4 measurements spanning 5 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,641–1,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:36
1,644
-7
10 Aug 2026, 05:51
1,651
-14
7 Aug 2026, 16:18
1,665
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:36
1,665
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.0%
avg views ÷ 1,644 subscribers
Avg views / post
971
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
19 (14 March 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
1,941
Reactions total
100
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
578 reactions across 19 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
277
47.9%
🔥
73
12.6%
😁
62
10.7%
🤔
31
5.36%
❤
22
3.81%
👏
18
3.11%
😱
13
2.25%
🤝
11
1.90%
🤬
11
1.90%
🤣
10
1.73%
🥱
8
1.38%
😢
7
1.21%
🕊
6
1.04%
💯
5
0.865%
🙉
5
0.865%
🤡
4
0.692%
🤷♂
3
0.519%
☃
2
0.346%
🆒
2
0.346%
🌚
1
0.173%
7 further kinds
7
1.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vamainvest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Позиция депозита стейблкойна USDG (GlobalDollarNetwork) в vault на лендинг-маркете Morpho.
Внося стейблкойны в vault, мы обеспечиваем ликвидность для займов под залог токенов USDe (низкий риск), syrupUSDG (низкий риск).
За лендинг мы будем получать доходность в 2.7%. Помимо этого, дополнительные награды в 4,28%. Награды приходят в steakUSDG.
Общая доходность позиции 7%.
TVL на данный момент 232млн$, а компания наг…
5 вариантов относительно безопасных позиций в DeFi сейчас:
1. AAVE Monad USDT. APR 6%. Награды в токенах MON. Я держу стейблы тут.
2. USDtb Morpho APR 11%. Награды в токенах USDtb. Компания продлится еще минимум 10 дней. Дальше, вероятно, будет продлена. Ссылка на компанию Merkl.
3. syrupUSDC/PYUSD Multiply Kamino. 11%. Позиция работает на дистанции полу года, без видимых просадок по доходности. Держал тут 90 дне…
Хочу поделиться каналом WE NEED CRYPTO своего знакомого.
Он занимается фармом фандинга между биржами и отработкой DEX бирж под аирдропы.
Направление интересное, особенно тем, что вы работаете только со стейблами. Не нужно закупать никакие монеты. Доход не привязан к фазе рынка, а в текущих реалиях это как никогда актуально.
На канале много обучающей инфы, есть бесплатный скринер для поиска связок по фандингу.
В об…
Вчера поставил новый рекорд профита по торговле мемами за день. И все благодаря скрипту, который разработал для меня подписчик и в прошлом клиент в ДУ по DeFi Александр @makarofalex.
Если у вас есть запрос на разработку сложных продуктов Web и Web3 (tg-боты, chrome расширения, AI-интеграции и др), то пишите в ЛС @makarofalex.
Ознакомиться с портфолио Александра можно по ссылкам:
https://www.makaroffalex.online/
htt…
Всем привет!
Нужен программист, который может написать небольшой и простенький скрипт для моей торговли мемами.
Напишите мне в ЛС @valerymaguylo
UPD. Уже нашел
Забросил этот канал, так как не знаю, о чем вам скидывать инфу.
Про DeFi публиковать с этого момента ничего не буду, так как уже все вывожу просто на холодный кошелек и буду холдить спотовый портфель без фарма.
Часть активов (ETH & USDC) в сети Mantle застряли на Aave, но надеюсь все разрешится. По USDC ликва периодически появляется и по тиху вывожу частями.
Про арбитраж тоже писать не буду, так как уже не занимаю…
В DeFi по прежнему безопасно держать активы.
По ходу взломали Drift на 200 млн$.
Ну в общем друзья расходимся. С фандингом на DEX можно заканчивать.
Инструмент хороший, рабочий но уже достали меня эти взломы.
Итак нет нормального заработка, да еще и обнуляют в один миг.
Кто еще не в курсе, я с начала февраля завел канал по торговле мемами на Solana и уже выложил отчет о результатах моей торговли в марте.
На сегодняшний день мой фокус внимания на 90% направлен именно туда и 10% на DeFi & арбитраж.
Так как времени свободного стало много и я перестал вести людей в ДУ из-за отсутствия адекватных финансовых результатов, то я решил посвятить себя полностью тренчам.
Кому интересно следи…
Если бы вы только знали сколько раз мне пишут в личку и предлагают на вас зарабатывать миллионы и делать запуски курсов по DeFi.
Но я человек добрый, с вас рубля не возьму за то, в чем не уверен и то, что не даст вам никаких результатов. Когда-нибудь может у меня будет свой продукт, за который не будет стыдно. Но не сегодня.
И этот продюсер еще начинает мне рассказывать сказки про мифические 50% годовых в DeFi.
Пр…
Новый лаунчпул на Bybit с токеном BASED.
Запустят 2 пула: $MNT & $BASED, куда можно закинуть копеечку и забрать % к депу.
Анонс тут.
На пул с $MNT выделят 2.100.000 (~$220к) токенов, а на пул с $BASED 900.000(~$90к)
Также, лимиты для MNT увеличили с 2000 до 5000/6000/10000/15000 в зависимости от уровня пользователя Bybit (Стандартный, Новый, VIP или Новый VIP).
Рекомендую понаблюдать 2-4 часа за тем, что будет с…
10% APR на USDC от EdgeX
Cегодня EdgeX совместно с USDC запустили кампанию с наградами в стейблах за удержание их на спотовом аккаунте.
Детали:
👍Лимит 10 000 USDC на аккаунт
👍Сроки до 23 апреля
👍Капа $30 млн. (1-ый сезон)
👍10% APR, награды распределяются ежедневно
👍Нет локов и/или подписок
Закинуть можно по ссылке:
Награды капают только на те стейблы, которые были закинуты с 23 марта. Любой перевод или вывод обн…
🔥7🥱5👍3🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vamainvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,312,309 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VAMA INVEST | DEFI | CRYPTO | STOCK MARKET” (@vamainvest), 1,644 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vamainvest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.