Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Благими Намерениями I Шедоуваниллы 18+

@vanilladominator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,787subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002462798483
TypeChannel
Username@vanilladominator
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanilladominator

Growth

1,7861,7961,7916 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,786 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,787 subscribers1,7876 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,785–1,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:451,787+1
9 Aug 2026, 11:321,786-9
6 Aug 2026, 20:001,795-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:331,796no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:241,796first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.5%
avg views ÷ 1,787 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (22 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,804
Reactions total791
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,646 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,27840.3%
custom 531240274299456020097817.3%
custom 545884578186999912097717.3%
🔥71812.7%
custom 52629662950280713334037.14%
custom 54158139290057749712394.23%
custom 5386507692107910141220.39%
custom 5415815831676283432160.283%
custom 5458375036274488500120.213%
custom 525173909589750410230.053%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,694reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,003
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 14 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
1,450
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vanilladominator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC444 views268 reactions50 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Миникомикс с этими ахуенными овце-цветками. Я не знаю при каких обстоятельствах это придумали, но букет невесты на свадьбе шв будет из них. (Соулджемы дорисую потом, наверно.)

🔥15067custom 526296629502807133344custom 54588457818699991205custom 53124027429945602002

18 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC≈2,360 views523 reactions107 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🌙 Артик на скорую руку. Я давно представляла эту сцену у себя в голове. Как шедоу и Ванилла сидят где-то на лугу, любуются видами и Ванилла невзначай задаёт этот вопрос. Думаю может как-то нарисовать миникомикс с этой сценкой, но пока только арт, т.к. сейчас занята другим, более масштабным комиксом. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️☀️

custom 5312402742994560200330custom 5262966295028071333101custom 54588457818699991207310🔥4custom 53865076921079101413custom 54158139290057749712

10 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC≈2,620 views263 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Ахринеть, я снова миллиардер😎 Паша Дуров завидуй. Спасибо большое 😭

189🔥42custom 541581392900577497127custom 53865076921079101412custom 54588457818699991202custom 52629662950280713331

10 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC≈3,230 views656 reactions1,450 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐇🐇🐇 Прошлый комикс набрал много реактиков, так что решила впервые за оч долгое время нарисовать эро арт в цвете, еще и на основу. Раз 20 уже передумала его постить, но ладненько. Немного отдохнула после комикса, пора работать над новым. Идею со звездочками на теле милка спиздила у Эр, оч люблю как это выглядит, захотела попробовать тоже. Я хотела сверху нарисовать планетарий, но государство не выдало бюджета, так чт

398custom 5458845781869999120136🔥82custom 541581392900577497127custom 52629662950280713339custom 53865076921079101413custom 53124027429945602001

2 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,800 views301 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо большое всем за реакты и коммы. Не зря страдала 😀

208🔥46custom 541581392900577497135custom 531240274299456020012

1 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈3,550 views850 reactions126 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сходу попрошу набрать тут 300+ реактиков, а то я чуть не померла, пока рисовала это😵 Знали бы вы сколько проблем было с комиксом, он должен был выйти еще 4 дня назад, но ибис пейнт сволочь, сломал мне файл и пришлось последние 4 страница начинать практически по новой (повезло что я сделала копию, но она была старой). Я оч устала так что тут моментами сильный филон 🆗 О комиксе. Я его начала еще в марте, после 15го

custom 5458845781869999120481175custom 5262966295028071333130custom 531240274299456020033custom 541581392900577497119🔥8custom 53865076921079101414

14 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC≈3,340 views590 reactions114 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀 Очередной быстрый чб скетчи в студию, который рисовался для щп. Для драматичности добавила строчки Клода Фролло из книги "собор парижской богоматери". В какой-то степени этот персонаж напоминает мне Шедоу Милка своей одержимостью, но в то же время отваржением чувств. «Обними меня, причини мне любую, боль, но только позволь мне быть с тобой. И в жизни и в смерти, и в вечном огне. Он вечным раем покажется мне» 😀

354custom 5458845781869999120115🔥69custom 531240274299456020018custom 541581392900577497113custom 52629662950280713338custom 54583750362744885007custom 54158158316762834324

10 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC≈3,240 views545 reactions28 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я теряю счёт времени. Целыми днями страдаю какой то херней, и вспоминаю что давно не рисовала. Вот быстрый скетч какой то картинки идею которой я спиздила у худа по небожителям. Следующий пост будет длинный комикс.

325custom 5312402742994560200114custom 545884578186999912071custom 541581392900577497115🔥10custom 54158158316762834324custom 52629662950280713333custom 53865076921079101412

4 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC≈3,500 views570 reactions20 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ Пока рисую кмм. Скоро будут комиксы

custom 5312402742994560200340121custom 541581392900577497180custom 545884578186999912015custom 52629662950280713336custom 53865076921079101415🔥2custom 54583750362744885001

28 May 2026, 17:41 UTC≈4,410 views566 reactions65 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

22 дня без постов на основе, это мой рекорд. Сделала измученный тренд на скорую руку, просто чтобы не было простоев. Качество артов так себе, давайте сделаем скидку на артблок и все такое. В общем, надеюсь на актив, а то я с ума сошла, пока делала это.

348custom 526296629502807133399custom 545884578186999912079custom 531240274299456020020custom 54158139290057749718custom 54158158316762834325custom 54583750362744885003🔥2

6 May 2026, 12:42 UTC≈4,130 views514 reactions37 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ждёте обновление которое нагло перенесли? В преддверии обновы, кину скетч шмилка, который я рисовала на стриме. Сделаем вид что рука не выглядит инородно, и карту я рисовала сама.

🔥303custom 531240274299456020010883custom 541581392900577497113custom 54158158316762834323custom 52517390958975041022custom 52629662950280713332

2 May 2026, 09:52 UTC≈3,800 views664 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пока рисую комикс, выложу такую милую коммишечку-(редрав). Я обычно не публикую их, но в этот раз сделаю исключение. Помним про реактики🌟

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vanilladominator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 231,791 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Благими Намерениями I Шедоуваниллы 18+” (@vanilladominator), 1,787 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanilladominator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.