Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
3,880 average views per post against 1,241 subscribers — an engagement rate of 312.7%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (1 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
34,925
Mature posts only
351.0% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,233–1,242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:03
1,241
+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:37
1,237
+3
6 Aug 2026, 11:52
1,234
no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:07
1,234
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
312.7%
avg views ÷ 1,241 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,880
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
9 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
34,925
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
26.1%
👍
5
21.7%
👏
5
21.7%
🙏
4
17.4%
👎
3
13.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💌В адрес директора «Луганскэнерго» филиала АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» Бориса Олеговича Рыжилова поступило сразу два благодарственных письма: одно – коллективное от жителей улицы Калинина города Свердловск, а другое – личное – от 77-летней жительницы этой же улицы Любови Николаевны Самарской. Эти письма особые! Они не напечатаны, а написаны от руки на простом альбомном листе – и в этом есть как раз особая искренность, ощущ…
За период с 27 июля по 3 августа аварийно-восстановительными бригадами АО "Юго-Западная Электросетевая Компания" восстановлено электроснабжение 339 768 абонентов в Донецкой и Луганской Народных Республиках, Запорожской и Херсонской областях, обесточенных в результате обстрелов ВСУ.
Из них:
⚡️108 992 абонента в зоне обслуживания "Донецкэнерго",
⚡️119 390 абонентов в зоне обслуживания "Луганскэнерго",
⚡️86 600 абонент…
Заместитель Министра энергетики Российской Федерации Евгений Грабчак совместно с заместителем Министра строительства и жилищно-коммунального хозяйства РФ Алмазом Хусаиновым провел выездное совещание, посвященное ключевым вопросам социально-экономического развития ДНР и обеспечению устойчивой работы ее инфраструктуры.
В мероприятии приняли участие Председатель Правительства Республики Андрей Чертков, представители ре…
Заместитель Министра энергетики РФ Евгений Грабчак совместно с заместителями главы Минстроя Алмазом Хусаиновым и Валерием Леоновым провёл выездное совещание в Луганской Народной Республике по вопросам социально-экономического развития региона.
В мероприятии приняли участие председатель правительства ЛНР, представители органов власти и энергетических предприятий, в том числе АО "Юго-Западная ЭСК".
В рамках мероприяти…
22 июля на основании решения учредительного собрания создан Совет представителей первичных профсоюзных организаций АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК».
В его состав вошли председатели первичных профсоюзных организаций филиалов АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» — «Луганскэнерго», «Запорожьеэнерго», «Херсонэнерго», а также председатель ППО АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» и его заместитель.
Деятельность нового коллегиального органа будет направлена на к…
22 июля враг снова нанес прицельный удар по энергетикам.
В результате атаки БПЛА ранение получил водитель Сватовского РЭС ПО «Северные электрические сети» филиала АО «Юго-Западная ЭС» «Луганскэнерго». Пострадавший был оперативно доставлен в медицинское учреждение.
Трагедия стала очередным напоминанием о том, какую цену платят энергетики, ежедневно выполняя свои должностные обязанности.
⚡️Желаем скорейшего выздоров…
Сегодня в торжественной обстановке Генеральный директор АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» Вадим Павлов по поручению Главы ДНР Дениса Пушилина вручил награды трем сотрудникам филиала Общества «Донецкэнерго».
«Вам приходится работать в очень непростых условиях. Но благодаря вам у жителей Волновахи, Авдеевки, Горловки и других населенных пунктов есть свет. Спасибо за ваш труд, труд сложный, опасный, но чрезвычайно необходимый», - …
За период с 13 по 19 июля аварийно-восстановительными бригадами АО "Юго-Западная Электросетевая Компания" восстановлено электроснабжение 430 910 абонентов в Донецкой и Луганской Народных Республиках, Запорожской и Херсонской областях, обесточенных в результате обстрелов ВСУ.
Из них:
⚡️64 840 абонентов в зоне обслуживания "Донецкэнерго",
⚡️305 805 абонентов в зоне обслуживания "Луганскэнерго",
⚡️56 955 абонентов в зо…
Директор филиала АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» «Луганскэнерго» Борис Рыжилов и его заместитель — главный инженер Анатолий Форис удостоены высокой государственной награды.
За многолетний добросовестный труд и большой личный вклад в развитие топливно-энергетического комплекса энергетики награждены медалями «Трудовая слава» III степени.
Заслуженные награды по поручению Генерального директора АО «Юго-Западная ЭСК» Вадима Павлов…
👍2❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @uzesk_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 123,136 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АО "Юго-Западная Электросетевая Компания"” (@uzesk_official), 1,241 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzesk_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.