Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,873–2,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 23:01
1,986
+10
9 Sept 2026, 01:00
1,976
+10
3 Sept 2026, 09:33
1,966
+3
30 Aug 2026, 20:05
1,963
+12
27 Aug 2026, 20:11
1,951
+5
24 Aug 2026, 16:18
1,946
+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:14
1,941
+24
17 Aug 2026, 16:28
1,917
+12
14 Aug 2026, 09:49
1,905
+10
11 Aug 2026, 01:28
1,895
+5
7 Aug 2026, 23:37
1,890
+2
7 Aug 2026, 16:17
1,888
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
2m 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,165 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
275
23.6%
❤
165
14.2%
😁
154
13.2%
🤣
140
12.0%
🔥
108
9.27%
👏
101
8.67%
👌
95
8.15%
👎
30
2.58%
💯
28
2.40%
❤🔥
15
1.29%
🤯
13
1.12%
😐
7
0.601%
🖕
6
0.515%
😢
4
0.343%
😱
4
0.343%
☃
3
0.258%
🥰
3
0.258%
🫡
3
0.258%
💩
2
0.172%
🤔
2
0.172%
6 further kinds
7
0.601%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شاهدین علی انفسهم
شعر زیر از خامنهای رهبر هلاک شدهٔ فرقه ضاله ولایت فقیهیه نقل شده که گفته میشود در آن نحوه هلاکت خودش را هم پیش بینی کرده.
حالا نکته کجاست؟؟؟؟؟
حرف اول هر مصرع را از بالا به پایین کنار هم قرار بدهید:
«من علی خامنهای زاده شیطانم»
مستانه در این میکده بیتاب و قرارم
نستوهتر از سجده گذاران، سر دارم
عشاق پریشان دل سرمست بدانند
لبیک من از عمق سماوات بخوانند
یاران و رفیقان، همه در جنت اعلا
خوش منظره…
غرض اول
گزینه صحیح در نظر سنجی بالا آخرین گزینه است که متأسفانه درصد ناچیزی از شرکت کنندگان جواب درست دادند. متن فوق بریدههای کوتاهی از توصیف دروس و رویه های مدارس کلیسای واتیکان است که از مقدمه کتاب «سیف المسلمین فی قتال المشرکین» نوشته پدر آنتونیو دو ژزو، اسقف پرتغالی واتیکان، نقل شده است.
پدر آنتونیو در عصر صفویه از طرف پاپ به عنوان مبلغ مسیحیت به ایران اعزام شد. وی در ایران به مذهب حقّه شیعه گروید و نام خود را…
دارسات الحکمة
بخشهایی از یک کتاب را در زیر نقل قول میکنم، متعاقباً در نظر سنجی بعدی و مطلب بعد منبع این نقل قول و اغراض ما بعد آن را خواهم گفت:
کار ایشان همین است که هر روز از طلوع صبح به درسگاه میروند و مشغول درس و بحث میشوند تا سه ساعت به ظهر مانده و بعد از آن از درسگاه بیرون میآیند به قدر یک ساعت هر کدام در اطاق على حده که دارند مشغول مطالعه میگردند و اگر چنین نکنند پادری که پیر ایشان است ایشان را تنبیه می…
#پینوشت
یکی از اعضای کانال حوصلهاش از تکرار مطلب راجع به هلاکت بوزینه دوم از سلسله رهبران ولایت فقیه سر رفته.
آقا برای ما که سالهاست برای هلاکت این ملعون مشغول دعا بودیم بعد پنج ماه موضوع هنوز تازه است و هنوز هر لحظه شکر گذار خداوند قاصم الجبارین هستیم.
چهار ماه هم که اینترنت تعطیل بود و مطالب زیادی ناگفته ماند.
و الحمدلله رب العالمین
@velayatfaghih57
#جنایت_دی
#انتقام_الهی
🕋« قَدۡ مَكَرَ ٱلَّذِینَ مِن قَبۡلِهِمۡ فَأَتَى ٱللَّهُ بُنۡیَـٰنَهُم مِّنَ ٱلۡقَوَاعِدِ فَخَرَّ عَلَیۡهِمُ ٱلسَّقۡفُ مِن فَوۡقِهِمۡ وَأَتَىٰهُمُ ٱلۡعَذَابُ مِنۡ حَیۡثُ لَا یَشۡعُرُونَ »
🌐«بى گمان، كسانى كه پيش از اينان بودند [نيز] نيرنگ كردند از اين رو خدا بنيان آنان را از پايه هايشان بر كَنَد و سقف از فرازشان بر سر آنها فرو ريخت و عذاب از جايى كه گمان نمیکردند به آنان در رسيد»
سوره مبارکه ن…
شاهدین علی انفسهم بالکفر
علیرغم تمام تأکیدات أئمه علیهمالسلام به عدم امکان انتخاب امام و اصلح توسط مردم، این کور باطنهای ملعون همچنان در حال تئوری سازی و امام تراشی هستند.
نقدی کوتاه در پست قبلی ارائه شد (اینجا).
#مسیحیسانهای_فرقه_ضاله_ولایت_فقیهیه
#انتخاب_امام
@velayatfaghih57
کپی برابر اصل!
مسیحیان کاتولیک معتقدند که گرچه خداوند به انسانها اختیار در تصمیم داده اما قول هدایت به کلیسا داده و بنابراین کلیسا را به انتخاب درست پاپ هدایت میکند (مطالعه بیشتر در اینجا).
مسیحیان کاتولیک همچنین به عصمت پاپ معتقد هستند. در قرن سیزدهم میلادی، مجمع جهانی واتیکان، عصمت پاپ را به عنوان عقیده رسمی مسیحیان کاتولیک اعلام کرد.
این اعتقاد واتیکان بر دو بنیاد بنا شده است:
یکم: جملهای در اناجیل لوقا و متی …
#پست_موقت
اعلام وضعیت:
امروز وضعیت اینجوریه که مجتبی مُرده (یعنی همون روز با پدرش به لعنت حق پیوسته) و یک روز دار و دسته قالیباف از زبون مرده پیام میدهند مذاکره توافق؛ یک روز هم دار و دسته جلیلی و روسوفیل ها که جنگ جنگ، انتقام انتقام!
@velayatfaghih57
#نکته
🔹تعجبم از مردم بیدین ایران است که دیدند چگونه خداوند متعال از کسی که فرزندانشان را کشته بود انتقام کشید؛ به گونهای که پنجاه روز از جنایت دی ماه نگذشته، خودش و فرزندانش و سایر اهل بیتش و امرای سپاهیان جنایتکارش، همه را نابود کرد؛ باز هم به درگاه خداوند توبه نمیکنند و نماز شکر به جای نمیآورند.
🔹تعجبم از پیروان فرقه ضاله ولایت فقیهیه است که دیدند خداوند رهبر ملعونشان را که با ادعای بزرگ زمینهسازی ظهور (با …
👍77❤12👎10🔥7😁4😢3👌1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @velayatfaghih57. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وضعیت ولایت فرقه ضاله ولایت فقیهیه در حال حاضر مطابق کدام گزینه است ؟
مجتبی مرده است و بنابراین ولایت فقیه در حال حاضر تحت ولایت نیستند52%
مجتبی در غیبت است و این فرقه موقتا ولایت امام زمان (عج) را به عنوان نایب ولایت فقیه پذیرفته است6%
مجتبی غایب است ولی عقیده دارند ولایت فقیه در غیبت چون آفتاب پشت ابر نافع و بی نیاز از نایب است42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
امام مهدی عج @emammahdi · 32,391 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نگاهی به فرقه ضاله ولایت فقیه” (@velayatfaghih57), 1,986 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velayatfaghih57.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.