Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Варежка о кино

@vareshkaokino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480868013
TypeChannel
Username@vareshkaokino
DescriptionПишу рецензии,просвещаю себя и вас в сфере кино Вопросы и предложения @varessshka
Created15 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vareshkaokino

Growth

1207 Aug 2026, 20:02 — 120 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 120 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:029 Aug 2026, 04:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:16120no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:02120first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,050
Videos
100
Links
418

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 09s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4938.9%
4233.3%
😭1612.7%
❤‍🔥97.14%
😢32.38%
🍾21.59%
👍21.59%
🤔21.59%
👎10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 17 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2025, 22:38 UTC864 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Бустер анонсировал стрим с актерами фильма «Анора» — Юрой Борисовым и Марком Эйдельштейном Ждем? @slivnayakrysask

🔥5

16 Mar 2025, 20:19 UTCviews —

Варежка о кино pinned «Пока еще Юру Борисова обсуждают на западе а девочки делают тиктоки с Марком Эйдельштейном, написала тут небольшую рецензию на самый достойный просмотра фильм на 2025 год»

16 Mar 2025, 20:16 UTC885 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пока еще Юру Борисова обсуждают на западе а девочки делают тиктоки с Марком Эйдельштейном, написала тут небольшую рецензию на самый достойный просмотра фильм на 2025 год

8

9 Mar 2025, 20:03 UTC700 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Есть вопросы к игре Галь Гадот? У меня да

🔥1

8 Mar 2025, 09:13 UTC596 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всех прелестных дам этого канала поздравляю с праздником🌸 Спасибо, что читаете меня (а еще приятней когда комментируете)

🔥54❤‍🔥2

5 Mar 2025, 17:49 UTC516 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну а в связи с таким невероятным инфоповодом о невероятном режиссере невероятных шедевров по типу «Защитники», я ОЧЕНЬ рекомендую почитать вам вот этот текст https://teletype.in/@kartozz/O-JwchxUIfN

🍾2🔥2

5 Mar 2025, 17:48 UTC416 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Антон Долин как-то очень удачно высказался про Андреасяна: «Он стремится быть тем официантом, который подходит к зрителю с вежливым „Кушать подано!“, нехватку оригинала и таланта он компенсирует попыткой удовлетворить запрос» Чем громче кричит человек, что ненавидит Тарковского, тем больше он мечтает о такой признательности. К сожалению или счастью, но у Сарика всегда будет второсортное кино, которое можно будет смо

❤‍🔥4🔥2

5 Mar 2025, 17:35 UTC350 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_moskvaVideo

«Я ненавижу Тарковского. Я ненавижу авторское кино. Если вы хотите быть нищими, кончеными, блюющими кинематографистами, идите нахер». В московском киноколледже из-за «Аноры», Тарковского и фестивального кино поругались студенты и кинорежиссер Сарик Андреасян. Из-за скандала режиссер покинул лекцию раньше времени под смех и аплодисменты студентов Московской международной киношколы. Встреча с будущими режиссерами и С

😭6🔥2🤔2

3 Mar 2025, 14:24 UTC278 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В каком же ахере ребята вчера были конечно

🔥63

3 Mar 2025, 14:12 UTC267 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Самое время разобрать Оскар 2025 года. Буду кратка Мои негодования: 1. Почему в момент памяти всем ушедшим актерам не забыли Мэгги Смит но ЗАБЫЛИ Чэнса Педромо и Мишель Трахтенберг? Очень странно, если вы хотите почтить память актеров Голливуда будьте добры включить ВСЕХ 2. Выступление Маргарет Куолли , Лисы и других — худший способ отдать дань Джеймсу Бонду. Постановка ужас 3. Ариана Гранда проиграла во всех воз

8🔥2

25 Feb 2025, 13:42 UTC236 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Гении, просто гении Вот так надо культуру свою привносить

🔥53❤‍🔥2

12 Feb 2025, 13:17 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А тут еще делюсь официальным полноценным трейлером "Как приручить дракона" 2025 год обещает быть кино-интересным, столько новинок и продолжений, жду!

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vareshkaokino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Варежка о кино” (@vareshkaokino), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vareshkaokino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.