Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Veoveoveoveo

Channel

Veoveoveoveo

@veoveoveoveoveo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,229subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002017088432
TypeChannel
Username@veoveoveoveoveo
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/veoveoveoveoveo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,2296,3446,286.59 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,328 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,325 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,303 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,292 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,284 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,269 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,253 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,241 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,229 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,212–6,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:196,229-12
14 Sept 2026, 00:176,241-12
10 Sept 2026, 04:196,253-16
5 Sept 2026, 06:206,269-15
1 Sept 2026, 05:456,284-8
29 Aug 2026, 16:026,292-5
27 Aug 2026, 00:426,297-6
24 Aug 2026, 03:156,303-22
20 Aug 2026, 01:086,325+1
17 Aug 2026, 10:396,324-4
13 Aug 2026, 13:346,328-15
10 Aug 2026, 09:286,343-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:306,344no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:176,344first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,324 reactions across 22 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,38869.4%
🔥65210.3%
😭2924.62%
😁2844.49%
🤯2383.76%
👍1211.91%
🤔1211.91%
💊1021.61%
⚡610.965%
🎉310.49%
👎240.38%
🤬90.142%
😢10.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,324 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @veoveoveoveoveo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,370 views184 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Офигеть, кто-то сделал целый Веопинтрест с артами Можете оценить: https://odd-pine-b1af.convertor-photo.workers.dev

❤142🔥17🤯16👍4🎉2⚡1👎1💊1

11 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,400 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Короче внёс некоторые правки, ведь это самый сложный разбор за всё время вообще и тема которую изучать надо реально По этому выйдет завтра, но уже точно

🔥77❤24👍5🎉2😭1

11 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,710 views285 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

То самое чувство, когда хочется пошутить про вчерашние события, но у тебя не политический канал...

❤223🔥30😁15🤯6⚡4👍4😭3

10 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,020 views171 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за арт! Тгк автора: https://t.me/VLOG_KERON Кстати видео уже почти готово, думаю завтра выйдет уже

❤139🔥15👍14🎉3

7 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC≈3,710 views444 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ПЛЕЙЛИСТ С ДРОНАМИ ОБНОВИЛИ И ТЕПЕРЬ ТАМ НАПИСАНО "1 СЕЗОН" УРААА 4 СЕЗОН ДРОНОВ ВЫЙДЕТ 31 ФЕВРАЛЯ Бля мне страшно что будет с коментами под этим постом, ведь я упомянул 2 сезон... Ну а если серьёзно, то раньше у меня была позиция что его 100% не будет, а щас я думаю что какая-то вероятность есть, но любые обсуждения этого абсолютно бессмысленны, ведь если это и случится, то случился внезапно

❤334🤯61🔥24😁10👍5⚡3💊3👎2

7 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈3,030 views404 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ебать, вовремя я на ютуб зашёл Жаль обычная реклама мерча, я теперь зажрался и на каждую рекламу хочу спешл как с Джей было

❤327🔥38🎉16😭9🤯5💊3🤬3👍2

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈2,970 views142 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Ладно, это слишком просто. Давайте так, что бы вы выбрали, только отвечайте без шуток:

  1. Посмотреть 2 часа гача лайф сериалов в кино81%
  2. Посмотреть колобка 2026 в кино19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤105🔥20🤯14💊3

7 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈2,690 views302 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я оплатил 2 своим знакомым из РФ билеты на ебучего колобка 2026 и заставил их пойти туда что бы они посмотрели его Я попаду в ад из за этого? А если без шуток если вы не видели новости про него, то я искренне рад за вас

😭241❤35⚡12🔥5👍4🤬2😁2😢1

7 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC≈2,670 views174 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что бы вы выбрали?

  1. Вы переноситесь в июнь и можете пойти посмотреть уцц в кино, но с шансом 50% включится КОЛОБОК 202628%
  2. Отказаться (ебучий колобок это слишком страшно)72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁124❤23🤔12🤯6🔥5👍4

5 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,280 views414 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TADC bus station СНГ эдишн

❤305😁48😭16⚡14👍9💊9🔥7👎5

5 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈3,440 views337 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Прошёл ещё месяц и теперь остановка из финала выглядит так. Я представил реакцию местных жителей которые не шарят за уцц Ну а если серьёзно, то это очень круто как по мне, надеюсь смогу там побывать когда нибудь

❤268🔥31🤯24👍5⚡4💊4😁1

4 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈3,540 views329 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хочется сделать Дронстальгию на 5 летие пилота или 2 летие финала, но проблема в том что я дронов смотел с 4 серии и поэтому только начиная с неё у меня много воспоминаний Скипать период первых 3 серий не хочется, но и выдумывать воспоминания тоже. Как думаете что делать?

❤260🤔31🔥25👍11👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @veoveoveoveoveo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Poll1,190 voters approx.

Ладно, это слишком просто. Давайте так, что бы вы выбрали, только отвечайте без шуток:

  1. Посмотреть 2 часа гача лайф сериалов в кино81%
  2. Посмотреть колобка 2026 в кино19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll1,120 voters approx.

Что бы вы выбрали?

  1. Вы переноситесь в июнь и можете пойти посмотреть уцц в кино, но с шансом 50% включится КОЛОБОК 202628%
  2. Отказаться (ебучий колобок это слишком страшно)72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

Сколько из 9 признаков РАС у Эна ярко выражены? У обычного нейротипичного человека их 0-2. Ответ будет в видео, признаки брались с официального сайта здравоохранения Британии

  1. 05%
  2. 1-211%
  3. 3-426%
  4. 5-630%
  5. 7-812%
  6. 916%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GLITCH Россия
@glitchprod_ru · 26,333
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 12 September 2026
Бункер Князича
@knyaz1ch · 44,771
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
NDR Production
@TheGeekProduction · 29,435
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Veoveoveoveo” (@veoveoveoveoveo), 6,229 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veoveoveoveoveo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.