Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ‌ ‌𝖯𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗎𝗌 ‌ ‌‌ .ᐟ‌‌ ‌‌ ‌‌تـِم و پـك

@velanthor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

423subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003112867198
TypeChannel
Username@velanthor
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/velanthor

Growth

420423421.56 Aug 2026, 16:42 — 420 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 420 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:25 — 423 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:427 Aug 2026, 08:25
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:25423+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:31420no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:42420first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.77%
avg views ÷ 423 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total319
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Cdrama_moment

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌😶‍🌫️ 𝐋𝐢 𝐘𝐮𝐧𝐫𝐮𝐢 ‌ ‌ 𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐑𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ #Pack : 𝗍𝖺𝗉 𝗍𝖺𝗉 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌

6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Cdrama_momentSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Cdrama_moment

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 🪻 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐠 𝐙𝐢𝐲𝐢 ‌ 𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐑𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ #Pack : 𝗍𝖺𝗉 𝗍𝖺𝗉 ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌

6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Cdrama_momentSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC6 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wisfleu

ㅤㅤㅤ〰️𝗈𝗋𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾 . ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤩ㅤ𝖠𝗇𝖽 𝖨 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺 ㅤㅤ𝖬𝗈𝖽𝖻𝗈𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗒𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗌 🤩🤩 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤩 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗇 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖻𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍 : 𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗅 𝗂 𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾 , 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗄 𝖻𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖽 🤩

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

به عنوان یه کاراکتری که گاهی اوقات فان بود زیادی ابهت داشت واسم

6 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemesixsSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC21 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemesixs

‎ ˓ ﹫‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌𝚴emesis — #goyounjung ‌‌ ‌ ‌ xo ˓ ⏳ : can this love be translated ˒ ‎ ‌

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @velanthor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 125,121 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ‌ ‌𝖯𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗎𝗌 ‌ ‌‌ .ᐟ‌‌ ‌‌ ‌‌تـِم و پـك” (@velanthor), 423 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/velanthor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.