Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ВЭБ Центр 🌐 Пространство развития

@veb_center

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,565subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002064897284
TypeChannel
Username@veb_center
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/veb_center

Growth

1,5641,5651,564.57 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,564–1,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:271,565+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:191,564no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:491,564first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.6%
avg views ÷ 1,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
370
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held7 (25 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total1,110
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5343.8%
🔥2419.8%
👏2016.5%
custom 52043608735686561261512.4%
😍43.31%
👍32.48%
🆒10.826%
😱10.826%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC282 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @coffeemaniaruPhoto

Новая эра grab-and-go: ребрендинг Bez Tarelok на Новинском бульваре Из внутреннего проекта «Кофемании» Bez Tarelok выросли в независимую историю со своим характером, командой и особым отношением к времени гостя. Бренд становится ресторанным форматом grab-and-go с собственным лицом. Bez Tarelok не заставляет выбирать между временем и заботой о себе. Бренд даёт и то, и другое.

22 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC419 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лето — идеальное время для прохладных напитков Собрали небольшой гид по сезонным фаворитам в кофейнях и кафе ВЭБ Центра — по рекомендациям бариста. 🤩 Русская чайная «НИТКА» Попробуйте лимонад «Черная смородина» на основе фирменного чая «Министерский». Освежающий вкус с легкими ягодными нотами — отличный выбор для жаркого дня. 🥗 АЗБУКА DAILY Бариста рекомендуют Бамбл — освежающее сочетание эспрессо и апельсинового

3custom 52043608735686561263

20 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC409 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чайная переговорная нового формата В новой русской чайной «Нитка» на 1 этаже ВЭБ Центра есть отдельная чайная комната — пространство для деловых встреч, переговоров, лекций, кинопоказов и камерных событий. Забронировать чайную комнату 💎🔮🕳 «Мы хотели создать альтернативу привычным переговорным комнатам. Здесь есть всё необходимое для презентаций и встреч, удобное расположение в ВЭБ Центре, хороший чай и красивая по

9👏7custom 52043608735686561263😱1

7 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC937 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Концертный сезон ВЭБ Центра завершился 26 июня вечером «Время русской музыки» ⏳ Ансамбль солистов Pelle d’Oca под управлением Николая Шугаева исполнил классические и современные отечественные сочинения. Программу вечера объединила тема времени и вечности. Открыл вечер концерт для органа и камерного оркестра «Хронос» петербургского композитора Антона Танонова. Солировала Евгения Кривицкая: впервые орган выступил вме

16🔥13👏5😍4

1 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC638 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐟 «Рыба Моя» × ВЭБ Центр: сезон вкуса Если давно искали повод выбраться на обед, отдохнуть на веранде или устроить красивый ужин после работы, он появился прямо в ВЭБ Центре. Ресторан «Рыба Моя» представил сезонное меню, которое доступно только в 🟪🟦🟩: 🐚тако романо с крабом и гуакамоле; 🐚тартар из тунца Бигай с черешней и муссом из авокадо; 🐚осидзуси с тунцом и лососем; 🐚салат с тигровыми креветками, страчателлой и

7👍3custom 52043608735686561262🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC827 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В ВЭБ Центре состоялось закрытие концертного сезона! Тема времени и вечности на заключительном концерте в честь Дня России звучала в исполнении Ансамбля Pelle d’Oca под управлением Николая Шугаева. Громкие аплодисменты и овации — делимся с Вами атмосферой вечера!

12🔥10custom 52043608735686561265🆒1

25 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC869 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

23 июня в атриуме ВЭБ Центра прошел первый пресс-завтрак, на котором собрались ведущие журналисты в сфере искусства и культуры. Получить концентрат всего, сделанного ВЭБ Центром за первый концертный сезон, увидеть на большом экране кадры с прошедших концертов, обсудить стратегию развития и новую подачу классической музыки за кофе — вот краткое содержание утра, зарядившего нас энергией на год вперед. Более подробно м

👏86custom 52043608735686561262

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @veb_center. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 755,150 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВЭБ Центр 🌐 Пространство развития” (@veb_center), 1,565 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/veb_center.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.