Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Женсонесса Рысь

Channel

Женсонесса Рысь

@varenik_ris

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001832743985
TypeChannel
Username@varenik_ris
DescriptionАвторский канал царинессы советского сентиментального романа, основоположницы «литературы травмы», авторки и фем-активистки Женсонессы Рысь. Все тут - выдумка. А правда - лишь Я.
Created20 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/varenik_ris

Growth

1106 August 2026 — 110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:16110no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:35110first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
35
Videos
1
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7935.3%
🍓4218.8%
🍾4017.9%
156.70%
🔥146.25%
🎉83.57%
🤣73.13%
👏41.79%
🕊31.34%
👍20.893%
🤩20.893%
🍌10.446%
🎄10.446%
🐳10.446%
👻10.446%
💯10.446%
😭10.446%
😱10.446%
🙈10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 13 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Feb 2026, 17:36 UTC84 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вы не поверите: меня вновь выписали из дурки!

🤣76🍓4🍾1😭1

12 Jul 2025, 14:03 UTC≈1,620 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну, меня вновь отпустили из дурки...

🍾118👏3🍓2🍌1

22 Jan 2025, 19:41 UTC375 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @e_jopovPhoto

"На редкое издание "Ног отчима", - пишет нам Ольга, а после одаривает деньгами. Спасибо! Старушка Женсонесса Рысь уже звонит издателю, требует от него! Мы же публикуем для Ольги юношескую фотографию авторки "Ног отчима". Да, когда-то Рысь еще была похожа на девушку.

🍓5🍾4💯1

22 Jan 2025, 19:41 UTC340 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я И СЕЙЧАС ВЫГЛЯЖУ КРУЧЕ МАЯКОВСКОГО!

🍓7

18 Jan 2025, 19:55 UTC339 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Да что там: не водочка даже, а ВОДОНЬКА!

😁7🍾4🐳1

18 Jan 2025, 19:55 UTC332 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Говорят, что мне к лицу водка. Не согласна! Не водка, а ВОДОЧКА!

🍾8

8 Jan 2025, 16:29 UTC812 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Редкая моя фотография. Только вышел первый тираж "Ноги отчима". Воронежские поэты еще не знают обо мне. Вокруг творческие казахи, миллионы и нет по утру похмелья. Золотые годы поздней юности...

😁7🍓4🙈1

31 Dec 2024, 13:27 UTC318 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я тут, на полу, в Ленинграде, а там, в Воронеже, ПОЭТЫ. Господи, лучше бы я вновь улетела в дурку...

😁7🍓1

27 Dec 2024, 10:26 UTC806 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все спрашивают, мол, какие условия в дурке. Прекрасные. Здесь все родные. Есть художники. Немного писателей. Заведующий из Воронежа показывает фото отдыха с Байкала.

😁5🍓1🎄1

24 Dec 2024, 19:49 UTC347 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Перепела в дурке легендарную Марину Зеброву. Ее гениальный хит "Дональд, Дональд, папа Римский" стал украшением "Камеди".

😁6🍓1

20 Dec 2024, 17:05 UTC785 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Оп! И вновь в дурке я!

🍾12🍓2🤩1

18 Dec 2024, 10:28 UTC381 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У меня еще спрашивают, мол, а с чего каждый раз говоришь о выходе из дурки? Во-первых, это красиво...

😁9🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @varenik_ris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 708,530 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женсонесса Рысь” (@varenik_ris), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/varenik_ris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.