Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Valore Privato

Channel

Valore Privato

@valoreprivato

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002430737579
TypeChannel
Username@valoreprivato
Created8 September 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/valoreprivato

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

707572.57 August 2026 — 73 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73 subscribers21 August 2026 — 75 subscribers5 September 2026 — 73 subscribers12 September 2026 — 72 subscribers29 September 2026 — 70 subscribers9 October 2026 — 71 subscribers717 August 20269 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 63 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 12:3771+1
29 Sept 2026, 09:2270-2
12 Sept 2026, 13:3972-1
5 Sept 2026, 12:0273-2
21 Aug 2026, 02:0275+2
9 Aug 2026, 22:1773no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:3173first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📊 Il Mondiale è stato solo un riscaldamento. Chiudiamo questa parentesi con un +7,22%, un buon punto di partenza in vista della vera stagione. ⚽ Il bello deve ancora arrivare: con l’inizio dei campionati avremo molti più dati, più opportunità e soprattutto più valore da sfruttare. 🎯 Come sempre, niente giocate forzate: poche, selezionate e con un reale vantaggio. Ci vediamo all’inizio dei campionati. Si riparte s…

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Under 1.5 cartellini Argentina ❌ Expected Argentina: 1.29. L’expected è vicino alla linea, ma rimane più orientato verso 1 cartellino che verso 2+ Con entrambe le squadre questa giocata è uscita nel 75% delle partite del Mondiale, mentre il bookmaker la quota al 47%. Un vantaggio teorico di circa 27%, che la rende una delle linee più interessanti.

14 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Under 25.5 falli totali ✅ Expected: 20.00 (9.25 + 10.75). 5 linee di vantaggio. Accaduto nell’83% delle partite del Mondiale per entrambe le squadre, mentre il bookmaker lo quota al 50%

11 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Over 2.5 cartellini + Under 10.5 corner ✅ Expected cartellini: 3.19 Expected corner: 7.39 Il vantaggio maggiore è sui corner, ma anche l’expected dei cartellini è favorevole. Accaduto nel 60% delle partite per entrambe le squadre, mentre il bookmaker lo quota al 48%.

11 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Handicap +2 corner ❌ Expected corner: 3.85 - 3.54. 1 linea di vantaggio. Accaduto nel 70% delle partite per entrambe le squadre, mentre il bookmaker lo quota al 52%.

11 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Under 2.5 cartellini ✅ Expected: 1.04 + 0.88 = 1.92. Le medie indicano un match con pochi cartellini, anche se l’expected è leggermente più vicino alla linea rispetto alle altre giocate. Accaduto nell’80% delle partite del Mondiale per entrambe le squadre: il valore è dato soprattutto dalle ottime medie recenti. Il bookmaker ce lo mette al 47%

10 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Over 8.5 tiri in porta ✅ Expected: 5.40 + 4.51 = 9.91 1 linea di vantaggio. Accaduto nel 70% delle partite, mentre il book lo quota al 58%.

8 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Expected tiri: 13.51❌ (+2 linee di vantaggio). Francia media 19.91 tiri, Marocco ne concede 7.11. Verificata nel 71% delle gare del Mondiale, mentre il book la quota come 54%. Value. 📈

7 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Under 26.5 falli ❌ Expected squadre: 11.32 + 13.36 = 24.68 2 linee di vantaggio. Accaduto nel 62,5% delle partite del Mondiale. Under 4.5 corner Colombia ✅ Media Colombia 3.74, Svizzera concessi 3.23. Accaduto nel 75% delle partite del Mondiale.

7 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

🚨 Dopo tanto tempo… si riparte. E lo faremo più forti di prima. 🚨 In questi mesi abbiamo lavorato dietro le quinte per riorganizzare il metodo e migliorare ancora di più la ricerca del valore nelle quote. 🎯 Da oggi l’obiettivo sarà uno solo: qualità prima della quantità. Non ci interesserà mandare tante scommesse, ma solo quelle che riterremo davvero di valore. Se in una giornata non ci saranno le condizioni giust…

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @valoreprivato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valore Privato” (@valoreprivato), 71 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valoreprivato.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.