https://substack.com/@drjudywilyman/note/c-309664901?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=o0ti7

Channel
Vaccination Decisions
@vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,433subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001737864279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy |
| Created | 26 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 2,433 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 2,438 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 2,444 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 2,451 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 2,454 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 2,455 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 2,460 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,467 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 2,469 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 2,474 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 2,476 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 2,477 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 2,480 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,481 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 2,481 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Here is a 10 min introduction explaining why I investigated the continually growing number of vaccines on the childhood program in 2004. This topic is censored in mainstream debate (as you will note in the video) and the government provides misinformation on this topic. This is why we cannot speak truth to power but commonsense must win the day if we are to save humanity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4drm7c3IZy0
#3tablets https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TflG20rikxE
🇦🇺🔥💉Shocking Australian Stat's on Child deaths/harms from Sharon Cousins. Where are the parents speaking up?? Did they get quietly compensated for the injuroes?? "5,937 child cases of Covid jab harm reported on the TGA DAEN, including 9 child deaths (aged 5 to 17). Recently published TGA FOI 26-3347, shows the various batch numbers/doses and serious case numbers. Currently 142,017 jab cases on TGA DAEN including 5,9…
https://substack.com/@shawnbuckleylaw/note/c-295221724?r=o0ti7&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Finally another hero has arrived to save us from the insanity of mandatory medication, such as vaccination. Mental health is through the roof in Australia, (as are disabilities), because of the stress that is caused through mandatory medication. Particularly when these policies are in healthy people and particularly when the drugs (aka vaccines) are known to be experimental. Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese this i…
https://open.substack.com/pub/thetruthaboutcancerofficial/p/the-mrna-harvest-why-your-vaccine?r=o0ti7&utm_medium=ios
https://youtu.be/kHpl7BdR7LQ
Can we please just stop with the “Autism is genetic” argument. It’s a cop out, and it’s only half the story. 🎥 Watch Dr Judy Wilyman’s full presentation at The Vaccination Conversation: https://rumble.com/v7bigio-mandatory-vaccination-a-crime-against-humanity-dr-judy-wilyman-at-the-vacci.html
https://substack.com/@drjudywilyman/note/c-302239983?r=o0ti7&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
When the science doesn't hold up, they don't bring better evidence (because they don’t have any) — they bring social pressure. If the claims they make about vaccines were actually true, the data would speak for itself and they wouldn't need to tell you what to think — that's not science. That's doctrine enforcement. And what do they do when they have no real evidence to back them up? The classic cult tactics of de…
One of the most common arguments we get from pro-vaxxers is that vaccines eradicated polio... when in reality, it just got rebranded. As "polio" numbers appeared to drop after the vaccine was rolled out, similar diagnoses like Guillain-Barré syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis, and aseptic meningitis quietly rose and were largely ignored. Remember when the flu seemed to disappear off the face of the earth with the ri…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@AustraliansforCHD · 3,1963 postsAustralian Federation Party (FedParty) - Official Channel
@AusRepsOfficial · 1,1402 postsAustralian Frontline Health Professionals
@AusFrontlineHealthProfessionals · 9291 postPHA WA Channel
@PHA_WA · 2221 postJust an artist questioning
@just_an_artist_questioning · 8371 postVICTORIA FREEDOM KEEPERS
@victoriafreedomkeepers · 1,1651 postWA Rising Up Events
@warisingupevents · 691 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@reignitedemocracy · 22,776
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
@ChefPeteEvans · 29,077
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vaccination Decisions” (@vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy), 2,433 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaccinationdecisionsDrJudy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.