Channel
@vexo_capital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,666subscribers
-110 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054286341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vexo_capital |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vexo_capital |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:49 | 4,666 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 4,674 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 4,684 | -16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 4,700 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 4,712 | -29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 4,741 | -34 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 4,775 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 4,776 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
875 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 139 | 15.9% | |
| 💯 | 131 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 125 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 115 | 13.1% | |
| ❤ | 80 | 9.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 79 | 9.03% | |
| 🎉 | 72 | 8.23% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 7.66% | |
| 🤩 | 67 | 7.66% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 875 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤖 The degen era is quietly ending! Watch the tape, not the timeline hype. The market's center of gravity is moving from gambling to machines. Here is the shift, in plain terms. ⬇️ ON THE WAY OUT The memecoin lottery as a strategy. "Edge" that means being early and lucky on the exit. Loud calls, rented conviction, rent money on a coin flip. ⬆️ ON THE WAY IN Automated, systematic strategies taking the real volume. D…
🧨 A rug pull is not an accident, it is a script with a schedule. Here is its whole lifespan, start to vanish, so you can recognize it while it is still breathing. DAY 1 The launch. Slick site, eye-catching APR, a Telegram already "buzzing" with paid hype. 🚩 Yield nobody can actually explain. WEEK 3 The inflation. TVL is pumped to look enormous and safe, often with the team's own or borrowed funds. 🚩 Size presented …
❤1
The macro spotlight is on Frankfurt this week, with the ECB Interest Rate Decision setting the tone for the global rate path. A lighter data calendar leaves room for corporate earnings, as Alphabet and Tesla kick off Big Tech reporting on Wednesday after hours. U.K. inflation and a set of preliminary U.S. prints round out the week. Here is what's ahead (UTC): 📊 ADP Employment Change (weekly) — Tue, Jul 21, 12:15 📊 U…
❤1
📮 Instead of predicting, let us just watch one thing move across three snapshots: what "earning yield on crypto" looked like, looks like, and will look like. 2021 · the wild version Yield meant a banner that said "20%, guaranteed." No custodian named. No reserves shown. You trusted a logo and hoped. Most of it did not survive contact with a down market. 2025 · the cleanup Regulation started biting (MiCA in Europe, …
❤2❤🔥1💯1
⏳ "I'll just leave it in stablecoins for now" Fair. But "for now" has a price, and here is the math nobody runs. Say you hold $10,000, sitting idle! 📉 Inflation quietly erodes purchasing power. At a rough 3% a year, that idle $10,000 buys about $9,700 worth of goods after 12 months. You did not lose dollars, you lost ground. That is the silent cost of "for now." Now put the same $10,000 to work. 📈 In a transparen…
❤2❤🔥1
🧠 Time for a 20-second test! A platform is pitching you a yield product, one line below is the real red flag --> which one? 📊 POLL: Which is the actual warning sign? 🅐 "Audited by a third party" 🅑 "18% APR, guaranteed" 🅒 "Assets held with a qualified custodian" 🅓 "Yield comes from basis and lending" VOTE FIRST THEN READ ON The answer: 🅑. "Guaranteed" is the tell. No market-based yield is guaranteed. Rates move wit…
❤2💯1
Posted without readable text
❤1
🤔 "Which pool should I be in?" It depends on what you are holding and what you can stomach. Here is the straight comparison. WHAT YOU HOLD 💵 Stablecoin pool: dollar-denominated. Your principal does not swing with the market. 💠 ETH pool: ETH-denominated. Your principal moves with ETH, up and down. WHERE THE YIELD COMES FROM 💵 Stablecoin: basis and overcollateralized lending on dollar assets. 💠 ETH: a basis-and-lendi…
👍10🤩8❤🔥7💯7🥰6
🌙 You were asleep. The market was not. Here is the overnight log from the desk, timestamps in UTC. Yield does not keep office hours. 23:10 Asian session opens. Funding ticks up on major perps as leverage builds into the Tokyo morning. 00:40 Basis widens on a large-cap pair. Added to the delta-neutral position, still fully hedged on direction. 02:15 A counterparty's spread looks off. Trimmed exposure there, rotated i…
🎉15❤14🥰14👍12😍11
🗒 FIELD NOTES · MID-JULY Not predictions. Just the read from the screens. › PRICE BTC back above $64K after dipping near $58K in June. ~6% bounce off the lows. › DRIVER Less a crypto catalyst, more a broad risk-on repricing as July Fed-hike odds softened. › CONTEXT June was rough. Record outflows from Bitcoin ETFs. The tone shift matters. › UNDER THE SURFACE Open interest rising with price → more leverage, more liqu…
❤10🎉10🥰10😍8💯6
😴 Your income can be passive but the yield behind it never is! WHAT YOU SEE A number that grows, hands off, nothing to do. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS (24/7) 1️⃣A desk running delta-neutral strategies across venues. 2️⃣Rebalancing as funding shifts. 3️⃣Monitoring counterparties. 4️⃣Cutting exposure when one looks shaky. 5️⃣Tightening before macro events. 🎯 Here is why it matters: Truly passive yield, with nobody working…
🤩11👍10🥰9❤8🎉8
⏳ Capital sitting still is not neutral. Every day it does nothing, inflation does something. Idle is not safe. Idle is a slow leak. While your stablecoins wait, the desk works: basis captured, yield accruing block by block. That is the difference between money resting and money working. Transparent APR you can trace. Regulated custody, your assets stay yours. No lockups you did not choose. No direction bet require…
😍15🤩10🔥9🥰8👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vexo_capital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 928,279 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vexo Capital | Announcements” (@vexo_capital), 4,666 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vexo_capital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.