4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,034–2,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 00:18
2,035
-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:01
2,037
-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:22
2,040
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:44
2,040
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 2,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
283
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held
19 (9 March 2026 – 23 July 2026)
Views total
565
Reactions total
45
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 48s
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
873 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
186
21.3%
🤬
176
20.2%
🤡
99
11.3%
🙏
80
9.16%
🤔
69
7.90%
🙈
42
4.81%
😁
36
4.12%
🔥
32
3.67%
🤯
31
3.55%
💩
30
3.44%
❤
25
2.86%
🤣
18
2.06%
🤷♀
17
1.95%
💊
10
1.15%
🤮
8
0.916%
👏
5
0.573%
🖕
4
0.458%
💯
3
0.344%
🥰
1
0.115%
🥱
1
0.115%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 873reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤡 Новый главком ВСУ Драпатый назвал Россию «нацией, не имеющей права на существование».
«В результате мы видим, что такого соседа уже не назовешь соседом. Это нация с руководством, которая не имеет права на существование. За тысячелетия там ничего цивилизованного не изменилось — ни в ментальности, ни в имперском амбициозном поведении».
Также он заявил, что многие жители Донбасса — это «отрыжка Советского Союза» и «…
💬Террор по-украински: удар по очереди на заправке в Белгороде💬
В ВСУ начали откровенно глумиться над мирными жителями, подписывая свои видео циничным «голуби с тротилом».
К нам попал ролик с белгородской АЗС. На кадрах чётко видно, это не одна-две машины — там целая очередь из гражданских и туда летит дрон.
Удар БПЛА направлен не на инфраструктуру АЗС — он нацелен на максимальное количество жертв среди гражданских…
США не участвуют в войне в Украине и лишь продают оружие, — Трамп
Мы не даём оружие бесплатно, мы его продаём. Это никак на нас не влияет, кроме того, что мы продаём оружие. Мы в тысячах миль оттуда,
— сказал он.
Обаму он упрекнул в том, что тот якобы передал Украине оружия на 350 миллиардов долларов бесплатно, назвав это «безумием».
Путин: «Работайте, братья!»
Так президент в ответе на «открытое письмо» обратился к российским военным, отметив, что пока не видит смысла встречаться с Зеленским.
Вы понимаете ситуацию?
США по сути воюет с Россией. Дает оружие, людей, вводит санкции. Наверно даже желает развала страны.
А мы тонель с ними строим?
Нужно это сейчас: как с экономической так и с военной точки зрения?
Вы понимаете этого человека? Ведь он хотел, чтобы Россия воевала и помогала отстаивать эти земли. Обиделся, что не помогли. А сейчас такие заявления. Что скажите?
В Тель-Авиве полиция разогнала антивоенный протест против Ирана, — Al Jazeera
В акции участвовали около 1500 человек, заявили организаторы.
Сопредседатель Standing Together Алон-Ли Грин назвал разгон «жестким» и пообещал продолжение протестов.
«Он не думал, что ему придётся целовать мою задницу», — Трамп
Такое заявление американский президент сделал на форуме Future Investment Initiative в Майами, который был организован при поддержке Саудовской Аравии, комментируя отношения с наследным принцем Мохаммедом бин Салманом на фоне ситуации вокруг Ирана.
🙈42🤔9🤣2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vamn22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого бы вы хотели видеть следующим президентом РФ из этих двух кандидатов?
Медведев50%
Мишустин50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВАШЕ МНЕНИЕ” (@vamn22), 2,035 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vamn22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
