Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,062–2,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 12:55
2,139
-2
8 Sept 2026, 14:59
2,141
-1
3 Sept 2026, 02:19
2,142
-5
31 Aug 2026, 01:38
2,147
-2
27 Aug 2026, 16:28
2,149
-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:53
2,151
-1
20 Aug 2026, 23:47
2,152
+2
17 Aug 2026, 15:54
2,150
+7
14 Aug 2026, 14:58
2,143
+21
10 Aug 2026, 20:34
2,122
+48
7 Aug 2026, 18:20
2,074
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:32
2,074
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
92
30.8%
🔥
64
21.4%
👍
60
20.1%
😁
28
9.36%
🤣
14
4.68%
🤔
12
4.01%
❤🔥
8
2.68%
👏
5
1.67%
👀
4
1.34%
🙈
3
1.00%
🤓
3
1.00%
💯
1
0.334%
😱
1
0.334%
🤨
1
0.334%
🤩
1
0.334%
🤬
1
0.334%
🥴
1
0.334%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ФАС выявила брань в рекламе «Застрахуй»
В очередной раз яркий маркетинг «Альфа-банка» разбивается об острые скалы бюрократического айсберга 🧊
ФАС возбудила дело о нарушениях в рекламе Альфа-Банка. Основание - ч. 6 ст. 5 ФЗ «О рекламе» (та самая норма о запрете бранной и неэтичной рекламы).
По утверждениям СМИ, на рекламу пожаловались пенсионеры.
ФАС разоблачила директора стоматологии
Ставропольское УФАС провела проверку в отношении стоматологии, директор которой позиционировал себя как врач-стоматолог высшей квалификации.
Информация о квалификации директора распространялась сразу на 10 сайтах, где было указано, что директор стоматологии является специалистом в области стоматологии, ортопедии, имплантологии и гнатологии. На одном из сайтов даже были размеще…
Якобы первое дело за рекламу в сторис
Тут в интернетах шум о якобы первом деле за рекламу в сторис 😁🥱
что ж, дело не первое, да еще и не новое😉
То самое определение УФАС, о котором трубят повсюду, мы с вами, мои дорогие, разобрали почти 2 месяца назад.
Так что шум отменяем😮💨
Новый ГОСТ для онлайн-образования
В ноябре вступает в силу новый ГОСТ Р 72711-2026, которым определяются требования к дистанционному обучению.
Обязателен ли ГОСТ?
Нет, соблюдение требований ГОСТа носит не обязательный характер, организация может опираться на ГОСТ при оказании услуг, применять ГОСТ или нет - решение добровольное.
На что распространяется
ГОСТ регулирует только дистанционное обучение в области:
• выс…
Что ждет Telegram🔮
Сегодня все СМИ (и не только) обсуждают новости, связанные с уголовным преследованием основателя Telegram Павла Дурова. Общественность обеспокоена дальнейшей судьбой мессенджера.
Как обстоят дела с Telegram сейчас
🟡На данный момент нет информации о том, что в отношении компании, владеющей Telegram, принято решение о ликвидации или запрете деятельности по основаниям терроризма или экстремизма (ка…
Гриф "Коммерческая тайна": решает или нет?
На днях столкнулась с интересным мнением, в соц. сетях один из пользователей упорно доказывал, что если документ не содержит гриф "Коммерческая тайна", то он не подпадает под охрану, а значит - работники могут его свободно распространять. Так ли это на деле? Давайте выясним⬇️
🟡Что говорит закон (ч. 1 ст. 10 ФЗ "О коммерческой тайне")
Закон определяет требования к мерам по …
Суд признал законным увольнение за DeepSeek
Первое судебное решение, в рамках которого суд оценивал правомерность увольнения сотрудника в связи с разглашением коммерческой тайны компании посредством использования ИИ.
Что произошло: Р. работала в компании директором по продажам с доходом около 800 000 руб. и "золотым парашютом" в 5 млн. У работодателя были неоднократные замечания к Р., но последней каплей стала выгр…
Онлайн-торговля: новый порядок возврата качественного товара
В Госдуме на рассмотрении находится законопроект, которым вносятся изменения в ст. 26.1 Закона "О защите прав потребителей" о продаже товаров дистанционным способом.
Что вносит законопроект⬇️
🟡Возврат товара надлежащего качества (кроме маркетплейсов):
• осуществляется покупателем за свой счет любым по его усмотрению способом;
• способ должен обеспечивать…
Реклама без маркировки, на которую пожаловалась администрация
Обычно на рекламу с нарушениями жалуются радеющие граждане, а в этом⬇️ случае дело возбуждено по жалобе администрации.
В сообществе района в ВК несколько раз была опубликована реклама магазина. Согласитесь, довольно сложно не заметить рекламу с таким обилием эмодзи. Так и администрация не смогла пройти мимо и пожаловалась в ФАС.
Итог: возбуждено дело в …
📌Горячая линия юридической помощи в связи с атаками на склад Wildberries.
На базе Торгово-промышленной палаты Краснодарского края совместно с КРО Ассоциации юристов России организована горячая линия юридической помощи для предпринимателей, пострадавших в связи с атаками на склад Wildberries.
Юридическая помощь будет оказана юристами Комитета по правовой поддержке и защите бизнеса ТПП, Хартии основных принципов юрид…
Как вам задачка? 😉
А теперь обещанный ответ ⬇️
Итак, дано:
💛 собрала базу контактов, давших согласие на получение рекламы, затем по этой базе разослал рекламу 💛 и 💛.
ФАС посчитала такую рекламу нарушающей требования ч. 4.1 ст. 14.3 КоАП РФ и оштрафовала компанию на 500 000 руб., поскольку необходимо было получить отдельное согласие на распространение рекламы.
Суд постановление ФАС отменил по следующим основаниям:
…
❤10🔥6👍3👏3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @verkhovskaya_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нет, А должен получить согласие пользователей на отправку рекламы Б и В.88%
Да, А может отправлять рекламу кого угодно.12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@verkhovskaya_law named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Верховская | Юрист” (@verkhovskaya_law), 2,139 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verkhovskaya_law.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.