Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for verdazoseguro2

Channel

verdazoseguro2

@verdazoseguro2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-9,630 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002495127341
TypeChannel
Username@verdazoseguro2
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/verdazoseguro2

Growth

29,6344,8187 August 2026 — 9,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,634 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,595 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,586 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,561 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,542 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,515 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4 subscribers47 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 28 days, net -9,630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 20:214+2
29 Aug 2026, 02:162-9,513
25 Aug 2026, 23:189,515-27
23 Aug 2026, 06:369,542-19
20 Aug 2026, 04:199,561-25
17 Aug 2026, 11:479,586-9
14 Aug 2026, 06:189,595-19
10 Aug 2026, 14:059,614-20
7 Aug 2026, 18:019,634no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:469,634first reading

Engagement

235 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14916.1%
avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
Avg views / post
597
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
188
of 235 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held235 (6 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total112,169
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC358 viewsread 26 August 2026

STAKE 10 DEL DÍA ACERTADÍSIMO JODEEEEER! ✅✅✅ Este viernes 28 de agosto abriremos plazas para acceder al Canal Premium Septiembre. Es que si veis día a día, ¡nos estamos llevando todo en el Canal Premium, dineral tras dineral! 😳💵

25 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC448 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://x.com/pablocaabello/status/2092335390086647988?s=46&t=TtVgAENAV15T1YIvvHCAoA

25 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC668 viewsread 26 August 2026

STAKAZO 10 ✅✅✅✅ Brutal la racha de STAKES 10 acertados que llevamos desde que comenzaron las grandes ligas, ¡acierto tras acierto! 😈 ✅ ¡Este viernes 28 de agosto se abrirán las plazas para acceder al Canal Premium Septiembre!

25 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC644 viewsread 26 August 2026
Photo

APUESTA GRATUITA DEL DÍA🤑🤟🏻 Partido de La Liga entre Valencia vs Real Betis. Buscamos que ambos equipos anoten. 🕢: 21:00 📈: Stake 4

Showing the 12 most recent of 235 posts we hold for @verdazoseguro2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTCAnonymous Poll157 voters

¿Cuál es tu liga favorita? 🤔

  1. La Liga 🇪🇸59%
  2. Premier League 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿43%
  3. Bundesliga 🇩🇪16%
  4. Serie A 🇮🇹6%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

¿Cual es tu bank (dinero en total que tienes para apostar) actual? 🤔

  1. Entre 1€ - 100€61%
  2. Entre 100€ - 500€25%
  3. +500€14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 235 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“verdazoseguro2” (@verdazoseguro2), 4 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verdazoseguro2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.