Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гражданин Вершинин

Channel

Гражданин Вершинин

@vershininlive

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

345subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697646635
TypeChannel
Username@vershininlive
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vershininlive

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

345350347.57 August 2026 — 350 subscribers8 August 2026 — 350 subscribers8 September 2026 — 348 subscribers16 September 2026 — 347 subscribers1 October 2026 — 345 subscribers7 August 20261 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 55 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 344–351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 14:38345-2
16 Sept 2026, 20:17347-1
8 Sept 2026, 04:36348-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:48350no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:36350first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9329.2%
🔥5316.7%
❤‍🔥4915.4%
🤣237.23%
🤔226.92%
😢185.66%
👍103.14%
💋82.52%
💔82.52%
👏61.89%
👌51.57%
💩51.57%
😁51.57%
🌚41.26%
😍41.26%
🕊20.629%
🗿10.314%
😨10.314%
🤨10.314%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 4 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2025, 01:20 UTC962 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Искусственный интеллект в медицине: революция в диагностике и лечении. Как ИИ меняет медицину Искусственный интеллект становится незаменимым помощником врачей по всему миру. Современные алгоритмы способны анализировать огромные массивы медицинских данных быстрее и точнее человека, что открывает новые возможности в диагностике и лечении. Диагностика заболеваний Медицинские ИИ-системы уже сегодня помогают: — Анализи…

❤9💩4👍3👏1🔥1

3 Jun 2025, 03:26 UTC774 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мифы и факты о витамине С Витамин С – один из самых обсуждаемых в обществе витаминов. Давайте разберёмся, что действительно важно знать о нём. Факт №1: Витамин С не лечит простуду Множество исследований, включая данные Cochrane Library, показывают, что приём витамина С не сокращает длительность простуды у большинства людей. Однако у спортсменов может немного уменьшить риск развития респираторных инфекций. Факт №2…

❤11🔥5🤔2

21 May 2025, 02:19 UTC734 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ученые из Университетского колледжа Лондона (University College London, UCL) впервые засняли процесс формирования сердца млекопитающего (на видео). Для этого клетки эмбриона мыши, помеченные флуоресцентными маркерами, фотографировали каждые две минуты в течение 40 часов. Исследование показало, что при формировании сердца клетки движутся не хаотично, как считалось ранее, а в определенном порядке. По мнению ученых, …

❤‍🔥9👏5🔥4🌚2

19 Apr 2025, 10:03 UTC953 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фото заряжено на передачу бесценного опыта 🗣 👨‍⚕️ Гражданин Вершинин →

❤‍🔥23❤10🔥8

7 Apr 2025, 07:58 UTC≈1,110 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Зарегистрирована первая российская вакцина против вируса папилломы человека (ВПЧ). Вакцина «Цегардекс», разработанная фармкомпаниями «Нанолек» и «Комбиотех», предназначена для профилактики четырех, наиболее онкогенных, типов ВПЧ — 6, 11, 16 и 18, от этих же типов вируса защищает «Гардасил» от американской MSD — передает Forbes. В пресс-службе «Нанолека» сообщили, что российская вакцина успешно прошла клинические ис…

❤9👍7🔥6

16 Mar 2025, 15:52 UTC≈1,140 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие дамы! Если мужчина, рассыпаясь в комплиментах, говорит вам, что вы похожи на саму Венеру, не спешите обольщаться. Уточните несколько важных моментов! Вполне возможно, что подразумевается Виллендорфская Венера… 👨‍⚕️ Гражданин Вершинин →

🤣21🔥8💔3🤨1😨1

8 Mar 2025, 12:31 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Американская биотехнологическая компания Colossal Biosciences, планирующая возродить шерстистого мамонта, вывела 38 шерстистых мышей, обладающих характерной для мамонта шерстью и ускоренным липидным обменом «вымершего зверя, который помогал ему выжить в последний ледниковый период»; выведение таких мышей стало результатом «сложного генного редактирования» — передает Time. По словам гендиректора компании Бена Ламма (…

❤11🔥3🌚1🤔1

3 Mar 2025, 14:41 UTC973 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Умер австралиец Джеймс Харрисон (James Harrison), который становился донором крови и плазмы 1173 раза и тем самым спас жизни 2,4 миллиона детей — передает служба крови австралийского Красного Креста. Плазма крови Харрисона содержала редкие антитела, предотвращающие резус-конфликт беременной и плода, который обычно приводит к гемолитической болезни у младенцев и может вызывать внутриутробную гибель плода. Харрисону …

😢18❤‍🔥5💔5🔥2💩1

10 Feb 2025, 16:50 UTC≈1,360 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я знал, что должно быть какое-то достойное обоснование этому! 👨‍⚕️ Гражданин Вершинин →

❤‍🔥11😁5❤3🤔1

6 Feb 2025, 11:20 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ну, и последнее. Чья работа?

  1. Клод Моне41%
  2. Эдуард Мане59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2025, 11:19 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Портрет месье и мадам [фамилия]», 1860 г.

❤9🔥3🤔2

6 Feb 2025, 11:15 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Чья рука и чей родственник? Это сложнее…

  1. Клод Моне56%
  2. Эдуард Мане44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vershininlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Feb 2025, 11:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz95 voters

Ну, и последнее. Чья работа?

  1. Клод Моне41%
  2. Эдуард Мане59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2025, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz82 voters

Чья рука и чей родственник? Это сложнее…

  1. Клод Моне56%
  2. Эдуард Мане44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2025, 05:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz80 voters

«Лестница в Ветёй» — из-под чьей кисти?

  1. Клод Моне79%
  2. Эдуард Мане21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2025, 05:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz74 voters

Итак, кому принадлежит «Олимпия»? Совсем просто, если придерживаться вышеописанного принципа…

  1. Клод Моне35%
  2. Эдуард Мане65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2025 to 4 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гражданин Вершинин” (@vershininlive), 345 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vershininlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.