Channel
@valores_aeterni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
113subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002808912439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valores_aeterni |
| Description | Архитектор орг-трансформаций и автор методики «Карта развития». Пишу о системах, ценностях и телесных сигналах в работе. Тест: https://career-axis.ru/?utm_source=tg&utm_medium=bio&utm_campaign=profile |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valores_aeterni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 113 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 113 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 436 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 46.9% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 16.7% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.4% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 6.25% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💸 Кредит - это ставка на то, что завтра дороже, чем сегодня. Фундамент всей конструкции. Взял сейчас, вернул потом, разница - цена времени. Ирвинг Фишер описал, что происходит, когда цены идут вниз. Долг тяжелеет сам по себе - просто деньги подорожали. Дальше цикл разгоняет себя сам: должники распродают активы, чтобы гасить, распродажа роняет цены ещё ниже. Тут принято возражать: бывает и хорошая дефляция. Техноло…
🌏 Модели не одинаковые. Они по-разному понимают, что такое нормально. Это уже померили. Девятнадцать моделей попросили рассказать про политиков - почти четыре тысячи имён. Оценки разошлись по странам разработчиков. Вывод авторов простой: модель повторяет взгляды тех, кто её делал. В Китае это даже не побочный эффект, а закон. Генеративный сервис обязан держаться «основных социалистических ценностей». Не держится - …
🔥3❤1
🦾 Во Фримонте перестали делать машины и начали делать роботов. Ту же линию, где сходили Model S и X, переоборудуют под Optimus - производство запускают к концу лета, вторую фабрику в Техасе обещают к лету 2027. Hyundai строит завод на 30 000 роботов в год. В коде революция произошла, ожидаемо, тише. Есть агент Уроборос - он переписывает собственный исходник и каждое изменение коммитит сам себе, git-лог идёт вместо …
❤2👍1
🎭 Встречаем новый термин - Workslop. Помнишь понедельничную строчку Карпова - «как надо сказанные мне, но только все не те»? У неё нашёлся рабочий двойник. В Harvard Business Review это назвали workslop - выдача ИИ, которая выглядит как работа, но задачу не продвигает. Как надо, только не то. Цифры невесёлые. 41% сотрудников за месяц получали такое от коллег, на разбор каждого куска уходит почти два часа. И цепляет…
❤3
🧭 Я запустил задачу в конвейер, который собрала одна уникальная банда. И впервые даже не увидел ни строчки кода. Раньше harness (обвязку) я себе клепал сам, на коленке. А тут - профессиональный контур под целый проект. Я подаю на вход спецификацию и критерии приёмки. Дальше агент сам пишет код, а автоматический шлюз гоняет тесты и говорит «pass». Моя работа теперь - спека и правила игры, не строки. Рутина снялась по…
❤2🤝1
🎧 «Как надо сказанные мне, но только все не те». Строчка из песни Ивана Карпова "Актриса". И вот об этом инсайт прошлой моей рабочей недели. В составе организованной группы лиц собирали документ - большой, важный. Я скинул им свой набросок: сыро, скорее направление. Дальше по-честному могло пойти двумя путями (это уже он - инсайт). Путь простой: прислать обратно правдоподобное "что-то". Причесать мою правку, накида…
❤2😁2
Можно ли прослушивание ADDIS ABEBA считать терапевтической сессией 🙃? https://music.yandex.ru/album/7604901/track/53267038?utm_source=web&utm_medium=copy_link
❤2
Вот такой вот эксперимент! Смотреть в 360🥳 и 4к😇 🫠🫠🫠🫠 https://youtu.be/jnH3x8C7us8?si=TfI_uVuhevrw2Kxh
❤6👍2
Новости Восилия. Здравствуйте, маляты! Сегодня я хочу предложить вам абсолютно новый опыт в установке, настройке и взаимодействии с персональным ии-агентом. Достаточно три раза в день мазать... зайти в гигачат (внезапно) и отправить ссылку: https://github.com/Skunokil/vosmenog/blob/main/INSTALL_PROMPT.md и дальше просто следовать инструкциям. Лонгрид ниже для тех, кто не понимает зачем и нужно ли это им. Насколько…
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5
📡 «Делай хорошо - заметят». Это не работало никогда. Правило знакомое: молча тяни, и однажды оценят. Только оно никогда не работало - в него просто верили. И копили тихую обиду: я же пашу, почему не замечают. А потому что замечать нечего - кроме «я старался». В исследованиях рабочих групп сумма самооценок вклада стабильно переваливает за 100% - каждый видит себя чуть значительнее, чем видят его. Выход был один: уме…
❤3
😬😬😬
🤣6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @valores_aeterni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 644,298 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вечные ценности” (@valores_aeterni), 113 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valores_aeterni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.