4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:12
211
+1
11 Aug 2026, 06:01
210
+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:03
209
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:32
209
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
210.1%
avg views ÷ 211 subscribers
Avg views / post
443
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
22 (30 April 2025 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
1,330
Reactions total
38
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 17 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.30% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5377660596349081900
12
9.30%
custom 5208689152631017596
11
8.53%
custom 5318926428950006006
8
6.20%
custom 5431508246311509838
8
6.20%
custom 5318829951099635230
7
5.43%
custom 5377329514500103570
7
5.43%
custom 5192916709870177519
6
4.65%
custom 5255958411639553177
6
4.65%
custom 5474505868286389154
6
4.65%
custom 5231178567760511591
5
3.88%
custom 5220074342133566087
4
3.10%
custom 5301129261296414563
4
3.10%
custom 5375170632008896799
4
3.10%
custom 5042202618076595764
3
2.33%
custom 5190804333284858119
3
2.33%
custom 5192814751641544207
3
2.33%
custom 5219950767334529887
3
2.33%
custom 5300989928262367021
3
2.33%
custom 5319041607087982461
3
2.33%
custom 5402455717426781538
3
2.33%
12 further kinds
20
15.5%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
70
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
69
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vellanceinfo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2025 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мои дорогие союзники и подписчики,
хочу сообщить, что наш флуд, проживший целых 5 лет, подходит к завершению. Я решила закрыть эту историю и начать всё заново — с чистого листа, новой атмосферой и совершенно другой тематикой.
Сейчас я открываю новый чат по теме «Селебрити». Если кто-то из вас хочет присоединиться к новой истории или занять роль — пишите мне в личные сообщения. Буду рада видеть вас там. 🖤
Все наши …
🤩 # 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐖𝐈𝐍
𝐒𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒
🔤𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬, 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐰𝐢𝐧 — 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮.
🔤ы открываем набор новых союзов для тех, кто хочет стать частью атмосферы darkwin.
🔤щем активные, эстетичные и дружелюбные союзы, готовые к красивому сотрудничеству и новым знакомствам.
🔤аш тёмный сомелье, который от
🕷️ # 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐁𝐈𝐑𝐓𝐇𝐃𝐀𝐘
🔤𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬, 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐰𝐢𝐧 — 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐞 𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐜.
🔤оброго времени, ценители тёмных винных оттенков.
🔤егодня мы хотим поделиться с вами прекрасной новостью — наш флуд darkwin празднует свой день рождения, и ему исполняется 5 лет.
🔤стория нашего чата началась с идеи отеля вина — места, где собирались…
🤩 # 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇
🔤𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬, 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 — 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐢𝐥 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬, 𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐲.
🔤оброго времени, ценители тёмных винных оттенков.
🔤окалы наполнены, а новые истории уже ждут своего начала. мы рады объявить о новом наборе участников в наш флуд и пригласить вас стать частью нашей уютной атмосферы.
🔤десь найдётся место для …
🔤орогие сеньоры и сеньориты мы решили летом сделать себе полное обновление всего и даже названия теперь с чата винтелс мы стали дарквин ( название мы придумали саме и проверили что вроде бы как оно не занято ) не теряйте!
🤩 # 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐖𝐈𝐍
𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐑𝐔𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆
🔤𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬, 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐰𝐢𝐧 — 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐢𝐥 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬, 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧.
🔤оржественно объявляем о новом наборе прекрасных леди и джентльменов. 👩
🔤нашем флуде мы будем рады видеть девушек и мужчин из самых разных фандомов, селебрити, а также персонажей, созданных лично вами. ❤️
🔤сли вы ищете приятную компанию, инте…
результаты ассоциации уже в нашем новостнике!
ссылочки для наших участников:
· 𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞
· 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐨𝐟𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞
· 𝐟𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬
· 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐝𝐬𝐟𝐚𝐦𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐
· 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐝𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐚𝐬
всех благодарим за участие!
🖤 # 𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐖𝐈𝐍
𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍
🔤𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧̃𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐬, 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐰𝐢𝐧 — 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡.
🔤честь своего недавнего открытия флуд винтелс решил провести ассоциацию для всех каналов и флудов.
𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞 :
«🔤аш канал/флуд как авто»
какая машина лучше всего отражает вайб вашего канала/флуда? чтобы узнать это, нужно сделать следующее:
1. подписаться …
𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍𝐘𝐌𝐎𝐔𝐒 𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍
Можно ли увидеть ваш лайф канал?
к сожалению, я не могу показать лайф-канал, так как у нас он считается более личной стороной флуда, особенно когда речь идёт об участниках. Там часто публикуют ролики и контент, рассчитанные только на определённую аудиторию, поэтому я стараюсь уважать приватность этого пространства, так как даже в тт видео выпускаются только с согласием участников.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @vellanceinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
good morning, ladies and gentlemen
сегодня — небольшой опрос
› анон 🌟17%
› ассоциацию 🌟36%
› придумать новую рубрику 🌟28%
› день открытых дверей 🌟55%
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 236,525 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vellanceinfo named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@amorianxw named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@rinelnxw named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@wintelsinfo named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@wintelsnews named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐕𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎” (@vellanceinfo), 211 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vellanceinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
