Channel
@vertoni_nails_chem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,273subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002005950646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vertoni_nails_chem |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vertoni_nails_chem |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 3,273 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 3,281 | -6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 3,287 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 3,292 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 3,293 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 3,295 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 3,302 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 3,305 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 3,307 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 3,306 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 3,310 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 3,309 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 3,309 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
100 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 16.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 13.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новинка 😅 - #мягкиесистемы. Обсудим? Сейчас много курсов и материалов с такой маркетинговой подачей, и это неплохо, но это не новая техника и не новые материалы, так покрывали всегда. Я сама чаще всего работаю именно в этой технике, не густыми и не жёсткими гелями, поэтому половина гелей во всех моих гайдах, с самого первого 2022 года, именно под неё.
❤20
Мой чат для мастеров в ВК, там я вижу сообщения почти сразу, работает без VPN. Сюда захожу, отвечаю, не теряюсь, просто реже, так как часто ТГ подвисает совсем. https://vk.me/join/SITPAfa7C/hy26S6AS9r2XyRH7wYmf8qoEk=
‼️Начало в карусели☝🏻 4️⃣ Так как ожоги и аллергии - не страшилка, а наша реальность, сейчас набирает силу тренд на «голые ногти» и «лечебные» лаки. Происходит это потому, что ожоги пугают и страшно делать покрытие, так как ошибочно думают, что все материалы одинаково опасны, хотя это далеко не так. Опасность представляют сильно кислые базы (но лакмус их покажет), и некоторые компоненты составов. Шарить в химии не…
🔥11❤2
❗️Продолжение, начало ☝🏻 🔹ГК в составах реально круто, даже если его там капля. Это смесь пептидов и аминокислот, содержит цистеин, с низкой молекулярной массой. Он умудряется проникать в структуру кератина, минимизируя повреждения и удерживая влагу. Так мочить или пилить? Давайте честно: ацетон безопасен для организма в целом, но он беспощадно растворяет липиды и сушит кератин. Мой вердикт: отправлять ногти в «отмо…
❤24👍8🔥5🥰2
❗️Начало в карусели☝🏻 Если учесть тот факт, что в лаках компоненты чаще всего хуже, чем в хороших гелях, то отказ от гелей в пользу лаков из-за их якобы безопасности вообще смешон🤦🏼♀️ Если уходить с дешманской кислой и красной на лакмусе базы на норм лак (5-7фри), то, да, это безопасней, хим ожога и аллергии не будет... но если ваш мастер шарит в составах и химии нейл-материалов, значит ваш уф-маникюр, тем-более е…
❤23👍5
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @vertoni_nails_chem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нейл-химик Вильданова Наталья” (@vertoni_nails_chem), 3,273 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vertoni_nails_chem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.