不夜城娱乐已经跑路 兄弟们赶紧撤
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵

Channel
@vcsss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,491subscribers
+873 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003792780783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vcsss |
| Description | 广告商务对接:@azeee 星推矩阵大群: @pxxxxxx 阿泽财富命运共同体:打破“零和博弈、独赢独占”,以共建、共营、共享、共担为原则,让财富创造更普惠、分配更均衡、风险更共扛。 实力广告招商来袭,实力护航合作共赢,深耕流量赛道,实力吊打同行,每日固定直播PG加持,全程保充值、保有效新增,诚意邀各大平台携手掘金! 以数据为基,以创意为翼,星推矩阵,重构传播新生态。 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vcsss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 14,491 | -46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 14,537 | -56 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 14,593 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 14,583 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 14,609 | +218 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 14,391 | +160 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 14,231 | +613 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 13,618 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70,627 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vcsss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
不夜城娱乐已经跑路 兄弟们赶紧撤
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
100元送188 200元送388 500元送888 3倍流水最高提现5000元 只有3个名额 私信我来领取 @azeee
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 【场馆我们选,责任我们扛|这才是U8的底气】 😀 近日某场馆“漏洞事件”闹得沸沸扬扬。 😀 有些平台平时欢迎会员来玩,一到会员赢大了,就开始搬出“套利”“内部勾结”“场馆漏洞”等理由,拖审核、卡出款、把责任全甩给玩家。 😀 会员赢几百万就开始找借口,问题真在场馆吗?说到底,不是场馆有漏洞,是平台实力有漏洞! 😀 U8的态度只有一句:敢让会员玩,就要敢给会员出。场馆是U8精选的,责任就由U8承担。只要会员正常投注、凭本事赢,该出的,一分不少! 😀 牛逼不是吹的,实力也不是喊的。平台敢收,更要敢付;会员赢了以后痛快兑现,才是真正的行业底气! 😀 来U8,你尽管赢,出款交给我们! 😀 官方信息入口: 😀😀😀😀😀: @U8com_cn 😀😀😀😀😀: u8alz.com 😀😀😀😀😀: @U8U8 /@U8YL /@U8GJ 😀 官方接待 :@bzyyyy 😀 邀请码 : 392…
❤2
Signed U8国际五五(首存存多少送多少)招代理
平台搞的活动真牛逼 388元彩金 3个名额 私信我来领取 @azeee
❤1
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
188元彩金名额已经发完 继续发5个288元的彩金名额 需要的联系我即可 @azeee
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
3个特邀名额 想要的来联系我 白嫖勿扰 @azeee
👎1
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
进来吹吹牛逼 https://t.me/pxxxxxx?videochat
👎1
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
别他妈的叫了 赶紧注册88国际注册了评论区发平台账号 我发现金红包 注册链接 88guoji.com
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
❤️❤️❤️❤️ ⚽️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️⚽️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 大额无忧 亿万秒下 视信誉如命 玩的开心 提的开心 👑 新用户首次充值,即可领取专属彩金👑 🤣首存🤣 🤣🥹🥹 ➜ 赠送 😆🥹 🎉 😂🥹🥹 ➜ 赠送 😁🥹 🎉 🥹🥹🥹➜ 赠送 🥹🥹 🎉 🤣🥹🥹🥹➜ 赠送 🥹😁🥹🎉 😂🥹🥹🥹➜ 赠送 😆🥹🥹🎉 🤣🥹🥹🥹🥹 ➜ 赠送 😁🥹🥹🎉 🌭 活动规则 同一 IP 地址仅限领取一次 首次充值即可参与 注 仅限3倍流水 不限任何玩法 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️ 代理招募 全网直招代理 无需复杂话术,轻松推广 欢迎长期合作,共创收益 官方网址: 88guoji.com 😂88娱乐财务:@q88q88 🤣 官方频道:@bcc88guoji [频道里面不定时抽奖] ❤️官方管理:@guoji88gl ❤️官方…
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
2个特邀名额人民币台子 审核提供其他平台流水记录地址即可 联系我审核 @pxxxxxx
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
今晚9点直播 直播期间福利不断 认准 @pxxxxxx
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
不夜城娱乐 https://byc88.vip/ 前10个注册好送8.88彩金 账号发在评论区
Signed 阿泽·赌圈星推矩阵
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @vcsss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@vcsss edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
投票星推矩阵彩金
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 299,615 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“赌圈星推矩阵 • 福利频道” (@vcsss), 14,491 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vcsss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.