π€©VALI MODS V76 ALL LINKS FIXED ENJOY FULL NIGHT π ‡οΈDOWNLOAD LINKS π https://t.me/VALIMODS_V65_all_link_fix_bot~start https://t.me/VALIMODS_V65_all_link_fix_bot~start
π54β€18π2β‘1

Channel
@valimodssetup
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
183,514subscribers
+29,720 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000β316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1003843081538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @valimodssetup |
| Description | π’πͺπ‘ππ₯ = @Valimods1 ππ‘π¦π§πππ₯ππ = https://www.instagram.com/vali_mods_offical?igsh=MWx4aHdqMTQ1dWRlYQ== |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 23 July 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/valimodssetup |
Gaming β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 183,514 | +21,081 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 162,433 | +1,562 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 160,871 | +48 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 160,823 | +795 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 160,028 | +663 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 159,365 | +4,029 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 155,336 | +353 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 154,983 | +962 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:48 | 154,021 | +1,234 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 152,787 | -38 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 152,825 | -448 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 153,273 | -305 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 153,578 | -158 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 153,736 | -195 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 153,931 | -260 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 154,191 | -267 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 154,458 | -346 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 154,804 | +457 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 154,347 | -51 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 154,398 | first reading |
601 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 116 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 532 of 535 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 601 (23 July 2026 β 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,133,774 |
| Reactions total | 81,155 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 30 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 125 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
144,148 reactions across 593 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 102,732 | 71.3% | |
| π | 7,810 | 5.42% | |
| π | 6,642 | 4.61% | |
| π | 6,155 | 4.27% | |
| π€© | 4,799 | 3.33% | |
| π | 2,341 | 1.62% | |
| β‘ | 1,839 | 1.28% | |
| πΏ | 1,509 | 1.05% | |
| π₯ | 1,501 | 1.04% | |
| πΎ | 1,349 | 0.936% | |
| π | 1,191 | 0.826% | |
| π | 1,146 | 0.795% | |
| π | 966 | 0.67% | |
| π«‘ | 953 | 0.661% | |
| π | 639 | 0.443% | |
| π | 560 | 0.388% | |
| π | 396 | 0.275% | |
| π₯° | 369 | 0.256% | |
| π | 349 | 0.242% | |
| π | 325 | 0.225% | |
| 4 further kinds | 577 | 0.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 594 of the 601 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 144,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 601 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @valimodssetup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 601 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
π€©VALI MODS V76 ALL LINKS FIXED ENJOY FULL NIGHT π ‡οΈDOWNLOAD LINKS π https://t.me/VALIMODS_V65_all_link_fix_bot~start https://t.me/VALIMODS_V65_all_link_fix_bot~start
π54β€18π2β‘1
π¨ πͺππππ’π π π§π’ π©πππ π π’ππ¦ π’ππππππ β πALL SERVERV65 BODY HEADSHOT + HOLOGRAM 64 BIT DEVICES https://www.mediafire .com/file/n9nomwanwoum20d/VALI_MODS64.apks/file πALL SERVERV65BODY HEADSHOT + HOLOGRAM 32 BIT DEVICES https://www.mediafire .com/file/n9nomwanwoum20d/vali mods 32.apks/file πSET UP VEDIO WATCH CAREFULLY https://youtu.be/RkqOnDQwyHA?si=U0r26PRaxk2_ieIx πMT MANAGER APK#β£ https://t.me/VALIMODSFREEKEYBOT?starβ¦
π42β€21π1π1
SOME DEVICE LOADING PROBLEM COMING SOON NEW VERSION πΏ
β€2,990π714π145π«‘109πΏ62π52π50π€41
Photo, posted without a caption
π982β€462πΏ67π42π36β‘35π33π33
Super working bro no Ban no black list no auto back
β€349π161π31π14β‘12π11πΎ10π«‘9
vali bhai on top π π
π227β€111πΎ15π6π5π€5π4π3
mast panel hain vai..... Vali on top β€οΈβ€οΈ.......bd server op working
β€160π93π21π«‘12πΎ5π4π3π3
Photo, posted without a caption
β€161π87π10πΎ8π7π₯6π5π3
Photo, posted without a caption
β€108π62π7π5π3π3
Vali Bhi On Top Bd server me tabahi π
β€125π56π11π7πΏ5π4πΎ4β‘3
Kay ha bhai a... A too alagi lavil kaa
β€142π52π13β‘10π4π3πΎ1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€128π41π18π₯6π3β‘2π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 601 posts we hold for @valimodssetup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@valimodssetup edited 3 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ©πππ π π’ππ¦ πβ (@valimodssetup), 183,514 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valimodssetup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.