🎙خبرنگار: خب مگه نمیگی به احتمال زیاد دیگه قرار نیست به ایران حمله کنی، پس قضیه اون ناو تئودور روزولت (USS Theodore Roosevelt – CVN-71) چیه باز داره میره اونجا؟ 🇺🇸 ترامپ: اونو محض احتیاط میفرستم! 💢این ناو در حال حرکت به سمت خاورمیانهست و داره به منطقه میرسه. بنابراین الان اونجا سه تا ناو هواپیمابر داریم. 💢همهشون کاملاً مسلح و آماده عملیات هستن و امیدوارم مجبور نشیم ازشون استفاده کنیم. 🔖 ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید…

Channel
Vatanam_khabar | اخبار ایران
@vatanam_khabar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,500subscribers
-3,116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003517874500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vatanam_khabar |
| Description | 📢 اخبار ایران و جهان ⚡ پوشش سریع رویدادهای مهم 🧭 بدون حاشیه؛ فقط اخبار مهمی که باید بدانید! 📍 پیوستن به پایگاه رسمی: @Vatanam_khabar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vatanam_khabar |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:36 | 7,500 | -53 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 7,553 | -52 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:19 | 7,605 | -36 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 7,641 | -51 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 7,692 | -56 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 7,748 | -76 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 7,824 | -65 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 7,889 | -54 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 7,943 | -63 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 8,006 | -140 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 8,146 | -213 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 8,359 | -300 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 8,659 | -126 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 8,785 | -166 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 8,951 | -164 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:09 | 9,115 | -129 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 9,244 | -128 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 9,372 | -122 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 9,494 | -202 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 9,696 | first reading |
Engagement
918 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.581%
- avg views ÷ 7,500 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 43.6
- 273 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.64%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 273
- of 918 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 273 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 918 (7 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,904 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 02:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈27,100
- Videos
- ≈20,000
- Links
- ≈209
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 12m
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 268 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 97 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 21.2% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 8.76% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 8.76% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| 🖕 | 10 | 7.30% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 6.57% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 2.92% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 1.46% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 2.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 918 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 918 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 273 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸🇮🇷در سال 2025، پیش از جنگ 12 روزه، آکسیوس از مثبت بودن مذاکرات سخن گفت و 17 روز بعد، جنگ آغاز شد. در سال 2026، بار دیگر از مثبت بودن مذاکرات سخن گفت و دو روز بعد، جنگ آغاز شد. امروز، آکسیوس بار دیگر بازگشته و تأکید میکند که مذاکرات دوباره مثبت است. 🔖 ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #آینده_ایران #نقطه_عطف #پشت_پرده_سیاسی #خبر_تحلیلی #تحلیل_روز
🇺🇸ترامپ: هگست چه کارهایی انجام داده است؟ او جنگ را برد. او مسئولیت داشت. او جنگ را در ونزوئلا برد. 🇮🇷و به نظر من، او قطعاً جنگ را در ایران نیز برده است. 🔖 ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #معادلات_قدرت #روایت_میدان #قبل_از_وقوع #تحولات_منطقه #هشدار_امنیتی
خبرنگار سی ان ان: اگر پیت هگست استیضاح شود، از او حمایت میکنی؟ ترامپ: بله، از او حمایت میکنم. او دو جنگ را برد. توماس مسی یک بازنده است. درست مثل تو که در CNN بازندهای. ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #نقطه_عطف #گزارش_ویژه #پشت_پرده_سیاسی #تحولات_منطقه #هشدار_امنیتی
در سال 2025، پیش از جنگ 12 روزه، آکسیوس از مثبت بودن مذاکرات سخن گفت و 17 روز بعد، جنگ آغاز شد. در سال 2026، بار دیگر از مثبت بودن مذاکرات سخن گفت و دو روز بعد، جنگ آغاز شد. امروز، آکسیوس بار دیگر بازگشته و تأکید میکند که مذاکرات دوباره مثبت است.. ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #پشت_پرده_سیاسی #نبض_خاورمیانه #موازنه_قوا #گسل_سیاسی #اتاق_فکر
✅ رادار جزیره قشم امشب: ✅ | Teor ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #معادلات_قدرت #خبر_تحلیلی #برآورد_امنیتی #نبض_خاورمیانه #پشت_پرده_سیاسی
نفت برنت در محدوده ۹۰ دلار است ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #معادلات_قدرت #تحولات_منطقه #گسل_سیاسی #روایت_میدان #سناریو_سیاسی
🇺🇸🇮🇷اظهارات دیگر ترامپ درباره ایران: 💢ما متحدان بسیار خوبی در آنجا داریم و باید مطمئن شویم که به آنها آسیبی نرسد، و در غیر این صورت آسیب خواهند دید. 💢در حال حاضر، آنها بسیار امنتر از شش ماه پیش هستند، زیرا ایران تا حد زیادی تضعیف شده است، اما آنها هنوز هم تا حدودی نقش یک زورگو را در خاورمیانه ایفا میکنند. 💢ما میخواهیم مطمئن شویم که آنها در وضعیت خوبی قرار دارند. 💢ما میخواهیم از افرادی که سالها به ما بسیار کمک کر…
🇺🇸🇮🇷ترامپ: حداقل ۷۵هزار نفر از معترضان کشته شدهاند. ایران مکانی ناخوشایند است! 🔖 ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #گسل_سیاسی #آینده_ایران #خبر_تحلیلی #نبض_خاورمیانه #نقطه_عطف
ترامپ درباره حضور ناوهای هواپیمابر آمریکا در خاورمیانه: «ما برای احتیاط، یک ناو هواپیمابر دیگر هم اعزام کردیم. ناوهای زیادی داریم. این ناو در حال حرکت بهسوی خاورمیانه است و بهزودی به منطقه میرسد؛ بنابراین اکنون سه ناو هواپیمابر در اختیار داریم. همه آنها در آمادهباش کامل و آماده عملیات هستند و امیدواریم مجبور به استفاده از آنها نشویم. ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبا…
ترامپ: «پس چه کسی قرار است افرادی را که جنگ ویتنام را اداره کردند، استیضاح کند؟» ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #اتاق_فکر #موازنه_قوا #روایت_میدان #نقطه_عطف #گزارش_ویژه
ترامپ درباره عملکرد پیت هگست: «هگست چه کاری انجام داده است؟ او جنگ را پیروز شد. مسئولیت آن را بر عهده داشت. او جنگ ونزوئلا را پیروز شد. و قطعاً به نظر من، جنگ با ایران را هم پیروز شده است.» ☑️ بلومبرگ فارسی✔️ ✍🏻 PASHA به ما بپیوندید: @Vatanam_khabar #اخبارـجنگ #اخبارـایران #هشدار_امنیتی #آینده_ایران #گسل_سیاسی #اتاق_فکر #تصمیم_بزرگ
Showing the 12 most recent of 918 posts we hold for @vatanam_khabar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vatanam_khabar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vatanam_khabar | اخبار ایران” (@vatanam_khabar), 7,500 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vatanam_khabar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.