Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ваня не только о фотографии

Channel

Ваня не только о фотографии

@vanyareviaka1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,231subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001914373034
TypeChannel
Username@vanyareviaka1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanyareviaka1

Growth

1,2311,2351,23319 September 2026 — 1,235 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,235 subscribers25 September 2026 — 1,231 subscribers19 September 202625 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,230–1,236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:171,231-4
19 Sept 2026, 05:221,235no change
19 Sept 2026, 04:471,235first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 1,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
545
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held13 (17 July 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total2,725
Reactions total257
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

550 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤31356.9%
😁488.73%
❤‍🔥437.82%
🍾376.73%
💯376.73%
🕊193.45%
🤣122.18%
💔81.45%
🔥71.27%
🤝71.27%
💘61.09%
💅50.909%
😭40.727%
👏20.364%
🍓10.182%
💩10.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 550 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC405 views82 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

у меня сегодня день рождения... 26 лет... ничего сказать не хочу, я просто счастливый

❤45🍾37

11 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC497 views50 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Принято считать, что литература и другие рассудительно-описательные формы искусства (кино, живопись и так далее) должны человека учить уму-разуму и духовно облагораживать. А если такого увлечения у тебя нет, и книжек ты не читаешь, и кино не увлекаешься, то ты — человек безграмотный и вот со следующего года точно начну читать по одной книге в месяц, чтобы хоть как-то морально расти. Откровенно говоря, это полнейшая …

❤50

5 Sept 2026, 11:14 UTC690 views57 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Сейчас в интернете вирусится одно эссе, в которой автор размышляет над давним неоромантическим вопросом: «Если птица влюбится в рыбу, где они будут жить?». Эссе это называть сложно, это, скорее, односторонние размышления меланхоличного человека о факте любви в невозможных условиях. Да, птица сможет на пару секунд нырять в воду, делая вид, что ее легкие не сгорают, а рыба сможет выпрыгивать из воды, доказывая самой с…

❤45💘6💯5🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC698 views61 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Друзья, знаете, жизнь оч интересная штука. Месяц назад у меня в Польше украили несколько документов, что послужило стартом такому развитию событий, что даже вспомнить дурно. Но в эти события, к большому моему счастью, вошел переезд из Варшавы в Минск. Поэтому до зимы мое пмж – Минск :) А что будет дальше – говорить не буду. Я вообще решил перестать на некоторое продолжительное время делиться личными вещами в интерне…

❤35❤‍🔥19💔6💩1

5 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,290 views54 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Я приезжаю в Беларусь с полностью обновленной личностью:

❤‍🔥20🕊19🤣12💔2❤1

2 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,060 views22 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Я ВИЖУ РУПОЛА ПИЗДДААААА ARE MY GAYS UP IN HERE?????????

❤17💅5

2 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC921 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤13🔥6

28 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,150 views35 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Если я еще раз увижу комментарии к любому виду оммажного искусства из разряда «не соответствует оригиналу!!!», «в книги, фильме, голове моей полоумной пробабки было по-другому!!!» я начну отстреливать людей. Если любой автор берет за основу что угодно, пускай книгу, он в праве делать с ней все, что захочет. Это персональный опыт и взгляд человека. Существуют не только прото-объекты искусства, а еще и -мета, и -пост.…

💯17😁9❤6👏2🍓1

28 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC831 views39 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤15💯13🤝7😭4

19 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC804 views24 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Дочитал (к сожалению) потрясающую книгу «Лада, или Любовь» Тимура Кибирова. Хочу оставить тут два отрывка-цитаты о творчестве и творческих людях: — Я ведь, в отличие от Левы Рубинштейна, не считаю, что «искусство ничему не учит и никуда не ведет». Да еще как учит, не меньше, чем семья и школа, только, к сожалению, все больше гадостям и пошлостям и ведет все чаще в такие места, куда ходить нам не велено и не нужно. …

❤24

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vanyareviaka1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шпаргалка для бренда
@iamshpargalka · 23,123
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ваня не только о фотографии” (@vanyareviaka1), 1,231 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanyareviaka1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.