Channel
@verify_ton_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,084subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002247522106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @verify_ton_en |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 11 July 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/verify_ton_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 3,084 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 3,095 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 3,104 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 3,106 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
346 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 34.4% | |
| 👍 | 119 | 34.4% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 19.4% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 6.65% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 2.02% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.578% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.578% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.289% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.289% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.289% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.289% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.289% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.289% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.289% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2024 to 23 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧐 Key success factors Ever wondered why some projects take off and become successful, while others never make it to the next level? The reasons may be different, but the main thing is strategy and the right approach to development. It is important to understand that successful projects are able to adapt quickly to market changes, analyse data correctly and are not afraid to experiment. Such companies are constantly…
👎1
🚀 Evolution of mini-apps in Telegram Mini-apps have become an important part of the Telegram ecosystem, giving users and developers new ways to interact. 🔗 Blockchain integration With the advent of The Open Network (TON), Telegram has not only strengthened security, but also opened the door for fast and scalable transactions within the platform. ⚙️ Expanding functionality With each update, mini-apps become more so…
👍1
⚡ News Digest! Friends, we have prepared for you a digest of the latest Verify news and more! - Partnership with Guarant Ru. We became a partner of Guarant Ru, a service of secure transactions. - Addition to TON App. We appeared in TON App and also added some new projects. - Updating reviews. We added a handy filter of reviews into positive and negative to the app. 💎 Events related to the TON ecosystem: The Bin…
👍2❤1🔥1
🤝 Partnership with Guarant Ru! Dear friends, we are pleased to inform you about Verify's partnership with Guarant Ru! What is Guarant Ru? Guarant Ru is a guarant service where users can sell any digital goods and services, and the service allows you to guarantee 100% fulfilment of all the terms of the transaction. Together with Guarant Ru you can be sure in the reliability of fulfilment of obligations by the counte…
❤3🔥2🥰1
💯 How does a user rate an app in Verify? In Verify, there are several criteria for users to evaluate apps: Project Description, Target Audience, Roadmap, Smart Contract, Team, Tokenomics ⭐️ Almost every project touches on all of these points as it develops and in our app you can check each of these points, then go to the app itself and see how well the information matches up. Do your analysis and leave your weight…
👍4❤3🔥3
🕓 How soon will the DAO be? We have already discussed the topic of DAO formation in Verify. However, when will we have a transition to a new stage? After all, it is quite difficult to find a full-fledged large DAO around one project in TON. 💡 The formation of the DAO is planned during the development of the community and the involvement of external users, by working with a variety of projects within our catalog of …
👍3❤1🔥1
🧐 Differences from the Telegran Apps Center! Dear users, today we would like to talk about our difference from the Telegram Apps Center application catalog and compare it with Verify on the main points. — The process of getting into the catalog: In Telegram Apps Center, the listing process takes place in a long and complicated way, unlike Verify. If you are a good project, then your application will pass a simple …
❤5🔥3
✅ How do I become a validator? As you remember, we have already discussed on the topic of the validation system. It is important for us to gradually develop a working and stable project verification system! But how do you become the validator and decide the fate of projects? At the moment, everything is quite simple: — You need to be active — Leave constructive and detailed criticism in the application — Show y…
❤5❤🔥1🔥1
💬 Community and project! No project is complete without bugs and always needs a fresh look. Any application and service is constantly evolving and strives to eliminate any possible bugs. However, this process is accelerated with the support of its users! If you find a bug in the application or would like to suggest an idea for the development of the project, then please contact a special support account! 🤝 Your …
❤5🔥3👍1
👍 Recent summary! Dear friends! Our project is developing rapidly and we are glad to summarize the interim results of our work recently! We managed to: — Advance to the semifinals of The Open League Hackathon — Show up in the TON App — Added several new projects to us (including hackathon winners) — Hold a drawing for $ 777 — Add different functionality to the application ⚡We are happy with the current successes, …
❤5🔥3👍2⚡1🌚1
⭐️ How does the project get into Verify? Verify is becoming the knowledge base for projects in the TON ecosystem. Thanks to us, projects have increased credibility and user reach. To get placed on Verify, you need to go to the app and tap "add project+". Next, you will need to fill out a questionnaire and tell us about the project: — Basic information about the project, including the name, short description, websi…
❤4👍4👏3🔥2
🤑 The Open League Hackathon results! The grand $2 million Open League hackathon has come to an end, with over 900 teams and projects participating! Although we only made it to the semifinals, the fervor of developing and improving the platform provided us with a unique experience and unforgettable impressions from the entire event! 💚 The winners in various hackathon categories were: GameFI & Onboarding 1st place …
❤7👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @verify_ton_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 638,521 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@verify_ton_en named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Verify EN” (@verify_ton_en), 3,084 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verify_ton_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.