besok

Channel
𝒱𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘢𝘯.
@velveteean
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,557subscribers
+93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003721850803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @velveteean |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/velveteean |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 2,557 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 2,543 | +69 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 2,474 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 2,464 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.49%
- avg views ÷ 2,557 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 63.7
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,486 |
| Reactions total | 160 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411631854925156524 | 63 | 39.4% | |
| custom 5325729339319281627 | 34 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5202136686099725588 | 26 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5433826111312138892 | 26 | 16.3% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 6.25% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.625% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 7
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 39 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @velveteean. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
kapan 3juta
TIMAKACI KOKO PORICEANNN 🩷
Tepuk 3x 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Velveteean! Cantik imut! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Velveteean! cantik lucu lucu! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Velveteean! kompak tanpa batas! Dari awal sampai akhir, Kami tetap berdiri! Dari mimpi sampai prestasi, Kami terus berani! Karena kami... ✨ Cantik dalam sikap! ✨ Elegan dalam langkah! ✨ Kuat dalam semangat! ✨ Kompak dalam kebersamaan! VELVETEEAN! ♥️ Pretty! ♥️ Elegant! ♥️ Confident! VELVETEEAN! Shine bright! Stand tall! Be p…
ahn leean udah req
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (+88 CUE) Call. 📞 🎱 SHOTS / هدف ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
🕊1
😭😭😭😭
udah dihutan aja
ga ada
gak ada
info tempat penampungan buat roselisse
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @velveteean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,324 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@velvetdocs · 2017 postsHOVOID
@HOVOIDS · 1,6531 post#IanpaleSoIconic
@ianpale · 2,4821 post( HOLD SFS ) NINELYS: Ninth Of The Girlies.
@Ninelyss · 1,5891 postarsip @seokverse
@seokkverse · 51 postSeokverse.📗🗯
@Seokverse · 1,2241 postWishnity Arcive.
@Wishnityy · 61 postㅤㅤ YUSHOWL, Dust.
@Yushowls · 91 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bloomstash · 77 postsleftover ꫂ ၴႅၴ
@yueeanc · 136 postsTINKERIAN ✺ (REST & HOLD SFS)
@tinkerian · 1,4325 posts♡ 𝙲. 𝙻𝙾𝙴𝚅 ~ 𝒾an : *.゚𓎟ྀི
@cloevian · 4,7394 postsJiwooReve Chive.
@jiwoorevez · 154 posts(HOLD HFW & SFS). sirenic yuha ⋆˚࿔
@sirenyu · 1,6393 postsи. sn's reservoir
@slavasnoir · 63 postsAHNCRAFT.
@AHNCRAFT · 2,1192 postsdear girleeans
@girleeans · 152 postsLeeanotang!
@leemontangs · 162 postsLEONIÈRE's 🩶
@leonieree · 122 postsNords's chive
@Nordschive · 62 postsSahr of Jyu.
@SahrOfJyu · 8092 postsSEONDRUX'S ARCHIVE.
@SEONDRUXS · 312 posts𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘢𝘯'𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴. ♥️
@velvetdocs · 202 postsyuhamore 𝒇iles 𑁍
@yuhamores · 202 postsINVENTORY.
@Ahncrafts · 221 postcenterian’s archive!
@cherrycenter · 201 postCORTOWN’s Downstairs!
@cortowns · 181 postEOMIOUS: FERAL WEIRD.
@EOMIOUS · 2,2541 post₊ 𝒻loral–𝒾ans◟♡ ࣪ ׅ
@floralians · 4,5821 posthalcyian ✴︎
@halcyian · 1,7001 post[DISBAND] XOXO, KEEANS.
@KEEANS · 8291 postSEANEMOZ : Sean The Emo Zavior.
@SEANEMOZ · 2,3361 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@edainorace · 1,2041 postEOMFLARE.
@EOMFLARE · 3,9501 postHOVOID
@HOVOIDS · 1,6531 postDISBAND
@HYEORRAN · 2231 postHYUCKRUST: Built to Run
@hyuckrust · 1,7101 postKECYNIX ON REST.
@KECYNIX · 1,3061 post[HOLD SFS] 𝘖𝘝𝘝𝘚𝘐𝘙𝘌 : MEOVV DESIRE.
@OVVSIRE · 1,4631 postPETITAESAN OPEN GATEEE
@petitaesan · 1,2771 postRYUJΞAN̈S. 🎱
@RyuOnJeans · 2,5241 post𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘢𝘯'𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴. ♥️
@velvetdocs · 201 postWirehyul.
@Wirehyul · 1,9221 postThe Depth Of WONMARINE.
@wonmarine · 2,0341 postYuphony 🩷
@yuphony · 2,1031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒱𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘢𝘯.” (@velveteean), 2,557 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velveteean.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.