Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мальчик который выжил

Channel

Мальчик который выжил

@vasilevYT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

17,822subscribers

-196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668432683
TypeChannel
Username@vasilevYT
DescriptionНовый взгляд на жизнь, путешествия и социальную привлекательность! По консультации, рекламе и как поехать вместе писать: @SirElSergio Автор: Сергей Васильев
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vasilevYT

Growth

17,82218,01817,9207 August 2026 — 18,018 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,018 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,015 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,012 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,004 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,992 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,988 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,980 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,964 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,952 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,949 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,943 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,938 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,934 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,932 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,915 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,887 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,850 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,828 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,822 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 20 days, net -196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,793–18,047 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 22:4517,822-6
25 Aug 2026, 22:3417,828-22
24 Aug 2026, 23:3417,850-37
23 Aug 2026, 07:3517,887-28
21 Aug 2026, 19:5817,915-17
20 Aug 2026, 13:5817,932-2
19 Aug 2026, 17:0217,934-4
18 Aug 2026, 19:3917,938-5
17 Aug 2026, 18:5317,943-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:1817,949-3
15 Aug 2026, 10:2417,952-12
14 Aug 2026, 02:0717,964-16
12 Aug 2026, 18:3817,980-8
11 Aug 2026, 16:5217,988-4
10 Aug 2026, 19:1517,992-12
9 Aug 2026, 16:0218,004-8
8 Aug 2026, 15:1918,012-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:1618,015-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:3018,018no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2518,018first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 17,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,920
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held26 (23 June 202626 August 2026)
Views total40,844
Reactions total618
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
433
Videos
79
Links
74

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,317 reactions across 26 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥63748.4%
👍15611.8%
😁1299.79%
977.37%
🤣977.37%
🕊715.39%
🙏191.44%
🥴171.29%
🏆141.06%
💯110.835%
😢110.835%
100.759%
😱80.607%
🤔80.607%
❤‍🔥50.38%
🌭40.304%
🍾40.304%
🤯40.304%
🍌30.228%
🐳30.228%
5 further kinds90.683%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 26 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vasilevYT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC644 views20 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Я перепробовал все способы заработка на YouTube. И вот что я могу сказать Всё решает то, о чём ты снимаешь, кто тебя смотрит, что у тебя есть за спиной кроме канала и на каком этапе ты находишься прямо сейчас За последнее время я разобрал десятки чужих каналов - разные ниши, разные стадии. И картина такая: человек упирается в способ заработка, который ему не подходит, и решает, что на ютубе денег нет Отсюда мой гл

🔥9👍4🍌3🏆21🥴1

25 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,480 views32 reactions1 Starread 26 August 2026
Photo

Шортс с 13 млн просмотров принёс $5 Пять. Долларов Большинство уверено: деньги на ютубе - это когда тебе платят за просмотры. На самом деле это самая непостоянная и задроченная часть дохода из всех. 13 миллионов просмотров - пять долларов, привет Реальная экономика ютуба устроена иначе. Я 7 лет собирал её по кусочкам, и в моей карте - 13 с лишним разных способов зарабатывать По каждому я знаю, как он работает, ск

🔥253🏆3💯1

24 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,670 views25 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Ютуб - это не профессия. Это инструмент. Многие думают, что ютуб это для блогеров. Надо быть медийным, снимать себя, стать звездой. Из-за этой ошибки люди не начинают вести свой канал годами Ютуб - просто инструмент. Лопата. Лопатой можно посадить дерево, а можно ударить соседа по голове. Так и тут: можно привести трафик (людей) в своё дело и показать свой продукт. И тогда все твои зрители - твои потенциальные кл

👍15🔥73

24 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,690 views33 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Так куда же я отправился в путешествие? Спасибо всем кто отгадывал Это долгожданнейшая поездка и место из топа моих «сюда я точно не смогу поехать». Чтобы было интереснее сначала напишу топ, и потом уже место, если не понятно из видео) Рио, Коста-Рика, Амазонка, Кейптаун, Мачу пикчу, Австралия, Камчатка. Я в шоке, да, я на Камчатке. С самого начала путешествий я афигел от стоимости путешествия по региону, тот фак

🔥254🤔2🥰2

24 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,610 views18 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥17🏆1

23 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,870 views33 reactions1 Starread 26 August 2026
Photo

Ютуб самый быстрый социальный и финансовый лифт из всех, что я знаю Сейчас внимание - это главный ресурс Кто умеет его генерировать, может все: продавать, заводить выгодные связи, получать выходы на людей, на которых и за деньги не выйти Ютуб раздаёт это внимание бесплатно Бизнесы платят в среднем 1000 рублей за целевого клиента, а ты получаешь просмотры просто за то, что выложил видео И это на рынке, который смо

🔥23🤣62💯2

22 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈2,190 views81 reactions10 Starsread 26 August 2026

Почему ни один гуру не покажет тебе свои результаты Меня давно бомбит с рынка обучения ютубу. Там есть удобная отмазка: тренеры не играют. Мол, тот, кто учит, вовсе не обязан сам иметь цифры. По-честному это инфоциганщина. Особенно весело с американским ютубом. Человек рисует себе цифры, рассказывает, как там миллионы просмотров набираются чуть ли не одним касанием мизинца левой ноги, - а показать канал отказывает

🔥725🏆3😁1

21 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈2,420 views177 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Вы давно спрашиваете меня "Откуда деньги, Лебовски?" и я понял что я наконец готов поделиться. Не деньгами, а историей) 7 лет назад ютуб заплатил мне мои первые 70$ К ним за то же лето накапали донаты - 20 тысяч рублей Я тогда вообще не понимал, откуда на ютубе берутся деньги. Снимал, потому что нравилось и хотелось перемен. Дальше было так: стримы по $100 за полтора часа лучший месяц - $25 000 сегодня - 3-6$

🔥166💯7🏆3😁1

21 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,490 views16 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Завтра лечу в новый трип, кто угадает первым куда отправлю сувенир оттуда)

🔥151

9 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈4,280 views11 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Ребят, кто заполнял анкету по ютубу, которую я дропал? 👋 Мы идём на второй круг. Придумали кое-что новое по продукту Кто со мной уже созванивался - откликнетесь. А кто ещё не отзывался - будьте готовы, напишу вам Кто хочет поучаствовать впервые - пишите сюда @sergioYTT 🤝

7🏆21💯1

1 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈5,880 views35 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Совершенно случайно оказался на пивном фестивале в Китае в городе Циндао. Целый месяц тут происходит дичайший движ. Жара +30 даже ночью и куча китайцев которые вступают в борьбу с алкогольными запасами Китая. А еще Циндао это пивная столица Китая и в отличии от других городов Китая тут хорошее пиво 🍻

🔥257👍3

31 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC≈4,880 views26 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2222

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @vasilevYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vasilevYT edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 419,717 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мальчик который выжил” (@vasilevYT), 17,822 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasilevYT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.