Channel
@vanto2007
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004492131321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vanto2007 |
| Created | 31 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vanto2007 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:41 | 13 | +2 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:22 | 11 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 31 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (31 October 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 163 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 17.6% | |
| custom 4956591954088428445 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 6075603218719582815 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 6104789737699022982 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 6125321940526702975 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 6131925865061159505 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 4958728373900674046 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| custom 6105138768216332882 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| custom 4956557431141303451 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| custom 4956726373679891220 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| custom 6127351767840595915 | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
လှတာဗျ😝
❤1custom 49565574311413034511custom 49565919540884284451custom 49567263736798912201custom 49587283739006740461custom 60756032187195828151custom 61047897376990229821custom 61051387682163328821
Posted without readable text
💬New My Cus Review Is Here ⤵️ 𝙼𝚐 𝚟𝚊𝚗 𝚃𝚘 နဲ့ရောင်းဝယ်လုပ်ဖူးတဲ့သူတစ်ယောက်ချင်း 𝙼𝚐 𝚟𝚊𝚗 𝚃𝚘 နဲ့ရောင်းဝယ်လုပ်ရတာ အဆင်ပြေမပြေ / ယုံကြည်ရလား အစရှိတာတွေကို ကိုယ့်သဘောအတိုင်း အားမနာပဲ နောက်လူတွေသိအောင် ရေးသားပေးစေချင်ပါတယ်ဗျာ ✅ 👤Contact - @Van_To_2007 😐 Also - @ranksboss 😐 Beware of fake and scammer ‼️
❤5💘3💯3custom 49565919540884284451custom 49587283739006740461custom 60756032187195828151custom 61047897376990229821custom 61051387682163328821
Signed Epic ကြေးစားဆော့ပေးသည်
Main Channel [ @Cow_200789 ] ✅ NFT Chanel [ @nftstore57 ] ✅ Sellproofs [ @vanto255 ] ✅ Customer Reviews https://t.me/vanto2007/8 🔤🔤🔤 Owner - @Van_To_2007 ☎️Ph - 09988623903 🇲🇲⭐
custom 49565919540884284451custom 60756032187195828151custom 61047897376990229821custom 61253219405267029751custom 61273517678405959151custom 61319258650611595051
Signed Epic ကြေးစားဆော့ပေးသည်
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @vanto2007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙼𝚐 𝚟𝚊𝚗 𝚃𝚘 Game Shop” (@vanto2007), 13 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanto2007.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.