9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,318–18,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 06:48
18,320
-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:15
18,321
-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:31
18,324
-3
10 Aug 2026, 03:01
18,327
-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:51
18,328
-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:23
18,334
-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:06
18,335
+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:16
18,331
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:40
18,331
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 18,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,750
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
22 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
60,510
Reactions total
1,039
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈1,150
Links
≈1,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 28s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
989 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
344
34.8%
❤
265
26.8%
🔥
187
18.9%
😁
76
7.68%
👏
37
3.74%
💯
22
2.22%
👀
13
1.31%
🤔
13
1.31%
👌
9
0.91%
🤷♂
8
0.809%
🙏
7
0.708%
👎
4
0.404%
⚡
3
0.303%
🫡
1
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,039reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
9.09%
2 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,750
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,820
over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquvVSvn
1
25 July 2026
25 July 2026
2VtzqwJqN89
1
30 July 2026
30 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вход в дом .. через бассейн???
И это самый быстрый проход из гаража!
Въезд на участок находится на уровне цокольного этажа. Здесь же - 2 гаража на 6 м/м и лифт, который ведет на террасу с infinity-бассейном. Зайти в дом можно через дверь .. или портальные раздвижки в столовой.
Для любителей ходьбы есть, конечно, и роскошная лестница с аркой в стиле “Санта Барбара”, но думаю, что именно лифт будет самым востребованн…
Входной портал в дом высотой в 2 этажа
Это, пожалуй, самая масштабная входная группа из всех, что я видел в частном доме - огромная арка во всю высоту фасада.
В дом ведет уже скромная с виду дверь, открывается по отпечатку пальца, причем автоматически. Очень удобно, когда возвращаешься домой с полными руками покупок. Хотя актуален ли такой сценарий для жителей элитного дома?))
Как вам архитектура?
Смотреть полный…
Как размывается ответственность у подрядчиков
Одна из головных болей заказчиков строительства - отсутствие единого ответственного за весь процесс.
Думаю, почти каждый пережил это на уровне ремонта в квартире, когда дизайнер задумал одно, а отделочники реализовали другое. То ли что-то не продумали, то ли не поняли друг друга, то ли в нужный момент не проконтролировали и не поймали. Заказчику это не важно. Результат …
Мраморный радиус
Иногда роскошь - не в дорогом материале, а в искусной работе с ним. Посмотрите, как тонко выполнены полукруглые элементы из мрамора Arabescato, они словно "приобнимают" ванну. “Плитка” идеально выложена по радиусу, и при этом получается единый, цельный рисунок.
Ставьте лайк работе мастера!
➡️ Этот дом продается. Запрос информации в ТГ / WA +7-915-440-03-14.
Канал VDT - @vescoalex
Чат VDT - @vdtc…
Комментарии дороже бриллиантов
После обзора ювелирной комнаты комментарии оказались не менее ценными, чем ее потенциальное содержимое :)
Какой рассмешил вас больше всего? Или появились новые?)
Если снова наберется 500+ тысяч просмотров, сделаем ремикс на ремикс!
Канал VDT - @vescoalex
Чат VDT - @vdtcomments
15-метровый бассейн - редкость даже для элитки
Кажется, я нашел спа-комплекс, в котором можно зависнуть на весь день и не заметить. Здесь есть все, что нужно для красивой жизни:
- 15-метровый бассейн,
- Джакузи на 4 человека,
- Сауна, хаммам,
- Снегогенератор,
- Две душевые,
- Зона отдыха с лежаками,
- Лаунж-зона с ТВ и терраса для большого стола,
- Барная стойка с холодильником,
- Две террасы в единый уровень с уч…
Дискриминация в гардеробных
Или как 1 м², стал поводом для шуток
Мы уже привыкли, что в домах за миллиарды в каждой спальне есть свой гардеробная, а в мастер-блоке - часто даже две.
И тем не менее, гардеробная гардеробной - рознь! Такого масштаба, наполнения и внимания к деталям я, пожалуй, еще не видел.
- Женская часть 38 м2 - как бутик: открытые системы хранения, стеклянные витрины, туалетный столик у панорамног…
Как продать элитный дом за 3 месяца?
Расскажу реальный кейс объекта за 350+ млн руб.
Подавляющее большинство собственников склонны изначально переоценивать свои дома и квартиры, и это нормально.
К рыночной цене можно идти двумя путями:
1. Через поэтапное снижение в процессе продаж, что принципиально неверно - ведь сразу на старте вы теряете внимание самой теплой аудитории, так называемый отложенный спрос. Это поку…
VDT vs ТЕАТР
Покажу вам бэкстейдж с очень необычной съемки. Мне даже пришлось полностью преобразиться, чтобы соответствовать задумке сценаристов!
Готовим настоящее архитектурное расследование! Погонь и перестрелок не будет, но подозреваемые, улики и главное - раскрытие истинного виновника происшествия - гарантирую!
Чем закончилось “Дело на миллиард” узнаете уже в новом деловом сезоне, ближе к середине сентября 😉
Спа-комплекс с уровнем безопасности на максималках
Настоящий уровень премиальной недвижимости часто раскрывается именно в деталях - тех, что остаются незаметными на первый взгляд.
Вот взять хотя бы бассейн - длина 15 м, ширина 4 м, стандартная вытянутая форма.
Но что же мы видим при близком рассмотрении?
- закругленные края, очень сложная работа по керамограниту,
- плавный вход, ступени с такими же закруглениями …
Оригинал или ИИ?))
Как думаете, что снимаем? На кого похож? 😉
😁23🤔9🤷♂7❤4🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @vescoalex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 168,900 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Строительство и бизнес @RussiaBuild · 110,198 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VDT Алексея Аверьянова” (@vescoalex), 18,320 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vescoalex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.