The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
Вертикаль
@vertikal22
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001509321884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vertikal22 |
| Created | 1 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vertikal22 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 65 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 65 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 144
- Videos
- 52
- Links
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 37s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2022 to 26 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Навальный говорил Л. Волкову и В. Ашуркову - не надо отмазываться, но они как в известном анекдоте "Мыши плакали и кололись,но продолжали грызть кактус". В комментариях вся суть баталии
Кто то скажет - комментарии излишни Другие скажут поговоркой - скажи мне кто твой друг... Третьи отметят, что после скандала с Леонидом Волковым (решал денежные и политические вопросы за спиной коллег) Марии Певчих лишь остаётся фотографироваться с биомусором Толоконниковой или просто признаться, что она агент Ми6
Продолжение истории... Сначало выяснилось, что Леонид Волков создал, так называемый, санкционный список ФБК (он же Список 6000) исключительно для зарабатывания на желании российских олигархов выйти из него (яркий пример - ситуация с Фридманом, который видимо взял Леонида за одно место и не дал ему юлить, так как на кону своя финансовая свобода). Теперь издание Медуза, пишет, что в поддержку Фридмана также дважды по…
Ч. Т. Д., старушонка Певчих, сумасшедший новосибирский профессор Миронов из-за бугра и хлюпик Волков, расправив плечи после бессонной ночи, вырывания волос на голове, и чтобы не объяснять причины тупого поступка Леонида, набросились на Венедиктова. Маша, он может и старый, но всем вам троим не по зубам😁 Ведь именно Он вас разложил, не первый раз, как детей
Remember forever... Большая политическая ошибка Леонида Волкова не должна быть забыта, как реальными сторонниками Навального (которые берут на веру любые заклинания Алексея), так и системными либералами, ну и конечно власть имущими (этими в первую очередь). Как говорил сам Алексей, бей в одну точку. Надеемся ни у кого не возникает сомнений, что столь быстрое признание Волковым подлинности своей подписи под документом…
👍2🤮1
Photo, posted without a caption
Волков и его ошибки... Помнится в 2021 г. провёл последнюю "эпичную" акцию протеста, назвав её со слюнтяем Ждановым - последняя битва между добром и нейтралитетом (она была похожа по численности на фееричную по своей дебильности акцию с фонариками). Генезис ФБК изначально происходит из лицемерия основателя организации - Навального. ФБК само изначально создавалось, как организация для революции. Но для своей аудитории…
Это пишет человек с 6.4к подписчиков. Мания величия никак не отпустит экс парламентария жулика, который ещё в далеком 2014 в женском платье через границу бежал в США.
😁1
Все, что надо знать о российской оппозиции. Как сказал Макл Наки: Сталина и Повара на них не хватает
Действия Польши явно "отдавали" постановкой спектакля, где как по команде Клоун Зеленский кричит - воры, а поляки не разбираясь подхватывают. Но сонный Джо почему то в этот момент не спал и показал кто у шавок хозяин. Итог: государства прокладки спалились, показав, что на каждом даже не явном фоле противника, они играют заранее отрепетированный сценарий своих вассалов, по аналогии со стандартными действиями футболист…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vertikal22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,012,104 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вертикаль” (@vertikal22), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vertikal22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.