توضیحات مدیرعامل صرافی رمزارز ompfinex در رابطه با تاخیرهای پرداخت اخیر.

Channel
معرفی کلاهبرداران
@v2scam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,950subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003798539084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @v2scam |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/v2scam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,950 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 2,962 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 2,977 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 2,979 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.4%
- avg views ÷ 2,950 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 574
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.455%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (26 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,310 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 😐 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
عزیزان دل کسی اینجا داخل پلیس+10 یا دفتر پیشخوان دولت کارمیکنه؟ @amiraly7 لطف کنه مسیج بده بهم
Signed Amiraly
سلام من امتحان نهایی شیمی دارم فردا به این چنل پیام دادم فیلم امتحان نهایی بخرم پول واریزم کردم منو عضو دو تا چنل کرد اومدم بهش میگم فیلمات ناقصه منو ریمو کرد میگم چرا ریمو میکنی میگه خودت بهتر میدونی . یکی به من بگه من پی فردا امتحان نهایی دارم چیو میدونم که این عضو میگه خودت بهتر میدونی😭 https://t.me/Enamad_Tamasha @tamasha_buy
👍2
Signed Amiraly
هوش مصنوعی، کلاهبرداریهای تلفنی را وارد مرحله جدیدی کرد 🔺 گزارش جدیدی نشان میدهد کلاهبرداران با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی، تماسهای تلفنی جعلی را واقعیتر از گذشته طراحی میکنند؛ از تقلید صدا گرفته تا جعل هویت افراد و سازمانها. 🔻 کارشناسان هشدار میدهند اجرای ناقص استانداردهای امنیتی توسط برخی اپراتورها، شناسایی و جلوگیری از این تماسهای کلاهبرداری را دشوارتر کرده است. @v2scam
⭕️ هشدار! 🔹 لیستی با عنوان نام، مشخصات، آدرس و شماره ملی بیش از ۴۰۰۰۰ نیروی بسیج و هکر و سپاهی در کانلهای تلگرام درحال پخش شدن است. یکی از فایل های این لیست حاوی بدافزار است. 🔗 https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/f057b5a994e5b021b867600727d1b8041345fe58449630b7173f5664d1620e01/detection 🔹 بدافزار یک نسخه از action1 را روی سیستم قربانی نصب و آن را به پنل خود اضافه میکند. @v2scam
😐7
مالیات معوقه؛ تله جدید کلاهبرداران معاون اجتماعی و فرهنگی پلیس فتا: 🔹کلاهبرداران با ارسال پیام به اسم سازمان امور مالیاتی کشور در ایتا، روبیکا و بله، کاربران را به صفحات فیشینگ هدایت میکنند تا اطلاعات و کدهای تایید آنها را سرقت کنند. 🔹سازمان امور مالیاتی کشور به هیچ عنوان در پیام رسانهای داخلی، به این نحو هیچ موردی برای شما ارسال نمیکند. @v2scam
❤1
⚠️ هشدار و اطلاعرسانی مهم ⚠️ گزارشهای متعددی از کاربران و مالباختگان در خصوص بروز مشکلات جدی در دریافت مطالبات و عدم امکان برداشت وجه از صرافی اوامپی فاینکس (OMPFinex - شرکت مدیریت صادرات اوژن مشرق پارس) دریافت کردم؛ خواستم به اطلاع برسونم که بر اساس پیامهای دریافتی، روند تسویهحساب با کاربران متوقف شده و طبق گزارشها هیچ تماسی از هیچ طریقی رو پاسخگو نیستند و حتی ظاهراً دفاتر شرکت رو هم تخلیه کردند. با توجه به…
❤2
علی و محمد بهادری نژاد با این شماره کارت ها فعالیت داره برای بازگردانی پیج ازم۱۵۰۰ گرفت بلاک کرد کشاورزی 6037701634291709 پاسارگاد 5022291547321594 6280231564768033 مسکن 6219861861480795سامان 6396071250475639بانک سرمایه https://t.me/shogermambc اینم کانالشه با پیگیری هایی که ادامه داره این شخص ۴ـ۵ تا کانال و سایت و پیج داره که از هر طرف مردمو میچاپه یه گروه بزرگ دعانویسی و طلسم داره از مردم پول میگیره به بهانه س…
❤1
Signed Amiraly
😎 ایران ؛ جزو ۵ کشور اول جهان در شیوع باجافزار! ▪️در ادامه حضور پررنگ ایران در رتبهبندیهای نهچندان افتخارآمیز، این بار نوبت به باجافزارها رسیده. تازهترین آمار کسپرسکی نشون میده ایران از نظر درصد مواجه کاربران با حملات باجافزاری، در بین ۵ کشور اول جهان قرار داره؛ جایی که یمن، افغانستان و ترکمنستان رتبههای بالاتری رو به خود اختصاص دادند. + باجافزارها بعد از آلوده کردن سیستم، فایلهای قربانی رو رمزگذاری میکنن…
🤬4🔥1
🚨 هشدار مهم؛ «عکسهای قدیمیات را پیدا کردم» میتواند حساب بانکیتان را خالی کند! 📱 یک پیام ساده با عنوانهایی مثل: 🔹 «عکسهای قدیمیات رو پیدا کردم» 🔹 «چند تا عکس یادگاری داشتیم» 🔹 «تصویر جالبی از گذشته پیدا کردم» 🔹 «عکس یادگاری با هوش مصنوعی» ممکن است در ظاهر یک پیام دوستانه باشد، اما پشت آن یک ترفند سایبری برای نصب بدافزار و سرقت اطلاعات شما پنهان شده باشد. ⚠️ روش کار کلاهبرداران چگونه است؟ مجرمان سایبری با ا…
❤3
💡 کد تایید پلتفرمهای اقساطی را تحویل دیگران ندهید؛ کلاهبردار با اعتبار شما خرید میکند کلاهبرداران در یک ترفند فیشینگ تازه، با کاربران پلتفرمهای خرید اقساطی مانند «دیجیکالا» و «اسنپپی» تماس میگیرند و به بهانههایی مثل برندهشدن در قرعهکشی، دریافت جایزه یا تکمیل ثبتنام، از آنها میخواهند کد تایید ارسالی به تلفن همراهشان را بخوانند. اما این کد در واقع کلید ورود به حساب کاربر است و با تحویل آن، مجرم میتواند ک…
👍1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @v2scam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 741,871 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@v2scam named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معرفی کلاهبرداران” (@v2scam), 2,950 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v2scam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.