Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VALUE TRIAD 🧠🎯🐺

Channel

VALUE TRIAD 🧠🎯🐺

@valuetriad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003925514043
TypeChannel
Username@valuetriad
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 4 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/valuetriad

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

981021009 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers24 August 2026 — 101 subscribers1 September 2026 — 99 subscribers18 September 2026 — 98 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:3898-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:5399-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:18101-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:02102no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:31102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1965.5%
👎413.8%
❤310.3%
👏26.90%
👍13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🚨 Die Halbfinal-Analysen sind online! 🚨 🇫🇷 Frankreich vs Spanien 🇪🇸 🏆 Dienstag | 21:00 Uhr 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England vs Argentinien 🇦🇷 🏆 Mittwoch | 21:00 Uhr Unsere drei Experten haben beide WM-Halbfinals vollständig analysiert: 🧠 THE ANALYST – Formkurven, Taktik und erwarteter Spielverlauf 🕵️ THE INSIDER – Matchdynamik und mögliche Value-Szenarien 🎯 THE HUNTER – Torschützen, Schlüsselspieler und starke Quoten Zu beiden P…

👏1

13 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England vs Argentinien 🇦🇷 🏆 WM 2026 | Mittwoch, 15. Juli | 21:00 Uhr 🔥 HALBFINALE Ein Klassiker des Weltfußballs – Englands Mentalität gegen Argentiniens Titel-DNA. England kommt mit enormem Selbstvertrauen ins Halbfinale. Nach dem dramatischen 3:2 gegen Mexiko und dem hart erkämpften 2:1 nach Verlängerung gegen Norwegen hat die Mannschaft von Thomas Tuchel mehrfach bewiesen, dass sie auch unter höchstem Dr…

🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Die größeren klaren Chancen könnten jedoch auf französischer Seite entstehen. Ein spanischer Ballverlust im Aufbau oder ein schneller Angriff über Mbappé kann dieses taktisch enge Halbfinale entscheiden. ⏱ Halbzeit-Prognose: 0:0 ⚽ Endstand-Prognose: 1:0 🎯 Entscheidender Spieler: Kylian Mbappé

🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇫🇷 Frankreich vs Spanien 🇪🇸 🏆 WM 2026 | Dienstag, 14. Juli | 21:00 Uhr 🔥 HALBFINALE Defensive Perfektion gegen spielerische Dominanz – ein Duell auf Finalniveau. Frankreich und Spanien haben ihren Weg ins Halbfinale auf unterschiedliche Art gemeistert. Frankreich setzte sich im Viertelfinale souverän mit 2:0 gegen Marokko durch. Bereits zuvor blieb die Équipe Tricolore beim 1:0 gegen Paraguay ohne Gegentor. Die Fr…

❤1👎1🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

6.75 Quote drin 🚨💪🚨💪🚀🚀 Unsere Experten analysieren für euch heute die HF Spiele seid gespannt die Analysen folgen im laufe des Tages! 10x🔥 Reaktion für unsere Experten!

🔥2

10 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTCviews —

VALUE TRIAD 🧠🎯🐺 pinned «6,25 Quote drin ✅✅🚀✅🚀✅🚀✅✅ Frankreich liefert,liefert und liefert!»

10 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

6,25 Quote drin ✅✅🚀✅🚀✅🚀✅✅ Frankreich liefert,liefert und liefert!

❤2

9 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🚨 Alle Viertelfinals sind analysiert! 🚨 🇫🇷 Frankreich vs Marokko 🇲🇦 🏆 Donnerstag | 22:00 Uhr 🇪🇸 Spanien vs Belgien 🇧🇪 🏆 Freitag | 21:00 Uhr 🇳🇴 Norwegen vs England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🏆 Samstag | 23:00 Uhr 🇦🇷 Argentinien vs Schweiz 🇨🇭 🏆 Sonntag | 03:00 Uhr 🧠 4 Viertelfinals. 4 ausführliche Analysen. 🕵️ Insider-Insights. 🎯 Hunter-Tipps. 📊 Value-Prognosen mit starken Quoten. 🔥 Die WM geht in die entscheidende Phase. 🔥 Jeder F…

👍1

9 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇦🇷 Argentinien vs Schweiz 🇨🇭 🏆 WM 2026 | Sonntag 03:00 Uhr ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE ANALYST "Argentinien besitzt mehr individuelle Qualität und mehr Lösungen im letzten Drittel." ✅ Tipp: Argentinien kommt weiter 📈 Quote ca. 1.45 – 1.75 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🕵️ THE INSIDER "Die Schweiz wird dieses Spiel eng halten. Nach dem 0:0 gegen Kolumbien ist wieder ein taktisches Geduldsspiel zu erwarten." ✅ Tipp: Unter 2,5 Tore …

🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇳🇴 Norwegen vs England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🏆 WM 2026 | Samstag 23:00 Uhr ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE ANALYST "England hat mehr individuelle Breite und mehr Lösungen im letzten Drittel – aber Norwegen ist aktuell brandgefährlich." ✅ Tipp: England kommt weiter 📈 Quote ca. 1.65 – 1.95 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🕵️ THE INSIDER "Norwegen hat Brasilien nicht zufällig geschlagen. Gegen diese Offensive bleibt England kaum ohne Gegentor." ✅ Tipp: …

🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇪🇸 Spanien vs Belgien 🇧🇪 🏆 WM 2026 | Freitag 21:00 Uhr ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE ANALYST "Spanien wirkt im Turnierverlauf strukturierter, defensiv stabiler und kontrollierter." ✅ Tipp: Spanien kommt weiter 📈 Quote ca. 1.60 – 1.90 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🕵️ THE INSIDER "Belgien hat offensiv zuletzt stark geliefert – Spanien wird defensiv gefordert werden." ✅ Tipp: Beide Teams treffen – JA 📈 Quote ca. 1.80 – 2.15 ━━━━━━━━…

🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇫🇷 Frankreich vs Marokko 🇲🇦 🏆 WM 2026 | Donnerstag 22:00 Uhr ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE ANALYST "Frankreich hat mehr individuelle Qualität und wirkt defensiv stabil genug, um auch enge K.-o.-Spiele zu kontrollieren." ✅ Tipp: Frankreich kommt weiter 📈 Quote ca. 1.45 – 1.75 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🕵️ THE INSIDER "Marokko ist taktisch zu sauber, um hier komplett auseinanderzufallen. Das wird kein wildes Spiel." ✅ Tipp: Unter …

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @valuetriad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VALUE TRIAD 🧠🎯🐺” (@valuetriad), 98 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valuetriad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.