Channel
@vertoletski
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,953subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002016824791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vertoletski |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vertoletski |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 3,953 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 3,960 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 3,964 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (3 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,010 |
| Reactions total | 604 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,533 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 1,533 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,533reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вертаны, там РКН опять прошёлся ураганом по ВПН-сервисам и положил десятки из них К счасть, мы подготовились к новой волне блокировок заранее, поэтому VertPN в строю и готов помогать вам получать доступ в свободный интернет. Активируй бесплатный день в VertPN, а если сервис зайдёт — оформляй годовой план с выгодой до 80% 🤤 Ну и не забывай про промокод CUCKOLD в честь самого прогрессивного мужа в мире, что получить …
👎66
Чтобы вы оценили гениальный полёт фантазии Семецкого На оригинальном кадре древний обладатель магического артефакта Алый Немес (сойджак в халате) вместе со своим напарником Лютым Волком (ящерка в нацистской форме) подписывают указ о создании концлагерей для перевоспитания фурри-либерах. В это вселенной нацисты добрые, чужие Гигера тоже добрые, а злые — либерахи. По причине неприятия межвидовых браков..
👎87
Photo, posted without a caption
👎94
Сойджакированные версии персонажей Семецкого с прошлого стрима За которых автор получил бан в группе и теперь вряд ли сможет стать инвестором :(
👎125
Опять залетел на небольшое камео в большой ролик Антона про (полу)забытую классику PS Vita Помню, в своё время она меня затянула ламповой атмосферой и прикольным визуалом, но очень быстро заебала однообразным геймплейным гриндом... Но вспомнить ту самую Сони, у которой была своя портативка, свои гиммики в этой портативке и даже настоящие эксклюзивы, всегда приятно! СМОТРЕТЬ ОБЗОР
👎61
Прощай, легенда Хипстерская середина десятых утопала в ретровейвовом неоне, но большая часть сцены была, скажем прямо, однообразным говном. Но альбом Кавинского Outrun возвышался над этим морем одинаковых синтов красно-фиолетовым титаном. Именно альбом, а не порядком заебавший (хоть и всё ещё великий) Nightcall. Абсолютная классика, рекомендую к прослушиванию всем (кроме одной ебучей рэп-песни) And now you know how…
👎171
К 2026 году тема Dendy и Steepler уже затёрта и перетёрта всеми, кому не лень. В том числе и мной — в специальной главе для третьего тома книги «История Nintendo» и в её дополненной версии на DTF. Из нового за последние годы подтвердилась лишь история о похищении одного из учредителей Steepler бандитскими группировками. Я не упоминал её в своих текстах, потому что источники были крайне ненадёжными, а сама история усп…
👎39
Это было легендарно Стрим посетил сам Добрый Зверь Кинбис, пригласил застримить все шесть частей сериала-пРАвды перед премьерой седьмой, но теперь мне нужно за полгода найти фулсет самых редких фишек от Чупа Кэпс...
👎146
Сможет ли свинья одолеть круглика? Не могу сказать про всех, но свинья с фотки точно не сможет
👎115
Ну что, вот и смерть физических носителей С 2028 Sony не будут выпускать игр на дисках
👎172
А вы читали книгу «Приключения Шерлока Холмса в информационном обществе» (автор Виталий Шнейдеров)? Я читал) Любопытный фанфик, погружающий в IT 1993 года)
👎64
Photo, posted without a caption
👎68
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vertoletski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игхавой Buy Day | Босс Вертолёт” (@vertoletski), 3,953 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vertoletski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.