Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Valery Trading

Channel

Valery Trading

@valeryEAs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,063subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454820750
TypeChannel
Username@valeryEAs
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/valeryEAs

Growth

9,0489,1099,078.57 August 2026 — 9,109 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,109 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,108 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,077 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,071 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,048 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,063 subscribers9,0637 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,039–9,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 13:549,063+15
26 Aug 2026, 21:179,048-11
23 Aug 2026, 17:359,059-12
20 Aug 2026, 05:279,071-6
17 Aug 2026, 10:139,077-11
13 Aug 2026, 23:169,088-9
10 Aug 2026, 16:149,097-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:419,108-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:459,109no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:399,109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 9,063 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 February 202627 August 2026)
Views total2,681
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC901 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Yearly access at a lower price?

  1. Yes, definitely27%
  2. Maybe, depending on the price54%
  3. No, I prefer lifetime licenses19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @easyalgosPhoto

⚡️ Get Better Results On Every Trade: Introducing Precision Accounts [Now Live] Better execution can make a real difference to your trading results. That’s why EasyAlgos users can now access exclusive 'Precision accounts' with IC Markets and IC Trading. These accounts are designed to reduce the hidden trading costs that every trade you place, including slippage, market impact, liquidity depletion, last look, and

21 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @easyalgosPhoto

🧠 Introducing AlgoScore™ [Now Live] After months of internal development and testing across our ecosystem, we’re rolling out something that changes how you evaluate algorithmic trading performance. Meet AlgoScore™ — our proprietary scoring system designed to measure the real quality of an Expert Advisor. Not just growth. Not just drawdown. But the full picture. Why we built this One of the biggest problems in t

9 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @easyalgosPhoto

👻 The Gold Phantom EA Is Now Live Good news! The Gold Phantom Expert Advisor by Wim Schrynemakers is officially available inside EasyAlgos and ready to deploy. The System Is Live If you're already onboarded, The Gold Phantom EA can now be accessed directly through your dashboard. No complicated setup. No manual configuration. Just immediate access to a precision-built Expert Advisor engineered specifically for X

17 Jun 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,110 viewsread 28 August 2026

It has come to our attention that fake groups are mimicking Valery Trading to sell fraudulent Expert Advisors. Please protect your capital and stay safe by remembering these 4 rules: 1️⃣ We will NEVER message you first. Anyone sending you a DM out of the blue offering discounts or support is a scammer. 2️⃣ Double-check usernames strictly. Scammers swap letters (like a lowercase "l" for a capital "I") to look offic

6 May 2026, 14:04 UTC≈3,890 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Sentinel AI: Final Hours Under $1,000 Sentinel AI has reached $999, just one dollar away from crossing the $1,000 threshold. Once we hit that four-figure mark, there's no going back. The early-stage pricing window closes permanently, and the next price jump will be significant. This Is Your Last Stand We've watched you secure your licenses daily, each one bringing us closer to this inevitable milestone. The m

23 Apr 2026, 13:31 UTC≈3,410 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @algocratPhoto

📈 64.81% In 90 Days [Q1 Performance Report] The first quarter of 2026 is officially in the books, and we're thrilled to share the exceptional results we got at Algocrat AI. After the foundational work we completed throughout 2025—refining our algorithms, enhancing risk management, and strengthening our infrastructure—these numbers represent the payoff our long-term traders have been waiting for. Legacy Portfolio P

22 Apr 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,360 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Sentinel AI: Price Increasing Each Day What a launch. Sentinel AI has seen a very strong response since going live, with licenses being secured daily by traders who wanted access early. As a result, the price has now increased to $799. And this is only the beginning. The planned final price is $2,800, with increases continuing as more licenses are taken. If you've been watching from the sidelines, this may be

15 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Sentinel AI: Now Live [Official Launch] The wait is finally over. Sentinel AI is officially available — the Expert Advisor that has been running live since 2019, with no losing months on record. The launch price is JUST $499, and it goes up every 10 licenses sold. Get yours now before the price goes up: 🌐 Website: Click Here To Buy On Our Website 📦 MQL5 (MetaTrader 5): Click Here To Buy on MQL5 (MT4) 📦 MQL5

13 Apr 2026, 14:04 UTC≈2,990 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Why Sentinel AI Waits When Others Rush In Since we introduced Sentinel AI and shared its verified Myfxbook track record, we've received a lot of feedback from you. Two questions in particular keep coming up in different forms. You asked: 1. Why does it trade GBPUSD and EURUSD when the track record shows mostly GBPUSD? 2. Why are there sometimes months with no trading activity? Let's dive in. The Multi-Pair S

8 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC≈2,890 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔬 Sentinel AI Back-Testing Data Revealed [Download Now] Following up on the verified MyFxBook live results we shared in our last post, today we're taking a step further. We're making public the back-testing data for Sentinel AI, covering over a decade of market history with 100% quality tick data. While back-tests are never a guarantee of future performance, they are a powerful way to see how a strategy could have

1 Apr 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⛏ Golden Pickaxe Critical Update Golden Pickaxe hasn't been trading this year, and we finally identified the culprit: an outdated spread filter that was blocking all entries. By default, Golden Pickaxe used a fixed spread filter of 50 pips. But here's what happened: gold's dramatic surge caused spreads to widen significantly, and brokers expanded them even further due to increased volatility. The result? Our EA w

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @valeryEAs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTCAnonymous Poll323 voters

Yearly access at a lower price?

  1. Yes, definitely27%
  2. Maybe, depending on the price54%
  3. No, I prefer lifetime licenses19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Mar 2026, 13:01 UTCAnonymous Poll308 voters

We’re considering adding EasySentinel EA to the ValeryTrading lineup and offering it both on our website and on MQL5. Would you like that?

  1. Yes, add it61%
  2. No, keep current lineup8%
  3. I’d like more details first31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,394,060 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valery Trading” (@valeryEAs), 9,063 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valeryEAs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.