Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bulls OTC | Telegram Gifts 🎁 | Новости и обновления

Channel

Bulls OTC | Telegram Gifts 🎁 | Новости и обновления

@uzbulls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,187subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214273110
TypeChannel
Username@uzbulls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uzbulls

Growth

1,1871,1921,189.57 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,186–1,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:291,187-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:121,190-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,191no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:111,191-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:421,192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

479 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10020.9%
custom 53034960116148069388818.4%
👍6513.6%
custom 53033816280457813945311.1%
custom 53053289017932765125210.9%
custom 5303058199828521509438.98%
custom 5330207220682475963347.10%
custom 5285158154823303839183.76%
custom 5202218878888850186163.34%
custom 543168840300969182071.46%
custom 530348607306048517710.209%
custom 544067006009392240010.209%
💊10.209%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2026, 12:58 UTC≈3,330 viewsread 7 August 2026

🟡 Золото — его откупают не просто так. Мир готовится к экономической катастрофе, грядет что-то страшное. Подтверждён! Все мои аналогии оправдали себя всем удачи!

11 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC≈3,930 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вы тоже думаете как откатить теперь телеграм в старую версию?

  1. Да52%
  2. Нет32%
  3. Вообще не сижу и меня тут тоже нет!16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52851581548233038394custom 53030581998285215093custom 53053289017932765123

5 Feb 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,980 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Теперь надеюсь вы поняли что подразумевался под словом замок, к сожалению мы нырнули с текущих! Что не было исключено! Всем удачи дальше хуже мб 65😁

custom 53302072206824759639custom 53033816280457813946custom 53053289017932765126custom 52022188788888501864custom 53030581998285215092

4 Feb 2026, 09:48 UTC≈3,740 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Орел

custom 533020722068247596320custom 530305819982852150915custom 530349601161480693813

4 Feb 2026, 09:48 UTC≈3,550 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

11custom 53033816280457813948custom 53030581998285215096

31 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC≈3,310 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Теперь думаю этот пост больше не Bullshit, как тогда это вам казалось таким! К сожалению людей засадили тогда по 4$ за тон что маловероятно перебьют эту отметку в ближайщее время!✅ Крипта = боль примите это!

custom 530338162804578139415custom 530349601161480693813👍12custom 52851581548233038393

29 Jan 2026, 16:19 UTC≈3,160 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

​📉 Мысли по рынку: Биткоин и последний забег ​Немного хочу поделиться с вами видением ситуации. ​⏳ До конца февраля мы еще можем увидеть движение в лонг, но, скорее всего, это последний забег. После февраля медведи перехватят инициативу. Как только цена уйдет ниже 80к — считайте, что замок закрылся. Рынок больше не даст вам выйти по хорошим ценам. ​💀 Альткоины — им будет больнее всего. 🟡 Золото — его откупают не

custom 530532890179327651216custom 530349601161480693813👍12

27 Jan 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,500 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пример неудачного крафта😁

custom 5305328901793276512169👍8

26 Jan 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,360 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Узбекистане заблокировали Getgems.io Целевая аудитория подарков это СНГ минус 1 страна прогрессируем!!!

custom 5303496011614806938107👍5custom 53030581998285215091

25 Jan 2026, 23:52 UTC≈2,000 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Никогда не везло в этом, хотяя агрейдил больше 100подарков ни одного черного фона

custom 528515815482330383911custom 530338162804578139496custom 53053289017932765121

25 Jan 2026, 21:51 UTC≈1,740 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вы в курсе что медаль # 1 апнули лишь спустя 2мин после выхода апгрейда😂

custom 530305819982852150997👍4custom 53034960116148069382

25 Jan 2026, 01:15 UTC≈1,860 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В @premiumbot пропишите команду /magic Может перепасть премиум на несколько мес✅

custom 5305328901793276512106👍4custom 53034960116148069381

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uzbulls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTCAnonymous Poll88 voters

Вы тоже думаете как откатить теперь телеграм в старую версию?

  1. Да52%
  2. Нет32%
  3. Вообще не сижу и меня тут тоже нет!16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 28 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 596,844 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bulls OTC | Telegram Gifts 🎁 | Новости и обновления” (@uzbulls), 1,187 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzbulls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.