Channel
@vera_classic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001729843555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vera_classic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vera_classic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 141 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 142 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 142 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 882 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5195294760247501498 | 39 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5192758015123532289 | 31 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5188245327345361858 | 20 | 15.3% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5188241771112440243 | 14 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5193182418021917502 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| custom 5388757121099654540 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| custom 5375421200400924997 | 2 | 1.53% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Затягивала выложить отзыв, все ждала подходящего момента, а его что? А его нет! Предлагаю вам не затягивать с уроками по фортепиано, особенно если это ваша мечта!🤍 Готова взять новых учеников, пока еще не забила весь сезон концертами, успевайте записаться в личку @vera_delmachinskaya
custom 51952947602475014986custom 51882417711124402431custom 51882453273453618581
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51927580151235322892
Я грустила, что мало записала, все больше слушала, а вот оказывается есть еще записи☺️
custom 51927580151235322893custom 53887571210996545403custom 51882417711124402432
Эпизоды из «Прелюдии к воскресенью» № 65 Программа концерта
custom 51882453273453618584👏3custom 53754212004009249972
Была сегодня на концерте «Прелюдия к воскресенью» И вот что думаю: «зачем мне чет вещать, когда уже есть те, кто прекрасно рассказывает!» Мне нравится все: сам материал, подача, голос, речь! (Если вдруг не знаете, срочно посмотрите и сходите на концерт!) С одной стороны завидую, потому что так не могу, а с другой стороны еще раз убеждаюсь, что я хочу именно ИГРАТЬ! Ну могу я….могу рассказать и это будет норм, но э…
custom 51952947602475014985
А билетов все меньше, чему я безмерно радуюсь! Спасибо всем, кто уже идет на концерт! А кто еще ломается, решайтесь скорее пока места не закончились и забирайте свой билетик!
custom 51952947602475014986custom 51927580151235322895custom 51882417711124402433
Уставшая к концу занятий и дня, а вместе с тем оч рада, что готовлюсь к концерту и есть чем позаниматься🥹😍🥰
👏4custom 51882417711124402433custom 51952947602475014983
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51952947602475014984custom 51927580151235322893
Про фортепиано не зря говорят, что это инструмент – оркестр. Его возможности действительно безграничны, и даже крещендо на длинной ноте возможно, если сильно захотеть…) Сам я потихоньку отхожу от фортепиано в пользу основной деятельности, но безумно радуюсь за тех, кто неустанно работает, посвящая свою жизнь этому прекрасному инструменту. 30 августа пойду на концерт, где предстоит внимать шикарную симфоническую муз…
custom 51927580151235322897custom 51882417711124402435custom 51882453273453618584
Приглашаем 30 августа в 16:00 на концерт! 🎉 Подробности и билеты
custom 51927580151235322899👏8custom 51952947602475014986custom 51882453273453618583
Люблю ныть! 1. Поныла 2. Поработала 3. Вот и результат👇🏻 P.S. конечно есть еще миллион промежуточных стадий, но на это сейчас закроем глаза и порадуемся!
👏4custom 51952947602475014984custom 51882453273453618583
Прокофьев соната для скрипки и фортепиано №1 Какая же красота! Как кадр и Курской косы, так и эта музыка которые у меня объединились и дополняют друг друга!!! Ссылки на ютуб в 4 частях Ютуб 1 (с 0.38) Ютуб 2 Ютуб 3 обязательно! Ютуб 4 Послуууууушайте!!! 😍 — очень красиво! 🔥 — знаю, она классная!
custom 51882453273453618583custom 51927580151235322892custom 51952947602475014982
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vera_classic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вера слушает” (@vera_classic), 141 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vera_classic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.