Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vibe Invest

Channel

Vibe Invest

@vibe_invest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,458subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160128468
TypeChannel
Username@vibe_invest
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vibe_invest

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4581,4791,468.51 September 2026 — 1,479 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,479 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,470 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,469 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,467 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,458 subscribers1 September 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 17 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,455–1,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:191,458-9
14 Sept 2026, 17:191,467-2
11 Sept 2026, 04:371,469-1
6 Sept 2026, 17:201,470-9
2 Sept 2026, 07:351,479no change
1 Sept 2026, 11:301,479first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532121510964783577318498.9%
custom 532352520934759570121.08%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vibe_invest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 March 2025 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC94 viewsread 1 September 2026

What are 🎁gifts in Telegram and do they have material value? Gifts in TG are primarily 💻digital code... Is code material? Here, everyone will find their own answer... For me, code is primarily value... 🤠 Moreover, gifts are emotions... for the most part - positive ⚡️energy... And 😊positive energy is already spiritual value... Haters will say: - You write this way because you are stuck in this damn casino yoursel…

7 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC210 viewsread 1 September 2026

💎Ґем? Мабуть ніколи не продам… - Ідеальний монохром; - Ідеальний символ на фоні, типу USA, як світовий поліцейський… А ще по знаку зодіаку я «Терези». Планую залишити на багато років… можливо навіть на все життя. Вважаю цей подарунок одним з найцінніших як в моїй, так і загальній колекції 🗽Liberty Figure https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-28975

9 Jul 2025, 19:18 UTC≈1,620 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Наткнувся на пост від @ghwnd. Враховуючи таку інформацію, якщо вийдуть подарунки від Снуп Дога, то двічі подумайте перед їх покупкою.

custom 53212151096478357737

9 Jul 2025, 18:56 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Снуп Дог підтверджує теорію про вихід авторських подарунків.

9 Jul 2025, 18:47 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026

І це той самий вихід на захід? Вихід на американський ринок? Слова зайві… Це або дуже погано, або настільки погано, що аж добре. https://youtu.be/sknGyx2vRg4?si=ZmDZg1gDFPbwjxuu

custom 53212151096478357734

5 Jul 2025, 00:44 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 1 September 2026

Вчора вийшли 🎁подарунки в честь Дня незалежності 🇺🇸США і одразу хочеться відмітити 2 моменти. 1. Всі боти по автозакупці подарунків «вмерли», проблема була на стороні 💬Telegram. Скоріше за все це буде виправлено перед випуском нових подарунків. 2. Цього разу мене виручив бот @giftalert_raff_bot. Розробник зробив додаток для Appstore і Google Play, який сповіщає вас про появу нових подарунків голосним звуком будильн…

1 Jul 2025, 18:27 UTC849 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

В 💎Telegram вийшло оновлення. Тепер у вас може бути баланс на акаунті не лише в ⭐️зірках, а і напряму в 🤑TON. Для цього на 🏴‍☠️ fragment.com зʼявився пункт For Sponsors в розділі Ads. Там ви можете поповнити свій акаунт напряму в TON. Як на мене це чудова новина, яка скоріш за все незабаром дасть можливість купляти подарунки, стікери та інше в Telegram за TON без використання зірок. Це в свою чергу вирішить пробле…

30 Jun 2025, 19:54 UTC686 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Хтось отримав стікери з нової колекції 🖼DOGS UNLEASHED в @sticker_bot ? Бо я вже думав бити тривогу. Коли було близько 30к учасників я був на 241 місці (якщо зайти в технічну частину сайту). Я був впевнений, що отримаю стікери. Далі бачу, що я на жаль не отримав нічого, а в результаті таки отримав. 🤦‍♂️ Саша Notcoin, допрацюй там все, бо нерви не залізні. Але в цілому круто, я витратив 1 TON (близько 3$), а найниж…

12 Jun 2025, 14:40 UTC≈1,010 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Купив нові стікери називається. Я не один такий. Народ бунтує.

custom 53212151096478357734custom 53235252093475957012

3 Jun 2025, 21:07 UTC≈1,560 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

На ❤️ Portals вчора ввели приємний бонус. При переведенні подарунка з свого аккаунта на маркет отримуєш 0.1 TON, а якщо подарунок був на іншому маркеті для торгівлі, то 0.2 TON. В мене зараз більше 1500 подарунків, але багато з них ще чекають на покращення, тому вдалося «завезти» їх не так багато, але свої 9.4 TON (приблизно 30$ на даний момент) я отримав. За подарунки, які були куплені мною на інших маркетах була…

custom 53212151096478357735

27 May 2025, 18:28 UTC≈1,660 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Творець 🪙MAJOR ⚡️Roxman буквально тільки що запустив власний маркет подарунків ❤️ Portals, щоб створити конкуренцію іншим маркетам. Я сподівався, що торгівля в ньому буде лише за токени $MAJOR, але виявилося, що торгівля буде лише за 💎TON. Подивимося, що з цього вийде в результаті і чи зможе він створити конкуренцію Tonnel маркету. Зараз перші 10 днів торгівлі в ❤️ Portals з 0% комісією.

custom 53212151096478357736

21 Apr 2025, 21:19 UTC≈8,760 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Все добре. Всі зірки повернули. Неочікувано швидко і коректно зроблено повернення. 🦾

custom 532121510964783577317

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vibe_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Not Contest
@not_contest · 36,122
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vibe Invest” (@vibe_invest), 1,458 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vibe_invest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.