Channel
@vasilyevtraining
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,768subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001797157091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vasilyevtraining |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vasilyevtraining |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 1,768 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 1,769 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 1,771 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,771 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,797 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
134 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 41.0% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 23.1% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vasilyevtraining. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Поделюсь-как я с вами сокровенными моментами из практики. Ну что ж, за 10 мин до начала я начала нервничать, мне стало жарко, вспотели ладошки , «выскакивало» сердце. Но начала норм, разгонялась конечно, но мысль не теряла, и говорила громко и устойчиво , как мне показалось. — сообщает мне ученица, руководитель в компании Х. К. презентует! Все пока неплохо))) — пишет ее руководительница. Эти два сообщения подсве…
❤7
Какая тема оказалась для вас наиболее интересной и актуальной из недавних постов? Можете отметить несколько вариантов.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вчера мы выяснили, что репетировать лучше об живого человека. Без возвращения в естественную среду - диалог - мысль буксует. “Но партнер для тренировки есть не всегда” - скажете вы, -” а как же подготовиться, если ты один?” Развивать мысль в одиночестве можно, но, коллеги, это не должен быть монолог. Обратимся снова к Выготскому, который сделал некоторые свои открытия, наблюдая за детьми. Собирая сложный конструк…
❤7🔥3
Какой самый доступный и эффективный инструмент подготовки к выступлению? Мы ищем все время волшебные таблетки для уверенности, а про самую доступную забываем. Как чаще всего выглядит подготовка - человек просто прокручивает слова в голове. И это худший вариант, потому что мысль остается в виде невнятного облака. Кто-то репетирует вслух в пустой комнате. Это уже неплохо – когда мысль пересказывается своими словами…
❤6
Продолжаем нашу тему “Возлюби самого себя”. Уверенность в себе во время публичных выступлений — ценный ресурс, однако его использование требует жесткой самодисциплины. С уменьшением масштаба аудитории чрезмерная яркость спикера может стать препятствием для достижения бизнес-целей. Одна из таких ситуация: внутреннее совещание, например – совет директоров. Харизматичный лидер, обладающий навыками ораторского искусст…
🔥4👍3
Коллеги, мы все еще говорим про пристройки. Давайте начнем с базовой истины, о которой люди часто забывают, но она сильно облегчает жизнь вообще и профессиональную в частности. Нравиться себе - это абсолютно нормально и даже хорошо. Если вы базово нравитесь себе «по жизни», вам в разы легче держать ту самую пристройку «на равных» в любых сложных коммуникациях. Почему? Потому что вы не идете к людям выпрашивать одоб…
👍9❤1
Актери и режиссер Михаил Чехов использовал психотехнику "излучение". В чем ее суть для повседневной жизни и коммуникации?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вчера я дал вам техники по выходу из пристройки «снизу». И тут возникает соблазн. А может, ну его, это равенство? Может, надо сразу бить «сверху», чтобы стать самым сильным в комнате и точно не проиграть? Отвечаю в аудио. Спойлер: пристройка сверху - это далеко не всегда добро. Не перепутайте борьбу эго с реальным сотрудничеством
❤4👍3
Коллеги, продолжаем разговор о пристройках. И сейчас будет практика! Посты с теорией читайте тут и тут. 1️⃣Пётр Ершов (Школа русского психологического театра) Именно Ершов ввел и детально разобрал термин «пристройка». По его мнению, пристройка — это не просто эмоция, это физическое действие, направленное на партнера. Смена внутреннего глагола (задачи): Пристройка снизу возникает, когда человек бессознательно решает…
❤9👍6🔥5🙏1
В продолжение нашего разговора о пристройках. Мы с вами уже выяснили, как на важных встречах умные, взрослые люди бессознательно проваливаются в позицию «снизу» — то есть отдают власть и статус аудитории еще до того, как открыли рот. Но вот вы начали говорить. И что происходит дальше? А дальше это “пристраивание себя снизу” начинает фонить в поле речи. Даже если вы детально продумали мысли и подготовили аргументы, …
🔥9❤3
Как получить "допинг" перед важной встречей с помощью гимнастики Стрельниковой?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Васильев учит говорить pinned «Тело и психофизика: как настроить свой инструмент Собрал для вас вторую часть базы. Первая часть - список упражнений, как перестать волноваться перед выступлением тут. Наш главный инструмент — это тело, и если оно зажато, а голос не звучит, даже самые умные…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vasilyevtraining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая тема оказалась для вас наиболее интересной и актуальной из недавних постов? Можете отметить несколько вариантов.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Актери и режиссер Михаил Чехов использовал психотехнику "излучение". В чем ее суть для повседневной жизни и коммуникации?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как получить "допинг" перед важной встречей с помощью гимнастики Стрельниковой?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Васильев учит говорить” (@vasilyevtraining), 1,768 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasilyevtraining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.