Всем привет! Меня зовут Вика и я мастер пирсинга в Санкт-Петербурге.
10 000+ выполненных проколов и довольных клиентов.
Пирсинг • микродермалы • подбор и замена украшений
Украшения • заживление • уход за пирсингом
📍 Санкт-Петербург
Запись: @vimameeva
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
18 measurements spanning 54 days, net +9,290. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 17:15
10,325
-56
4 Nov 2026, 18:46
10,381
-97
3 Nov 2026, 22:14
10,478
-89
2 Nov 2026, 23:36
10,567
-145
2 Nov 2026, 01:41
10,712
-261
31 Oct 2026, 22:17
10,973
+8,280
29 Oct 2026, 02:48
2,693
+936
26 Oct 2026, 01:40
1,757
+370
23 Oct 2026, 06:46
1,387
+203
19 Oct 2026, 22:40
1,184
+20
17 Oct 2026, 08:01
1,164
+8
14 Oct 2026, 02:06
1,156
+162
5 Oct 2026, 00:02
994
-14
25 Sept 2026, 14:20
1,008
-12
17 Sept 2026, 04:58
1,020
-12
13 Sept 2026, 12:56
1,032
-3
12 Sept 2026, 06:22
1,035
no change
12 Sept 2026, 05:47
1,035
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.91%
avg views ÷ 10,325 subscribers
Avg views / post
403
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
32 (8 September 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
8,065
Reactions total
394
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 20:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,340
Videos
≈731
Links
≈64
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
535 reactions across 30 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5408933228188839560
88
16.4%
custom 5424790006927478179
81
15.1%
custom 5409254620591592999
77
14.4%
custom 5238171616331974663
55
10.3%
custom 5278282496297954698
47
8.79%
custom 5255987862230282005
44
8.22%
custom 5305341069435622873
34
6.36%
custom 5420346953454103382
29
5.42%
custom 5411591087095583432
20
3.74%
custom 5325875252243229264
17
3.18%
custom 5411423209708886267
16
2.99%
custom 5456168496826173622
10
1.87%
custom 5379586743152434738
9
1.68%
custom 5199621579020980706
8
1.50%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vi_mameeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨Прокол крыла носа: один пирсинг — десятки настроений
Собрала подборку, которая отлично показывает, насколько по-разному может выглядеть один и тот же прокол в зависимости от украшения.
Миниатюрный кристалл — для аккуратного сияния. Звезда или необычная фигурная накрутка — когда хочется детали с характером. Кольцо с камнями — для более заметного акцента. А тёмные вставки добавляют образу контраста. 🩶
Листайте подб…
Правильный ответ: МИФ ❌
Первичное украшение действительно часто устанавливают с запасом по длине — это необходимо на случай отёка в первые этапы заживления.
Когда отёк спадает, может потребоваться даунсайз — замена украшения на более короткое. Но это не значит, что стоит делать его самостоятельно.
Прокол в этот момент ещё продолжает заживать, и неаккуратная замена может травмировать канал. Кроме того, важно правил…
Если украшение в свежем проколе слишком длинное, его можно самостоятельно заменить на более короткое, как только спадёт отёк
-Миф76%
-Правда27%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Прокол Daith.
Особенно красиво здесь работает форма: вытянутые кристаллы напоминают лепестки, а центральные камни добавляют сияния 🤍
Тот случай, когда Daith становится украшением сам по себе — нежно, изящно и очень красиво при любом освещении
А мы с мужем официально завершили ремонт, всё подготовили к открытию и уже приняли первого клиента! ❤️
Теперь с нетерпением ждём фотографа, чтобы наконец показать вам результат нашей работы!
И только вдумайтесь: с момента аренды помещения прошло всего 14 дней! ✨
Пока мы вносим последние штрихи в ремонт нашей новой студии, решили с Кристиной не терять времени и заняться стерилизацией украшений ✨
Потихоньку готовим всё к открытию, наводим порядок и продумываем каждую мелочь, чтобы совсем скоро встречать вас в новом пространстве 🩶
Осталось совсем немного!
Свободные окошки 03.11.2026
-13:35;
-17:00;
-19:40.
Если давно хотели новый прокол, заменить украшение или добавить что-то новое — самое время записаться🦋
Пиши в личные сообщения, подберём удобное время 💌
Минимализм или максимум? ✨
Как собрать пирсинг-композицию под свой стиль
Кому-то достаточно одного аккуратного камня, а кому-то хочется цепочек, колец, подвесок и много блеска. И оба варианта могут выглядеть 🔥
Главное в красивой пирсинг-композиции — не количество проколов, а то, как они работают вместе.
Если хочется минимализма — выбираем небольшие украшения, простые формы и оставляем больше «воздуха» между акцент…
Мне настолько сильно понравилась Little Nightmares 3, что я просто не удержалась и купила первую и вторую части! 🎮🩶
Кажется, я конкретно подсела на эту атмосферу… Теперь хочется пройти всю серию!
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @vi_mameeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если украшение в свежем проколе слишком длинное, его можно самостоятельно заменить на более короткое, как только спадёт отёк
-Миф76%
-Правда27%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Чем чаще обрабатывать свежий прокол, тем быстрее он заживёт
Миф82%
Правда18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Level_Up Piercing | Пирсинг • Микродермалы СПБ / Питер” (@vi_mameeva), 10,325 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vi_mameeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.