Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

/Р3СТ/ 𝓿𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐬 𝓴𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐧

@vanillahehe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

93subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004355256621
TypeChannel
Username@vanillahehe
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanillahehe

Growth

939493.510 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 94 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 93 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:1711 Aug 2026, 08:02
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93–94 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:0293-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:1794first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 93 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held8 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total272
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5323445967201016155623.1%
custom 5321037976606648101519.2%
custom 5231216329112982582415.4%
custom 5242466072526874072311.5%
custom 5397630012432098953311.5%
custom 5461016887838155922311.5%
custom 527153527447463520413.85%
custom 546324793007489411113.85%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ: @Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥲκ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

9 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ:@Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝—𐌺у-κу, у ϶ᴛ᧐ᥔ δρ᧐ ужᥱ ɸᥱᴛᥙɯ. 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥙκчᥲ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

custom 52424660725268740722custom 53210379766066481012custom 53234459672010161552

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

9 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ: @Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥲκ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

custom 53976300124320989532custom 52312163291129825821custom 54610168878381559221

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

8 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC98 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ: @Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝—𐌡ᥱнᥙʙᥲя ᥰᥙκчᥲ ᥴ Тρᴛρ, дᥱ᧘ᥲю ᥴ Вᥲнᥙ᧘᧘᧐ᥔ нᥲ 𝟐 ρядᥲ ρᥱᥲκцᥙᥔ 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥙκчᥲ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

custom 53234459672010161554custom 53210379766066481013custom 54610168878381559222custom 52312163291129825821custom 52424660725268740721custom 52715352744746352041custom 53976300124320989531custom 54632479300748941111

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

7 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC30 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 𓈒.ܸ݄ׅׅ֩ᰰⵂྀི𐇽ׅ֩ᰰ𝒄ۖ𝓾𝘁𐇽⃔𝗶ִ࣫౿᪾ܹ v𐐼ꨭ𐇽֢۫‌፝֟𓈒۫𝐧⃪ۣ࡙͠il𐑙‌‌ꪖ⵿ ِ֚𝃚 ꘩⃘𞥊֟፝۟

7 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

- ухожу в рест, совсем выгорнла от этого занятия. держусь що бы не удалить канал💍

custom 52312163291129825822

Signed 𓈒.ܸ݄ׅׅ֩ᰰⵂྀི𐇽ׅ֩ᰰ𝒄ۖ𝓾𝘁𐇽⃔𝗶ִ࣫౿᪾ܹ v𐐼ꨭ𐇽֢۫‌፝֟𓈒۫𝐧⃪ۣ࡙͠il𐑙‌‌ꪖ⵿ ِ֚𝃚 ꘩⃘𞥊֟፝۟

6 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ: @Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥲκ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

6 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗝 🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🤩🤩 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 Юᤋ: @Sweetc0quette 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🗝#𐌿ᥲκ #Дж᧐᧘ᥙᥴᥴᥲ🗝

Signed ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᤐֹ‌𝆋𐇽ܵۜ𝐛ꩌꨶꫀ‌‌⃪ᷓۢࠖ‌‌𝐫‌𝅦︩︪𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝐫‌︩ 𝅦𝆋᷍ᰰ⃪𝒚⃪⵿ؔ⃑᪾ Jܳۛ𖹭⃘҈֓.𝐥𑩚⃗⃖‌ᩬᰰ‌‌𝐢⃪͓࣪͡ડָׅ֗ꪳۢࠖ𝕤֮𝐚๊‌𝆋𐇽᳕ᵗ᷒ᰰ

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @vanillahehe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 585,541 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“/Р3СТ/ 𝓿𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐬 𝓴𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐧” (@vanillahehe), 93 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanillahehe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.