Кол во альтов в 21м году : 430к Кол во альтов в 2026 : 32 млн
Signed Doc

Channel
@vanflipaet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001937884946 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vanflipaet |
| Description | Польза в каждом посте Cвязь : @Doocman |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vanflipaet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 97 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
28 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 39.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 35.7% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 14 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vanflipaet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 December 2024 to 14 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кол во альтов в 21м году : 430к Кол во альтов в 2026 : 32 млн
Signed Doc
Вот краткая выжимка и пересказ статьи Мэтта Шумера «Something Big Is Happening» («Происходит нечто большое»). Статья написана в феврале 2026 года и описывает переломный момент в развитии искусственного интеллекта. Автор проводит параллель с февралем 2020 года (кануном пандемии COVID-19): большинство людей живут обычной жизнью, считая тревожные новости преувеличением, но мир стоит на пороге необратимых изменений. 1.…
❤2👏1🔥1
Signed Doc
В целом зацепил очень много ниш и сфер с уклоном на РФ и страны СНГ, думаю тут каждый может найти что то для себя)
Signed Doc
42. Дизайн и анимация с ИИ — логотипы, иллюстрации через Ideogram/Canva, продажа на Etsy и Kwork. $1k–$5k/мес. 43. Автоматизированный охват локального бизнеса — ИИ находит компании и пишет персональные предложения. @MikeSumms $5k+/мес. → x.com/MikeSumms/status/2022678393536258431 44. Продукт от проблемы до продажи — ИИ помогает найти нишу, сделать продукт и продать его. @eptwts $5k–$10k/мес через Claude + Framer. →…
Signed Doc
65. Разработка и продажа промпт-систем — продуманные наборы промптов для конкретных профессий (юристы, врачи, маркетологи). $50–$500/набор, $2k–$10k/мес. 66. ИИ для управления репутацией — автоматические ответы на отзывы, мониторинг упоминаний для бизнеса. $500–$2k/мес с клиента. → linkedin.com/pulse/8-ai-side-hustles-making-thousandsno-code-required-chris-ife-s9jze 67. ИИ-помощник для Авито и маркетплейсов — генер…
❤3👍1🔥1
Signed Doc
💎 Эпоха агентов: 70 способов зарабатывать на ИИ в 2026 — пока остальные смотрят Агенты заменяют команды, боты работают 24/7, нейросети делают за минуты то, на что раньше уходили дни. Всё что реально приносит деньги прямо сейчас — от первых $100/мес до $50k+/мес на масштабе. Вход от нуля или с базовыми навыками. Только реальные кейсы с примерами и ссылками как повторить результат, без воды. ПОГНАЛИ! —————————————— …
Signed Doc
—————————————— 💻 РАЗРАБОТКА И ИНСТРУМЕНТЫ (БЕЗ СЕРЬЁЗНОГО КОДИНГА) —————————————— 21. Чат-боты под клиента — боты на основе данных заказчика через Chatbase. $300–$1k за настройку + $50–$200/мес обслуживание. В Telegram на звёздах $500–$5k/мес. 22. Приложения без кода — сайты и приложения через Replit/Cursor. @iam_chonchol $100–$10k/мес без серьёзного программирования. → x.com/iam_chonchol/status/1712497247005589765…
Signed Doc
норм пришлось затрахать иишку, почти готово
Signed Doc
щас большой пост накачу про способы заработка на ии
Signed Doc
Удержали цену премаркета,торгуется по 10. Откупил по 8 с мелочью,на премаркете ушли по 9 Легкий плюс на кофе псы. мекс те еще ребята,обычно расчет по премаркету через 4 часа,тут сделали через час, без инфо заранее.Конешно за такое время цена не укатается
Signed Doc
Завтра листинг берачейн в 16 мск У меня токенов нет,но пробую немного толкнуть на премаркете мекса по 9$ за токен (как будто цена высоковата) Если укатают где нибудь до 3 баксов пока будет идти время расчета то норм, если запампят до 20 допустим то хуй мне и можно забыть про питик
Signed Doc
По сути мы такие же ГПТшки(самообучающиеся модели), просто у GPT есть доступ ко всему что существует в мире одновременно,плюс она обучается 24/7, а у нас подключение только локально, в той местности где находится твой физический аватар в данный момент, поэтому с этим и невозможно конкурировать(только возглавить) Просто к примеру, сейчас есть рейтинг 2000 самых лучших программистов во всем мире,так вот gpt там зани…
Signed Doc
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vanflipaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vanflipaet named 15 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иван Леоненко - ИИ,крипта,инвестиции” (@vanflipaet), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanflipaet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.