5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,572–2,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 06:18
2,573
-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:51
2,576
-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:00
2,579
-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:30
2,580
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:20
2,580
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 2,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
333
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
10 (20 February 2026 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
333
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
39
62.9%
❤
6
9.68%
🔥
5
8.06%
💊
4
6.45%
🤯
3
4.84%
😴
2
3.23%
🤷♂
2
3.23%
😁
1
1.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧐 Как дела: АвтоВАЗ
Крупнейший производитель легковых автомобилей в России 20 июля отпраздновал 60-летие. История предприятия начинается с постановления правительства о постройке завода в Тольятти. АвтоВАЗ встречает юбилей лидером российского рынка легковушек, хотя удерживаться на первой позиции стало сложнее, чем десятилетия назад. Так, по итогам первой половины 2026 года марка Lada занимает 25% рынка легковушек в …
📚АвтоВАЗ уже в июле 2026 года начнет внедрять T-Flex на 100 АРМ
21 мая. / На Автотрассе /. Сегодняшний уровень «цифры» на площадках «АвтоВАЗа» уже можно измерять не лозунгами, а железом: в цехах задействованы 1 599 роботов, а по территории курсируют 721 единица автономного напольного транспорта. На сварочном участке Lada Granta автоматизация, по оценке предприятия, перевалила за 86%, и это наглядно показывает, куда …
АВТОВАЗ обновляет производство алюминиевого литья
23 марта. / Новости Ростеха /. На АВТОВАЗе реализуется масштабная программа технологического переоснащения производства алюминиевого литья и кузнечных поковок. Это даст возможность повышать производительность, поддерживать стабильное качество серийных деталей, а кроме того, реализовать ряд перспективных проектов.
Решение о замене парка оборудования было принято три…
📚АвтоВАЗ рассказал про многоступенчатую защиту кузовов машин Lada от коррозии
11 марта. / Автоновости дня /. «АвтоВАЗ» рассказал, как формируется антикоррозийная защита кузова автомобилей LADA. Как уточнили в компании, покрытие включает несколько этапов обработки металла и окраски — от применения оцинкованной стали до нанесения грунта, эмали и лака.
Основой антикоррозийной защиты кузовов машин LADA служит широкое и…
Lada-2107 ("Семерка") стала самой массовой моделью в России - в стране больше миллиона таких машин.
В целом Lada стала и самой массовой маркой - на начало года количество автомобилей бренда достигло 12,17 миллиона штук, подсчитал "Автостат".
На втором месте Toyota (4,5 миллиона), следом идут корейские Kia и Hyundai (2,75 и 2,7 миллиона соответственно).
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
БЕСПЛАТНАЯ ЗАПРАВКА НА 30 ЛИТРОВ!
Хочешь получить 30 литров бенза бесплатно или 2000₽ на карту?
Тогда читай внимательно!
От тебя нужно:
1 . Написать в лс @Artommy1 «30 литров», свое имя и возраст
2 . Выполнить несколько простых заданий
3 . Получить деньги на заправку
4. Рассказать друзьям, чтобы не пропустили
Актуальна до 28 февраля включительно!
Строго 22 места!
Посчитаешь нужным потратить на что-то другое - бе…
"Можно, а зачем?"
Такой товарный знак хочет зарегистрировать "АвтоВАЗ".
Это фраза руководителя проектов новых автомобилей Олега Груненкова, которая стала мемом - так он ответил на вопрос, может ли компания производить автомобили, аналогичные BMW.
Под брендом "Можно, а зачем?" в России хотят продавать автомобили, одежду, обувь, игрушки и даже пиво.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
🚨СКИДКА 1000 рублей по промокоду VESTA1000
На органайзеры в багажник для Лады Веста.
✍🏻Действует до 28 февраля
Переходите по ссылке и забирайте органайзер для Весты по суперцене https://www.ozon.ru/product/sumka-v-bagazhnik-lada-vesta-sedan-komplekt-2-sht-pravaya-i-levaya-3012288780/
👍6❤2🔥1😴1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @vazavto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vazavto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клуб любителей Lada АВТОВАЗ” (@vazavto), 2,573 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vazavto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
