины скрипнули. Виктор встал с дивана и расправил плечи. сейчас он был словно орел перед птенцами, хотя в глубине души чувствовал себя лишь бездомным котёнком. – я всё время старался на благо команды, делал вам поблажки, чтобы вы чувствовали себя лучше. а сейчас я должен слушать, как вы называете меня «подстилкой Каркарова»? хватит. я устал терпеть это неуважение. разбирайтесь сами. 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 ⭐⭐всю следующую…
🏆2
🤩🤩Ведь никто не замечал, что мне 🤩🤩плохо или обидно, но мою агрессию и злость замечали сразу. возможны отхождения от канона. 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 резкий толчок в ребро и холод, пробирающий до костей. приближался Чемпионат Мира по квиддичу, а тренировки становились всё жёстче. семь самых лучших игроков Дурмстранга были отобраны, чтобы побороться за звание Чемпионов мира. капитаном команды конечно же был Виктор Крам. на его …
🏆2❤1❤🔥1💘1
🌟𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫: привет, сделаешь свой топ 10 по оформлению? 🍸: ну чтож, поехали @ivqnova @AllisonRouf @theodorenottyy @LianConfrer @pursaj @franchermione @drug_H_G @LUNA67GOOD @Ronald_weasley_rev @ArtemiusNeut они экспонат, я их фанат. мне безумно нравится их оформление, хочу быть такими же крутыми как они
💋2
🅿️🅰™️🔚🔠™️➗ я ставлю патент на псевдоним ephemer (эфемер) он будет действовать от начала создания дневника и срок его вечный. если увижу или узнаю об использовании данного псевдонима, попрошу его сменить.
❤1🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @vickrqm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ArtemiusNeut · 471 post𝘿𝙍𝙐𝙂 𝙂𝙍𝘼𝙉𝙂𝙀𝙍
@drug_H_G · 81 post𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐌𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑ᶠʳᵃᶰᵏᶦᵉ
@franchermione · 891 post𝗟𝗶𝗮𝗻 ᴸᵒᵛᵉ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗿||#итальяночка
@LianConfrer · 1201 postclosed 𝙇𝙐𝙉𝘼 𝙇𝙊𝙑𝙀𝙂𝙊𝙊𝘿.
@LUNA67GOOD · 561 post— 𝐏𝐔𝐑𝐒𝐔𝐄𝐃. || 𝐀.𝐉.
@pursaj · 1341 postFrozen ``𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐃 𝐖𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐋𝐄𝐘 ||#ᴿᵉᵛᵒᵒ``
@Ronald_weasley_rev · 1191 post𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐎𝐃𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐍𝐎𝐓𝐓 #серый
@theodorenottyy · 2121 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vickrqm named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙆𝙧𝙪𝙢/𝘦𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳” (@vickrqm), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vickrqm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.