8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,684–16,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:08
16,691
-7
12 Aug 2026, 18:33
16,698
-6
11 Aug 2026, 19:57
16,704
-8
10 Aug 2026, 23:11
16,712
-7
9 Aug 2026, 23:33
16,719
-4
8 Aug 2026, 19:21
16,723
-10
7 Aug 2026, 17:40
16,733
-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:48
16,740
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
42
Videos
21
Links
99
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 51s
Average length
1m 58s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,194 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,992
54.3%
👍
2,843
30.9%
😱
539
5.86%
😢
248
2.70%
👏
146
1.59%
🔥
124
1.35%
👎
114
1.24%
🙏
86
0.935%
😐
38
0.413%
🥰
32
0.348%
😁
23
0.25%
🤬
9
0.098%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2023 to 29 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vahidgeek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2023 to 29 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
آیا احتمال قطعی اینترنت وجود دارد؟
آبان ۹۸ با تکیه بر زیرساخت شبکه ملی، اینترنتهای خانگی و همراه به طور کامل قطع شد ولی اینترنت دیتاسنترها برقرار بود. به علت عدم آگاهی عمومی تقریبا دسترسی همه مردم به اینترنت قطع شد ولی سرویسهای عمومی/خدماتی/دولتی به کارشون ادامه دادن.
الان اما به دلیل اعمال محدودیتهای شدید از شهریور ۱۴۰۱ و موج آگاهی رسانی و آموزش عمومی، شرایط خیلی عوض شده و اگه حکومت تصمیمی بر قطع اینترنت بگیره ا…
فیلترینگ یوتوب
در صحبتم با پیوست، تاکید کردم بدون توجه به کاهش درآمد یوتوبرهای ایرانی و بدون توجه به خسارتی که به کاریکاتورهای بومی یوتوب میخورد، که هر دو تاکنون از فیلترینگ بهره بردهاند، حق کاربر ایرانی است که به محتوای اصیل یوتوب دسترسی آزاد داشته باشد.
البته تکلیف بهرهی مالی یوتوبرهای ایرانی که ثمرهی غیر ارادی فیلترینگ بوده و دخالتی در این موضوع نداشتهاند جدا از کاریکاتورهای بومی یوتوبه که رشد اونها برپایه…
همگی دعوتید به گفتگوی امشب من و یاشار در اسپیس شبکه اکس(توییتر) در خصوص امنیت کاربر در فضای مجازی، گفتگوهای ناشناس/امن و عملکرد باتهای تلگرامی.
https://x.com/vahidfarid/status/1826651277088223507
@VahidGeek
بارها دربارهی باتهای ناشناس تاکید کردم که "ناشناسِ امن" نداریم، حالا اما امیرمحمد و یاشار چندتا از همین ناشناسهای امن رو هک کردن، صدها میلیون چت ناشناس که خیلیهاشون به هویت واقعی افراد لینک شده...
vahidfarid
۱۰ روز پیش امیر [AmirMSafari] به ۳ تا از باتهای ناشناس نفوذ کرد و صحنههایی دیدیم که شوکه شدیم.
از ۱۴ میلیون یوزر، ۴۵۰ میلیمون چت، ۱۱ میلیون عکس و ۳ میلیون ویدیو ذخیره شده بود!
یه فیچر داشت که یه یوزر رو fl…
برای فعال کردن کانفیگهای تروجان روی ورکر میتونید در بخش تنظیمات اپ کلاینت (مثلا v2rayNG) آدرس DNS رو به 9.9.9.9 تغییر بدید.
آپدیت:
روی همراه اول هم همین تنظیمات باعث فعال شدن و بهبود سرعت کانفیگها میشه.
@VahidGeek
نسخه ۲.۴ ورکر v2ray
نسخه جدید ورکر v2ray آماده شد و میتونید از لینکهای زیر این نسخه رو دریافت و برای خودتون کانفیگ رایگان درست کنید.
امکانات جدید این نسخه:
▪️اضافه شدن کانفیگهای تروجان داخلی.
▪️انتخاب خودکار پراکسی برای بازکردن سایتهای پشت شبکه کلادفلر.
▪️امکان محدود کردن کشور در کانفیگهای داخلی (فقط برای سایتهای پشت شبکه کلادفلر).
▪️کاهش مصرف KV.
▪️کاهش چشمگیر خطای requestها در کانفیگهای داخلی.
لینک نسخه ۲.…
هشدار عدم استفاده از NekoBox نسخه گوگلپلی
اکانت MatsuriDayo در گیتهاب اعلام کرده که کنترل نسخهی گوگلپلی رو از دست داده و نسخهی اندروید Nekobox از ماه جاری میلادی روی گوگل پلی توسط طرف سوم کنترل میشه، قابل اطمینان نیست و از کاربران خواسته که به هیچ عنوان دانلود نکنن.
اگه از نکوباکس اندروید استفاده میکنید، نسخهی گوگلپلی رو فعلا آپدیت نکنید و در صورت نیاز، از روی گیتهاب نصب کنید تا وقتی رفع مشکل رو اعلام کنن.…
نسخه جدید ورکر v2ray
کد جدید ورکر v2ray (نسخه ۲.۳) آماده شد و میتونید به سادگی برای خودتون یک vpn رایگان بسازید.
تمام امکانات این نسخه بدون فعالسازی پنل هم در دسترسه:
۱. ترکیب کانفیگهای رایگان vless/vmess با ورکر.
۲. رفع مشکل مصرف بالای KV در vless داخلی ورکر.
۳. اضافه شدن ایپی پراکسی برای رفع مشکل بازکردن سایتهای مبتنی بر کلادفلر در vless داخلی.
۴. امکان فعالسازی فرگمنت برای بخشی از کلاینتها.
۵. امکان مسدودسازی …
داستان فرگمنت
چون در مورد #فرگمنت کمتر صحبت شده و دوستان زیادی نمیدونن چطور استفاده کنن یه داستان بگم براش، یه مدته داستان نگفتم :)
ما وقتی درخواست HTTPS/WSS میفرستیم سمت سرور، کل اطلاعات با پروتکل TLS رمزنگاری میشه و بین راه قابل مشاهده نیست در نتیجه هکر/فیلترچی نمیتونه ببینه چه خبره.
اما اینجا یه مشکلی وجود داره! زمانی که پای CDN/Reverse Proxy میاد وسط تا از سرور ما محافظت کنه، لازمه که نام دامین مقصد رو بدونه …
اسکنر آیپی تمیز برای v2rayNG
برای v2rayNG یه PR ارسال کردم تا امکان اسکن آیپیهای CDN به این اپ اضافه بشه. فعلا من آیپیهای کلادفلر رو دادم ولی ظرفیت توسعه برای تمام CDN ها رو تو اپ دیدم برای آینده.
اگه دوست دارید این امکان به برنامهی v2rayNG اضافه بشه، در گیتهاب upvote کنید:🌱
https://github.com/2dust/v2rayNG/pull/2918
روش کار به این صورته که ابتدا یک کانفیگ سالم پشت کلادفلر (یا هر cdn دیگهای که بعدا به اپ …
❤390👍65😱14👏13🔥8👎7🙏4🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vahidgeek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 236,646 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mahsa Net @mahsa_net · 135,900 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Hiddify @hiddify · 123,129 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist @Playlistpodcas · 152,279 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VahidGeek” (@vahidgeek), 16,691 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vahidgeek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.