Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دعاوی مِلکی

Channel

دعاوی مِلکی

@vakil_melki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,670subscribers

+121 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001498470570
TypeChannel
Username@vakil_melki
Descriptionمحسن رفعتی -وکیل پایه یک دادگستری ارتباط در واتس اپ 09100515636
Created28 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vakil_melki

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,53912,71112,6256 August 2026 — 12,549 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,547 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,544 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,543 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,542 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,539 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,540 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,544 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,549 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,560 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,560 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,562 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,565 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,566 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,568 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,566 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,560 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,561 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,560 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,559 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,560 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,552 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,557 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,552 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,544 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,561 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,623 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,657 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,692 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,696 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,698 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,705 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,708 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,711 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,710 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,708 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,705 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,701 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,697 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,694 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,690 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,691 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,690 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,683 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,678 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,672 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,667 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,670 subscribers12,6706 August 20265 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 91 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,513–12,737 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 17:2012,670+3
4 Nov 2026, 14:2712,667-5
2 Nov 2026, 15:1412,672-6
31 Oct 2026, 12:1112,678-5
30 Oct 2026, 14:1012,683-7
29 Oct 2026, 16:5612,690-1
28 Oct 2026, 18:3912,691+1
27 Oct 2026, 15:1112,690-4
26 Oct 2026, 15:0912,694-3
25 Oct 2026, 12:5712,697-4
24 Oct 2026, 09:3012,701-4
23 Oct 2026, 07:2612,705-3
22 Oct 2026, 05:1912,708-2
21 Oct 2026, 01:5912,710-1
18 Oct 2026, 22:5712,711+3
17 Oct 2026, 20:4112,708+3
16 Oct 2026, 18:4112,705+7
15 Oct 2026, 16:5012,698+2
14 Oct 2026, 15:2712,696+4
13 Oct 2026, 07:4612,692first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 12,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,310
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.436%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held27 (29 May 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total21,540
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,170
Videos
≈175
Links
≈686

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

410 reactions across 27 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22454.6%
👍12831.2%
👎4511.0%
🤔102.44%
😱30.732%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 410 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,500 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026

فقهای شورای نگهبان: مالکیت معتبر مردم در بسترهای سابق رودخانه‌ها باید رعایت شود در پی شکایت از مواد (۷) و (۸) «آیین‌نامه مربوط به بستر و حریم رودخانه‌ها، انهار، مسیل‌ها، مرداب‌ها، برکه‌های طبیعی و شبکه‌های آبرسانی، آبیاری و زهکشی»، مصوب سال ۱۳۷۹ هیئت وزیران، موضوع از جهت انطباق با موازین شرعی به فقهای محترم شورای نگهبان ارجاع شد. این دو ماده، اجاره بستر رودخانه‌ها برای کشت موقت و اجاره بسترهای سابق برای اجرای طرح‌ها…

❤17👎2

18 Oct 2026, 07:18 UTC≈3,810 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

بلاتکلیف گذاشتن زمین مردم برای سال‌ها بدون تعیین کاربری، خلاف شرع است؛ در صورت ضرورت محدودیت مالکیت، خسارت مالک باید جبران شود فقهای شورای نگهبان در بررسی شکایت مربوط به «گستره طرح‌های ویژه» در طرح تفصیلی شهر اصفهان، اعلام کرده‌اند که نمی‌توان زمین‌های مردم را بدون دلیل ضروری و صرفاً برای احتیاط، برای مدت نامعلوم بلاتکلیف گذاشت و مانع بهره‌برداری مالک از ملک خود شد. ماجرا از این قرار است که در طرح تفصیلی اصفهان، بر…

❤11👍4

15 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,980 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

رأی وحدت رویه جدید: خسارت تأخیر چک‌های بالای ۵ سال از «تاریخ سررسید» محاسبه می‌شود هیئت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور با صدور رأی وحدت رویه جدید، بر نظر هیئت پیش‌نشست وحدت رویه پژوهشگاه قوه قضاییه صحه گذاشت و اعلام کرد گذشت بیش از پنج سال از تاریخ صدور چک، مانع از محاسبه خسارت تأخیر تأدیه از تاریخ سررسید سند نخواهد بود. هیئت عمومی دیوان عالی کشور در جلسه مورخ ۲۱ مهرماه ۱۴۰۵، پرونده وحدت رویه شماره ۱۴۰۵/۲ را با موضوع «تع…

❤12👎5

10 Oct 2026, 10:09 UTC≈6,210 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🏢 امکان صدور پایان‌کار آپارتمان با پرداخت سهم بدهی هر مالک هیئت دولت آیین‌نامه تبصره ۶ ماده ۱۰ قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول را تصویب کرد. بر اساس این مصوبه، مالکان واحدهای آپارتمانی می‌توانند با پرداخت سهم خود از بدهی‌ها و جرایم مربوط به ساختمان، برای دریافت پایان‌کار واحدشان اقدام کنند. پیش از این، عدم همکاری برخی مالکان در پرداخت بدهی‌ها می‌توانست روند دریافت پایان‌کار و سند سایر واحدها را نیز …

❤16👍8

7 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈5,040 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026

آغاز جایگزینی تدریجی سند تک‌برگ با سند مالکیت الکترونیک معاون توسعه فناوری و خدمات الکترونیک ثبتی سازمان ثبت اسناد و املاک کشور از صدور هم‌زمان سند مالکیت الکترونیک به همراه سند فیزیکی تک‌برگ خبر داد. سند الکترونیک به تدریج جایگزین سند تک‌برگ ملک خواهد شد. @vakil_melki

👍12👎6❤1

18 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC≈7,090 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026

چه معاملاتی باید در سامانه ثبت الکترونیک اسناد ثبت شوند؟ در حال حاضر، با توجه به مقررات قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول، الزام به ثبت معاملات در سامانه ثبت الکترونیک اسناد نسبت به املاکی که اسناد مالکیت تک‌برگ آن‌ها از تاریخ ۱۴۰۳/۰۴/۰۳ به بعد صادر شده، جاری است و معاملات مشمول ماده ۱ قانون باید به صورت رسمی و در سامانه ثبت الکترونیک اسناد ثبت شوند. در خصوص املاکی که اسناد مالکیت تک‌برگ آن‌ها از تاریخ…

👍14❤12

22 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈7,510 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

اگر آپارتمانی دارید که هنوز سند تک‌برگ سبز رنگ ندارد، می‌توانید آن را به صورت عادی منتقل کنید. طبق نظریه مشورتی، اگر آپارتمان هنوز تفکیک نشده و فاقد سند مفروزی (۶ دانگ) باشد، انتقال خودِ آپارتمان بدون ثبت در سامانه، از شمول ماده ۱ قانون الزام خارج است. حتی اگر عرصه (زمین) ملک سند تک‌برگ سبز رنگ داشته باشد، این حکم درباره انتقال خودِ آپارتمان برقرار است. نظریه مشورتی شماره ۷/۱۴۰۴/۷۲۰ تاریخ نظریه: ۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۱۸ @vaki…

❤18👍6

20 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈6,080 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

آیا قرارداد خصوصی حق‌الوکاله، در صورت مغایرت با قرارداد الکترونیک، معتبر است؟ در این خصوص، نظریه مشورتی شماره ۷/۱۴۰۲/۷۰۱ اداره کل حقوقی قوه قضاییه، صرف عدم ثبت قرارداد خصوصی در سامانه و تفاوت مبلغ آن با وکالت‌نامه را موجب بطلان قرارداد ندانسته و مبلغ بیشترِ مورد توافق را ملاک ابطال تمبر مالیاتی اعلام کرده است. اما دیدگاه دیگری نیز مطرح است؛ با توجه به الزامات آیین‌نامه اجرایی لایحه استقلال کانون وکلا (بند ۲ ماده ۷۶…

❤13

15 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈6,070 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

طبق این نظریه مشورتی اسناد رسمی صادرشده مطابق قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول، قابل ابطال هستند و ثبت رسمی معامله مانع از طرح و رسیدگی به دعوای بطلان آن نیست. @vakil_melki

👍11❤6👎1

13 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈6,150 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

جهاد کشاورزی نمی‌تواند برای زمین‌های کشاورزی دارای بنای برائت‌شده از دادگاه، صرفاً به دلیل مساحت زمین، از تشکیل پرونده و طرح آن در کمیسیون تبصره یک ماده یک خودداری کند. هیأت عمومی دیوان عدالت اداری طی دادنامه شماره ۱۴۰۵۳۱۳۹۰۰۰۰۹۸۲۲۹۶ مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۴/۲۳ اعلام کرد که حدنصاب‌های تعیین‌شده برای تشکیل پرونده مستحدثات برائت‌شده، به دلیل استناد به بخشنامه‌ای که قبلاً توسط هیأت عمومی ابطال شده بود، غیرقانونی و خارج از حدود صلاح…

❤1

28 Jul 2026, 02:02 UTC≈6,390 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @amlac_kar_bordi

نقدی بر خلأ تقنینی ماده ۱۰ قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول ماده ۱۰ قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول و آیین‌نامه اجرایی آن، با هدف ساماندهی وضعیت املاک فاقد سند رسمی و تحقق پوشش حداکثری صدور اسناد مالکیت، فرصت دو ساله‌ای را برای ثبت ادعاهای متصرفان و مدعیان واجد شرایط پیش‌بینی کرده است. قانون‌گذار نیز با وضع تبصره‌های متعدد، از جمله تبصره‌های ۲، ۳، ۴، ۶، ۸ و ۱۰، تلاش کرده است وضعیت گروه‌ه…

❤19👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @vakil_melki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شهرداد
@dadshahr96 · 19,819
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
کانال تخصصی(کاربردی وکلا) 👩‍🎓🧑‍🎓
@karbrditaKassiwkllbrtar · 20,453
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دعاوی مِلکی” (@vakil_melki), 12,670 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vakil_melki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.