Channel
@veb_lab_club
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,151subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001838508076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @veb_lab_club |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/veb_lab_club |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 1,151 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 1,149 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 1,147 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 1,148 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (14 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,307 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
85 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 61.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 23.5% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Одна бессонная ночь не так безобидна, как кажется 🌚 Пока человек спит, в мозге активируется специальная очистительная система — глимфатическая. Она работает, как дворник: вымывает токсичные вещества, включая бета-амилоид, который связан с болезнью Альцгеймера. Что важно знать — в карточках ✅ Все посты превентивной рубрики можно найти по хэштегам #атласдолголетия и #мойврачговорит 📲
🔥6🙏2
Почему пациент продолжает жаловаться на усталость, если стандартные анализы в норме? 💜Стандартные анализы в норме, а пациент по-прежнему жалуется на усталость. Что искать дальше? Хроническая усталость, снижение концентрации внимания, мышечная слабость, плохая переносимость физической нагрузки — частые жалобы, которые не всегда удается объяснить результатами стандартных исследований. Одной из возможных причин может…
👍9
Доктор Белан. Медицина долголетия, диагностика и нутрицевтики pinned a photo
Когда ваш друг позовет вас поиграть в падел, очень важно сказать “да” ☝️ В выходные первый раз получилось поиграть в популярный ныне ракеточный вид спорта - падел. В связи с этим хотел поделиться своими впечатлениями. Сразу скажу, что в детстве я много лет занимался большим теннисом, поэтому сразу получилось поиграть в быстром темпе. Спустя 2 дня после первой игры, я все еще восстанавливаюсь 😀 Ну а что в отношен…
🔥12
🤩 Кататоническая депрессия? Или скрытый дефицит В12? Почему стандартные анализы обманывают врачей 🤩Женщина 23 лет жалуется на внезапную слабость и галлюцинации. Первичный осмотр проводит невролог. Визуализация мозга без серьезных отклонений. Все традиционные маркеры в норме, в том числе уровень цианокобаламина (витамина В12). Неврологическая патология снята. Пациентку направляют на стационарное психиатрическое лече…
🔥11❤4👍2👏1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4
🤩Пациент жалуется, а базовые анализы «в норме». Почему стандартная диагностика заводит в клинический тупик. 🧷 Ориентация исключительно на референсы рутинных панелей слепая зона. Орган еще не разрушен, но метаболизм уже сломан. Врач назначает симптоматическое лечение, не видя первичного биохимического триггера. 🤩 Практическая ценность углубленной лабораторной диагностики: 🤩Органические кислоты. Показывают сбои клет…
👍7🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5
30% взрослых и 60% подростков спят недостаточно ⚠️ Кирилл Белан, руководитель направления превентивной медицины, врач-терапевт, специалист превентивной медицины клиник «Атлас», рассказывает: • Чем опасен сон менее 7 часов • Сколько нужно спать взрослым • Какие циклы сна важны В видео — ответы на эти и другие вопросы ✅
🔥6🙏5👍2🤝1
Растет анти-ТПО? А гормонозаместительная терапия не останавливает деструкцию? Почему стандартный протокол при АИТ работает лишь наполовину. 🧷 Пациент с аутоиммунным тиреоидитом или болезнью Грейвса получает гормональную терапию. Лабораторно уровень ТТГ и тиреоидных гормонов скомпенсирован. Проблема решена? В большинстве случаев нет. Это одна из самых опасных диагностических ловушек. Изолированный контроль гормональ…
🔥5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @veb_lab_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 88,720 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор Белан. Медицина долголетия, диагностика и нутрицевтики” (@veb_lab_club), 1,151 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veb_lab_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.